Sunday, 23 November 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA - As Texas Indicted Idiot lameduck Governor Rick "Payback" Perry continued to call upon someone anyone and everyone to sue United States President Barack Obama for something anything and everything the Ninth Amendment meanwhile seemingly was prevented by interfering parties or circumstances as described in the Ninth Amendment's recent reply to a reader's inquiry as to upcoming articles on the subject of problems experienced with Google-reported Blogger statistics to a publisher such as the Ninth Amendment's site owner. The Ninth Amendment is committed fully to take whatever measures are necessary to assist in the investigation and corrective action required to insure the best possible presentation possible of the Ninth Amendment site to our readers.
There have been increasingly erratic divergences from what over several years had been this Site's experience with Google's contractually provided ¨accurate up to the minute statistics¨ which figures in the past months repeatedly have proven exponentially less reliable contradictory in their reporting of statistics such as numbers of pageviews depending upon what time period one is examining and then even much more greater discrepancies with Google Analytics.
Just one more in a long list of new irregularities for now being traffic seemingly reaching the site if at all through constantly changing foreign referring URLS and sites rarely seen before. Today for example for some time the highest referring URL/site address was http://goody498.blog27.fc2.com/ with the referral numbers later dropping. In any case however the fact is that it appears to be Japanese blog or journal of some sort with which the Ninth Amendment has no known connection whatsoever. (This is not meant as encouragement to readers to go to that address in any way as the Ninth Amendment has no assurance regarding the integrity of the site nor any information as to why it would been refer readers to the Ninth Amendment.)
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
The Ninth Amendment to the Constitution is the strongest statement therein that powers not expressly granted the State are retained as rights of the People. The State has misconstrued, misrepresented, ignored, and denied the People's rights by elimination of protections reserved alone to them, not recognized by the Supreme Court, the Legislative, and worst the Executive Branch in the illegitimate exercise of draconian powers which unlawfully disparage the inalienable rights of the People.
Showing posts with label blogger+. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blogger+. Show all posts
23 November 2014
16 October 2014
VIII. Google Retaliates For Google+ Deceptive Practice Disclosure? DETERIORATING: Google Persists In Apparent Intentional Failure To Perform On Contractual Promise Of Accurate Up To The Minute Site Statistics Amid New Confirmation Google May Have Reason To Retaliate Against The Ninth Amendment Since Expanding Exposure Of Apparent Deceptive Google+ Practices First Disclosed In Monday, 13 October Post As Confirmed In Below Link
Thursday, 16 October 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA - Google after weeks of declining performance in providing promised site performance statistical information and then twice in the past week having apparently held back virtually all accurate information and then "dumped" pageview statistics for 100-200 pageviews in one minute has further deteriorated in site performance statistics reporting specifically since on 13 October 2014 this site published a true and accurate account of Google's Blogger dismal reporting performance with this publisher's site since which time this site has published 7 new posts inclusive nearly all of which Google has reported as having virtually no pageviews but instead merely a few from posts from years before from some of the more obscure countries reading this site but now shown as the leaders of rapidly declining readership numbers all of which has never before happened and is virtually impossible statistically such as to suggest Google either is responsible for interfering with site access and/or complicit in such activity and/or in any case apparently willfully neither ceasing any such behavior nor if it is not primarily responsible failing to respond to or correct the situation per nearly 20 requests by publisher via Google provided means of communication which have gone unanswered.
Meanwhile Google appears to continue to retaliate against the Ninth Amendment by interfering with recent posts reader access and/or accurate statistical reporting for the Ninth Amendment's exposure of just one alleged component of Google's deceptive practices in trying to coerce Google Blogger and other service users to switch to Google+ solely for Google's financial benefit in attempting to create a contrived lucrative mainly social media franchise attempt by confusing current users to permit disclosure of personal information for the new endeavor and artificially create friendships and relationships between persons are non-existent one example of which is discussed for interested readers in the link immediately below:
http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/column/jay-gabler/google-plus-deceptive-friend-invite
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Meanwhile Google appears to continue to retaliate against the Ninth Amendment by interfering with recent posts reader access and/or accurate statistical reporting for the Ninth Amendment's exposure of just one alleged component of Google's deceptive practices in trying to coerce Google Blogger and other service users to switch to Google+ solely for Google's financial benefit in attempting to create a contrived lucrative mainly social media franchise attempt by confusing current users to permit disclosure of personal information for the new endeavor and artificially create friendships and relationships between persons are non-existent one example of which is discussed for interested readers in the link immediately below:
http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/column/jay-gabler/google-plus-deceptive-friend-invite
14 October 2014
III. Google Retaliates For Google+ Deceptive Practices Disclosure? DEVELOPING: Google Worst Blogger Support Ever Continues Unabated And/Or Exacerbated Daily Possibly Related To The Controversial Google+ Scheme With Apparent Grossly Inaccurate Site Performance Statistics And Absence Of Google Response
Tuesday, 14 October 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA. - Google Inc. in fierce competition for the huge blogger market bringing in massive (by the standards of most) advertising revenues and used by Google as one conduit to direct literally millions of potential candidates for social media into Google's struggling come-from-behind contrived Google+ franchise which Google consistently has tried to coerce bloggers and others into joining so as to give it the expected huge (to most) financial benefits of a ready made yet further "social media" player attempting to acquire personal information metadata known to be shared willingly or not with the CIA of users of Google's other products wholesale into its social media entree through borderline deceptive practices including implicit threats that those not using the Google+ service will be deprived of information as how best to make use of other Google services or lose new benefits accruing to users of other Google services that they should already be enjoying but only if they "sign up" for Google+ as it struggles to muscle its way into the "social media" community whether intentionally or inadvertently given the large number of Google created disguised "opportunities" to mistakenly do so then going so far as to appoint others into users "circles of friends" chosen in many cases by Google itself therefore has of late failed miserably in living up to its promises and contractual obligations to the millions of other core Google product users including of bloggers having joined Google's "Blogger" program in detrimental reliance on its temptation of supposed significant ad revenues yet in fact experiencing essentially non-existent support including long-broken "gadgets" and failures to provide personal responses to users buttressed of late by a failure to even provide what appear to be site performance statistics of any accuracy or timeliness such that they are not only helpful to site development but actually detrimental to site publishers. Google has neither responded to requests for comment nor requests for correction of these and other worsening problems with access to most recent posts such as this or unsubstantiated allegations regarding Google+ deceptive practices.
Performance statistics intermittently provided by Google to publisher report for the first time in years numbers of pageviews and related information that are at such great downward variation from historical site performance as to raise serious concerns regarding some as yet unidentified party or parties' concerted manipulation of or interference with information of true pageviews and/or alternatively some interference or other disruption of unknown origin with readers' ability to access these posts including this post as well as two others published immediately before this post the first of which also was included an examination of Google's performance (or lack thereof) which report virtually no pageviews nor hits that now has persisted for several days and raises serious questions about the integrity of the service or its ability to isolate and correct problems. Readers and pubilshers are encouraged to document and report publicly as well as to appropriate internal and external authorities any similar experiences and communicate publicly with others having similar or other difficulties that appear to be going either ignored, unnaddressed or even result in a further deterioration of service.
Such victims should document any incident or information and especially be sure to alert authorities to any evidence that such reports are resulting in what appears to be any retaliation or apparently intentional (or not) further conduct which suggests that any person or entity suffering such damage actually is being targeted and/or merely subjected to any further apparently illegal or inappropriate conduct infringing upon any legal rights and/or causing any further damage of any sort from distress to economic and everything between resulting from further declines in "service".
Readers and publishers should not be concerned as redress will be forthcoming where deserved whether in public or private action(s) but all must be aware that what was considered "service" may even become distorted into efforts to discourage, disrupt and/or destroy any party's maintenance of any site or mechanism such as to result in the stifling or cessation of one's exercise of Constitutional rights of free speech and the press and/or any other unlawful or inappropriate interference with any person or entity's free expression, conduct and right to engage unmolested in a legitimate business endeavor without limitation. The appropriate attitude for most to maintain is that all of the above is a gift which to be fully exploited as necessary must be calmly and carefully persistently documented where possible and also witnessed in first person by others when possible.
As for the Ninth Amendment these fully documented and witnesses problems reported continue or effectively have become worse with the passage of time which now has extended to midday Wednesday, 15 October 2014. Meanwhile Google continues to retaliate against the Ninth Amendment by interfering with recent posts reader access and/or accurate statistical reporting for the Ninth Amendment's exposure of just one component of Google's deceptive practices in trying to coerce Google Blogger and other service users to switch to Google+ solely for Google's financial benefit in attempting to create a contrived very lucrative social media franchise by deceiving current users to disclose personal information and artificially create friendships and relationships between persons which are none existent one example of which is discussed for interested readers in the link immediately below:
http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/column/jay-gabler/google-plus-deceptive-friend-invite
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Performance statistics intermittently provided by Google to publisher report for the first time in years numbers of pageviews and related information that are at such great downward variation from historical site performance as to raise serious concerns regarding some as yet unidentified party or parties' concerted manipulation of or interference with information of true pageviews and/or alternatively some interference or other disruption of unknown origin with readers' ability to access these posts including this post as well as two others published immediately before this post the first of which also was included an examination of Google's performance (or lack thereof) which report virtually no pageviews nor hits that now has persisted for several days and raises serious questions about the integrity of the service or its ability to isolate and correct problems. Readers and pubilshers are encouraged to document and report publicly as well as to appropriate internal and external authorities any similar experiences and communicate publicly with others having similar or other difficulties that appear to be going either ignored, unnaddressed or even result in a further deterioration of service.
Such victims should document any incident or information and especially be sure to alert authorities to any evidence that such reports are resulting in what appears to be any retaliation or apparently intentional (or not) further conduct which suggests that any person or entity suffering such damage actually is being targeted and/or merely subjected to any further apparently illegal or inappropriate conduct infringing upon any legal rights and/or causing any further damage of any sort from distress to economic and everything between resulting from further declines in "service".
Readers and publishers should not be concerned as redress will be forthcoming where deserved whether in public or private action(s) but all must be aware that what was considered "service" may even become distorted into efforts to discourage, disrupt and/or destroy any party's maintenance of any site or mechanism such as to result in the stifling or cessation of one's exercise of Constitutional rights of free speech and the press and/or any other unlawful or inappropriate interference with any person or entity's free expression, conduct and right to engage unmolested in a legitimate business endeavor without limitation. The appropriate attitude for most to maintain is that all of the above is a gift which to be fully exploited as necessary must be calmly and carefully persistently documented where possible and also witnessed in first person by others when possible.
As for the Ninth Amendment these fully documented and witnesses problems reported continue or effectively have become worse with the passage of time which now has extended to midday Wednesday, 15 October 2014. Meanwhile Google continues to retaliate against the Ninth Amendment by interfering with recent posts reader access and/or accurate statistical reporting for the Ninth Amendment's exposure of just one component of Google's deceptive practices in trying to coerce Google Blogger and other service users to switch to Google+ solely for Google's financial benefit in attempting to create a contrived very lucrative social media franchise by deceiving current users to disclose personal information and artificially create friendships and relationships between persons which are none existent one example of which is discussed for interested readers in the link immediately below:
http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/column/jay-gabler/google-plus-deceptive-friend-invite
01 August 2014
Google Blogger Sites Suffer Grossly Worsening "Up To The Minute" Statistical Reporting Performance In Recent Months Making Such Representations Used To Lure New Google "Bloggers" Untrue
Friday, 1 August 2014, MOUNTAIN "OF CASH" VIEW - One need say no more than repeat the false promise used by Google to lure what are now reportedly in the millions of "bloggers" stolen away from many other competitors which have grown up and thrived offering free blogs probably now in the hundreds of thousands by most every Google-style competitor with easily superior service to the notoriously unresponsive Google computer cash giant featuring basically non-existent "customer service" unless one happens to be calling from the CIA front office. Instead Google cleverly lets its customer hash it out among themselves as they increasingly release programs with bugs and bring all manner of "products" to market with clearly acknowledged "known issues" that hopefully Google's millions of customers will sort out for them so they will not have to lift a finger or spend a dime fixing them. Imagine how happy you would be if you were to purchase your new Cadillac with a hidden laundry list of "known issues" bound to pop up at any time and then given other customers' phone numbers to "try to work them out" even after free placement in your new "circle of goddamn friends I do not want". How jolly!
The fraudulent phrase that this Ninth Amendment log has come particularly to take issue with is that after establishing our site for well over seven years on the Google "Blogger" program lured from the widely recognized quality of the likes of for example competitor Wordpress' and now so many other free blogging services the Google false clarion call remains that Google the Great is particularly desirable to bloggers for "Google's up-to-the-minute stats!" Clearly Google recognizes stats importance in recruiting most profitable bloggers and those bloggers maintaining their sites to the best standards better, and for counting all that cash.
But sad to say after perhaps one hundred plus "feedback explanations" with "screenshots" sent dutifully from this publisher to Google we have in several months growing on years now heard NOTHING AT ALL back from Google other than steadily declining service and less and less reliable statistics to the point they are laughable. 270 pageviews one day -- then maybe a half dozen in the following ten hours. We KNOW we have the pageviews, but when they do not show up with Google statistics we also KNOW we do not have a cent of our earned money from Google's advertising program or all the supposed value of that expertise.
GOOGLE - We are too busy working for the NSA and CIA now. We will NEVER get to you, even if you buy our product which we will be happy to sell you rife with "known issues". What, did we miss something, did Google somehow get a pass from reality but a very large bucket of gold at the end of the rainbow? If only we went to M.I.T. we too might have been clever enough to come up with a name of the times just perfect based on our sheltered level of maturity: "GOO-GOO". Oh scrap that we have a perfect fit for the best new corporate name: "Known Issues".
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
The fraudulent phrase that this Ninth Amendment log has come particularly to take issue with is that after establishing our site for well over seven years on the Google "Blogger" program lured from the widely recognized quality of the likes of for example competitor Wordpress' and now so many other free blogging services the Google false clarion call remains that Google the Great is particularly desirable to bloggers for "Google's up-to-the-minute stats!" Clearly Google recognizes stats importance in recruiting most profitable bloggers and those bloggers maintaining their sites to the best standards better, and for counting all that cash.
But sad to say after perhaps one hundred plus "feedback explanations" with "screenshots" sent dutifully from this publisher to Google we have in several months growing on years now heard NOTHING AT ALL back from Google other than steadily declining service and less and less reliable statistics to the point they are laughable. 270 pageviews one day -- then maybe a half dozen in the following ten hours. We KNOW we have the pageviews, but when they do not show up with Google statistics we also KNOW we do not have a cent of our earned money from Google's advertising program or all the supposed value of that expertise.
GOOGLE - We are too busy working for the NSA and CIA now. We will NEVER get to you, even if you buy our product which we will be happy to sell you rife with "known issues". What, did we miss something, did Google somehow get a pass from reality but a very large bucket of gold at the end of the rainbow? If only we went to M.I.T. we too might have been clever enough to come up with a name of the times just perfect based on our sheltered level of maturity: "GOO-GOO". Oh scrap that we have a perfect fit for the best new corporate name: "Known Issues".
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
29 July 2014
Is Increased Criminal Interference With This Site Related Most Recently Possibly To URL Site https://webalert.io/en Re-Direct www.web.mention.com To The Stifling Of Free Speech And Press By Corrupt Texas Republican Politicians And Their Paymasters?
Tuesday, 29 July 2014, SAN ANTONIO, TX -The Tanguska, Siberia Ninth Amendment Situation Headquarters apologizes to any readers inconvenienced by continuing increased criminal interference with pageviews of this site escalating from the prevention of cyber communications between the Ninth Amendment site owner and publisher and Google Blogger's Mountain View, California support enclave apparently emanating or connected to the immediate geographical area of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Office located at the Interstate 10 Frontage Road in San Antonio, TX. As with Google and all law enforcement authorities domestic and foreign as appropriate any investigation and assistance with the apprehension and conviction of these perpetrators of previously identified criminal acts against the Ninth Amendment and its staff detailed in earlier posts here is most appreciated and will receive the full cooperation and assistance of the owner and publisher of the Ninth Amendment Log at www.waronnothing.blogspot.com.
On a possibly related note the Blogger Dashboard and other information sources legally available to the Ninth Amendment have identified a new referring URL that may be perfectly innocent of any wrongdoing but has for the first time shown up in the Ninth Amendment's internal information sources supplied by Google and has also been identified to Google as coincident with severe interference in past days with the Ninth Amendment site. The URL in question identifies the site as https://webaleret.lo/en which automatically re-directs to www.web.mention.com and apparently claims the ability to allow individuals with usernames on sites such as Facebook, Google, Twitter, and other named to create their own passwords upon joining the web.mention.com site. Although the Ninth Amendment emphasizes it has no knowledge as to the propriety or impropriety of such commercial offerings, the Ninth Amendment is confident that Google and the nearby FBI office to this local Ninth Amendment IP location may have a great deal more information available to it regarding the legality of the use of this URL for purposes which may or may not be related to interference with cyber communications involving other sites or matters unknown at this time.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
On a possibly related note the Blogger Dashboard and other information sources legally available to the Ninth Amendment have identified a new referring URL that may be perfectly innocent of any wrongdoing but has for the first time shown up in the Ninth Amendment's internal information sources supplied by Google and has also been identified to Google as coincident with severe interference in past days with the Ninth Amendment site. The URL in question identifies the site as https://webaleret.lo/en which automatically re-directs to www.web.mention.com and apparently claims the ability to allow individuals with usernames on sites such as Facebook, Google, Twitter, and other named to create their own passwords upon joining the web.mention.com site. Although the Ninth Amendment emphasizes it has no knowledge as to the propriety or impropriety of such commercial offerings, the Ninth Amendment is confident that Google and the nearby FBI office to this local Ninth Amendment IP location may have a great deal more information available to it regarding the legality of the use of this URL for purposes which may or may not be related to interference with cyber communications involving other sites or matters unknown at this time.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
21 July 2014
CIA Partner Google Blogger Statistic Failures Past Year Habitually Grossly Under-Report Ninth Amendment Site Performance Data With Google Now Reporting Misinformation Six Plus Hours Daily
Monday, 21 July 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA - The Ninth Amendment log now has published three hundred and forty finalized posts continuously for seven years with this same site URL addresss from the same Mountain View, California located IP address including the "blogspot" domain root registered for Google "Blogger" sites. Google for several years has encouraged "blog publishers" despite assurances that publishers' sites "blogspot"-based URLs will be maintained by and never interrupted by Google that publishers also consider registering the independent unique component of their site names themselves without using the blogspot domain with which the sites were established by the publishers from the start of their "Blogger"-based relationship with Google.
Google facilitates re-directing independent sites so that they still apparently without undue complication can continue uninterrupted along with Google the benefits of the blogspot relationship including blogspot site support including timely accurate statistical reporting and continued conforming participation as accepted into the Google "Adsense" campaign and other more recent affiliated advertising programs. Google however which earlier further facilitated this process by itself directly selling domain names listing itself with about ten other major domain name vendors has since withdrawn itself from the list encouraging publishers to use one of the other recommended reliable domain name vendors such as godaddy.com for issuance of the publishers' unique domain name currently used in combination with "blogspot".
Readers with but a brief Google engine search of the word "blogger" can see for themselves that "blogger" has become a very heavily promoted full-service blogging tool by Google reflected in part by a great many subjective search results yielded by the Google engine search which readers will readily see describe "blogger" glowingly in positive terms emphasizing supposedly compelling opportunities particularly financially implying even possible financial independence for which sample true video first-person anecdotes are offered particularly for blogs associated with existing or contemporaneously established businesses as well as from the avowed benefits of the "blogger" seamless integration with a broad and greatly expanding range of web and web-enhanced businesses with the advantage of available Google free and paid advice and assistance including through such tools as "Adwords" for smaller and developing businesses with "Google Analytics" available also for businesses tending to be larger.
Google although it allegedly shares advertising revenue when certain thresholds are reached with blog publishers through its Adsense and other programs has never made available to our knowledge or information to its publishers now reportedly numbering worldwide in the millions any share of the significant value to Google of Blogger goodwill, the value of demographic and other experiential information collected through the Blogger program, the value of the very heavily promoted Blogger+ program supposedly related primarily to blogging but actually most significantly valued by Google apparently as its grand entree into the by far most lucrative social media area all of which value is in no way to be shared with the publishers in the Blogger+ program although it is estimated to be far more valuable to Google through the vast collection of demographic information including of individuals and groups more or less manufactured by Google and encouraging such things as so-called "circles of friends" never even before know by participants altogether purporting to offer vastly more constantly Google-emphasized benefits including vague claims to offer far more unclear unexplained financial benefits than the original Blogger program apparently relying heavily on implied promises of, inter alia, readers' endorsements somehow without explanation including greatly increased advertising revenues.
It soon became apparent that Google was not beyond more or less tricking non-Blogger+ participants into joining the program through the click of a button because of apparently intentionally confusing references to things such as profiles and other tangential elements of the Blogger program which really offered little greater financial advantage to participants but undisclosed apparently significant benefits to Google which seemingly given the repeated focus on Blogger+ were most valuable to Google which clearly was making no effort to share at any point any of the substantial real value of its surreptitious made-to-order social media behemoth benefiting from basically trafficking in the personal and private information of its long-time Blogger participants. This served to highlight that the long-term undercurrent of the Google Blogger partnership with publishers was not partnership at all since it clearly had been developed on the premise that almost all the benefits would run to Google and would only continue to do so in either greater amounts. This is why hard-working publishers focused on creating truly high quality material were rewarded like the Ninth Amendment with basically nothing (but advice from other participants in the Google program which cost Google absolutely nothing as Google itself grew notorious for never even responding but once in a blue moon to any queries of its millions of publishers thus costing Google next to nothing) while Google amassed a fortune in a matter of a couple decades to rival the great industrial giants of American business enterprise such as General Motors. If Google could have one word to describe the value on the Blogger+ relationships it supposedly celebrated Google's intentions as a "friend" in a circle of friends could only be described as despicable.
Publishers are encouraged to communicate via solely via Google groups with minimum interference with Google personnel presumably counting their fortunes to determine at how young an age they might retire including as to publishers basically just giving to Google what could turn out to be most valuable strategies for the most dubious honor of participating in or taking part in or more accurately being taken by the Blogger+ social media program which has been promoted by Google not without a significant degree of challenge it is conjectured due to Google's less than fully honest approach to the purposes of and the totally confusing and basically largely nonsensical spectrum of different tactics Google uses to try to bring uninterested blogger participants into the Blogger+ program in order to access their personal information without their necessarily informed consent accompanied by warnings or rather more accurately vague threats of apparently potentially serious but actually just somewhat confusing consequences for those who no longer wished to participate any longer after joining in the Blogger+ program.
Such conduct by Google therefore would some might conjecture make any purported agreements including those purporting to incorporate the non-sharing or failure of distribution of potentially huge profits from the collection of vast amounts of personal information to participants unenforceable for several reasons which by simple lay persons might reasonably be seen as fundamentally fraudulent conspiracies among other things also believe possibly may include affirmative defenses of unclean hands and laches for emphasizing what are really minimal benefits to participants while downplaying or altogether neglecting to mention or even provide any information as to the tremendous profits potentially to be gained from the great multitude of Blogger+ relationships established by Google for the unstated purpose of using existing relationships to become competitive in the hugely profitable area of "social media" players such as Facebook, Yahoo, LinkedIn and so many others.
This would be consistent with the larger evolution of Google from what was originally introduced to the world as an academically driven internet entrant to yet another internet behemoth arguably driven first and foremost by profit or perhaps more accurately greed fueled in many cases by the unsuspecting participants in its ever-expanding endeavors using the human capital of basically unknowing and unconsenting participants giving up private and personal information through Google's basically disguised endeavors much like those of, for example, of what have become some of the world's other richest corporations which but for their relationships with for example the CIA and other "national security" agencies who benefit greatly from their information collection may well be poster children for antitrust and privacy invasion actions such as has been demonstrated by hugely costly rulings against the likes of Facebook and Google by European regulators or in the case of Google the European Union's highest court of last resort.
This court's far-reaching reputation links privacy ruling Google's attorneys curiously failed to comment on because they had "not yet reviewed the decision" which seems a somewhat disingenuous response given that the ruling of a "court of last resort" is subject neither to rehearing nor to any appeal whatsoever since there is no higher court. It is in other words "Final" thus the moniker "Court of Last Resort". Hopefully Google did not have to pay too much for outside counsel that was capable of responding with a straight face to such decisions that it could not comment on their impact on Google since counsel had not yet had the opportunity to review them. Those legal fees after all could have gone to hard-working "bloggers" or unknowing new members of "Blogger+" to compensate them for their personal information they did not know was being collected and no doubt added to Google's bottom line.
Persons familiar with the origins of Google in its formative pre-beta stages we vaguely recall to be reported to be the revolutionary brainchild of an MIT professor and developed there by him with some of his MIT students its unique brilliance that it ranked results on the basis of supposedly objective URL-to-URL links promising to give users an unparalleled purity of results not sullied by the rank corruption of secret payoffs, other not so obviously manipulated but reflecting equally crass commercial objectives nor the product of more refined manipulation (now blossomed into an apparently fully legitimate industry of "search engine optimization" accompanied by checklists of sequential steps one takes manually or with computer assistance entering URLs into various directories and totally distorting through "backlinks" for trade and sale the long-discarded original elegant Google concept) by computer hacks skewing search results through more obscured techniques nevertheless delivering equally tainted results in an search result environment where pagerank has long become synonymous with dollars.
Conceptualization of these practices as the modern variation of starting one's business name with a long series of the letter "A" for purposes solely of telephone business page top position placement helps remove some of the "computer IT" mystery to help understand such practices as are being employed to "coax" desired commercial results from search engines. Interested readers are referred to other sources as close as the Wikepedia box to the lower right due to the Ninth Amendment's admitted lack of detailed knowledge and unavailability of its limited resources to more fully research the nascent Google and its subsequent history as being the tale of one more most desirable top academic institution's darling of The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal that was priceless to what might ever be bought from a PR firm or advertising agency or it had to be Reputation.com crafting what one would have the world believe one is rather than what one actually has become.
Presumably even Reputation.com after it deletes all one's bad news must have at least some small tatters of arguably good or at least neutral news left to which some modest shreds can be attached as to one's remaining personality and character, although alternatively there may be other "Reputation Plans" available for more difficult cases such as (1) creating large numbers of potential positive entries that might be reasonably successful in systematically establishing a somewhat better reputation such as for example in the case of Texas Governor Rick Perry upping his charitable church contributions a couple years back when he "earned" a reported $1 million as Governor from $80 to $90, to (2) taking bad entries that otherwise are not susceptible to being scrubbed and having them attributed to as an as unyet unacknowledged minor child whose parents might be amenable to a modest payment for having their name legally changed to your own but followed by a "Junior", "II" , or "III" (the second perhaps being preferable as more broadly susceptible to confusion and the third perchance even more desirable as even more susceptible to confusion) followed by having some keepers of records and so on contacted and not trying to shirk "reputation responsibility" but "come clean" and have one's name corrected to the "Junior", "II", or "III" as the case may be, and finally (3) having one's name legally changed to someone other party's name (but not "identity" as that might probably be illegal though maybe not if they are deceased and done using their identity), or having one's name changed to a new one that they have made up altogether.
We have seriously digressed here which will very soon be remedied as the reason reputations come to mind so readily with Google is that everything Google now does for all appearances is completely antithetical to all the principles for which it was claimed that Google would stand in stark contrast to the increasingly commercial and privacy invasive computer and spy world Google was in fact entering. Google's true colors however soon came out as at the top and side of its results soon appeared those highlighting results that were "sponsored" by payments to Google rather than "linked" by their usefulness to people. Contrary to the high principles which it claimed to embrace with its use of links for results positioning to the contrary Google became associated with all sorts of efforts to achieve high rank by parties willing to spend money to do do and rumors of algorithms and different techniques for achieving high ranks on Google searches became all the commercial rage with former Google employees widely known to hire themselves out for just that purpose. All sorts of enterprises were born devoted to one's achieving the highest Google position possible with no regard whatsoever for the actual quality or value of a site to users, nor in many cases even it use of the English language or the quality of its writing.
As Google expanded from its search engine beginnings it became the antithesis of all for which it once claimed to stand. Its goal rapidly developed into misusing the information available to it through its search engine to collect ALL information on its users searches, keeping a permanent record of them, and it shortly had joined in the competition to become yet another internet behemoth increasing its value by using new methods of compiling ever more information on its users with legal notices that came out in such excruciating detail and with such rapidity that like Facebook it was collecting information at and beyond the very limits of what was permissible at the same time starting to emulate the megalomania of the ever stranger head of Facebook rumored CIA tool Zuckerboy who developed fascinations in no time worthy of J. Edgar Hoover.
Zuckerboy compiled information on his "social media" site using facial recognition technology and any new twisted idea which came to mind to gather more information of what once purported to be nothing more than a friendly facilitator of social interaction but in fact became a cataloger of persons from around the globe with an unhealthy interest in connecting their recognition physically to their name to their contacts to their hobbies to "what was on their mind". Facebook made so much money that billion dollar fines from European regulators outraged at Zuckerboy's invasions of their privacy were hardly even noticed by him, an were probably reimbursed anyway by American taxpayers through the CIA's or some similar outfit's black ops budget. Perhaps Facebook even had its own.
Google having long before abandoned all its higher principles kept its innocent-seeming goofiness in its name alone. Not to be outdone by Facebook Google soon found that it sound had a secret investor in the CIA through a front company in the NYSE. Later all pretense was merely set aside and the CIA just openly invested with Google in a joint venture. Google and CIA built data storage facilities adjacent to one another, it being clear that Google's rapacious gathering of information through the required entering by its users of one I.D. for all its acquisitions, its collection of all information legally possible on it users, and in fact everything it did now being directed to collecting ever more information on individuals and metadata on everything was the C.I.A., F.B.I., N.S.A. and all the others of the rapidly growing number of "National Security" outfits now numbering probably between fifteen and twenty dream come true.
What the State outfits could not legally access or collect they could barely believe their luck in having Americans grown up to believe in a government that followed the law and the U.S. Constitution now willing to go forward with whatever they could get anyone to sign off on their using. And the use of private counterparts such as Facebook using facial recognition technology and Google actually mapping and invading the premises by camera of nearly every house on the earth through open windows and from above was like their dream come true.
What possible legitimate reason could private outfits like Google and Facebook have for this massive invasion of privacy without subjects consent and/or explained in such a way as to be as incomprehensible as adhesion insurance contracts thrown out by the courts years ago. Enough of today's digression and we shall wrap back around to Blogger. Blogger perhaps once of somewhat innocent intentions certainly no longer is that. Every other new appearance on a Blogger or Google screen is yet another attempt to trick a person without their informed consent of signing on for Blogger+ as Google is just so eager to have another route of invasion to person's private lives. It has very little to nothing to producing a blog of quality. It has everything to do with endless promises of meaningless advantages to signing on, sharing more information with Google, identifying circles of friends, or rather creating them as Google takes it upon itself to do far more than keep meaningless records of all its users do, it clearly would like to control what they do, to tell them who their friends are, to use any deceptive device at its disposal to get more persons to sign on to enable them to do basically do nothing except make it that much easier for Google to get every last bit of information about the lives of those who use Google. Google thirsts for "social media" privacy invasion that can rival Facebook's.
Soon Google will have to be left behind for those who are not tools of the CIA and all their law-breaking friends. In the meantime Google at least with this site's blogger statistics is blazing the path for misinformation, disinformation, and in seven years has never responded to a single feedback message sent from this site. And how much has this site collected having been long ago accepted to Adsense, Amazon and other affiliate program"900s? This site's publisher has in seven years not yet received its first advertising paymemt. So in any case Google one might think Google could supply those site performance statistics in something close to real time. Half a day late and confusing Albania for Argentina just does not cut it when you are playing with the Big Boys.
Keep that up and in no time the CIA will have you preparing the final reports for the President on the presence of WMDs. Or maybe the next nuclear missile silo exercise gone awry in Nebraska. You have to prove yourself worthy Google even if you do have a satellite map of the whole earth, a picture taken from 360 degrees outside every person's house in the world, a record of everyone's last five thousand Google searches, copies of all their private pictures and family photo albums, and a list of the everything they have watched and listened to on YouTube since Google bought it, next thing you know the CIA will ask you to keep a record for them of every number called and kept on everyone's Android phone because the Supreme Court told the CIA and the NSA you know even this Court must draw the line somewhere therefore that is not allowed, especially so long as Mr. Justice Thomas is on the bench with his suspected propensity for "900" numbers.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Google facilitates re-directing independent sites so that they still apparently without undue complication can continue uninterrupted along with Google the benefits of the blogspot relationship including blogspot site support including timely accurate statistical reporting and continued conforming participation as accepted into the Google "Adsense" campaign and other more recent affiliated advertising programs. Google however which earlier further facilitated this process by itself directly selling domain names listing itself with about ten other major domain name vendors has since withdrawn itself from the list encouraging publishers to use one of the other recommended reliable domain name vendors such as godaddy.com for issuance of the publishers' unique domain name currently used in combination with "blogspot".
Readers with but a brief Google engine search of the word "blogger" can see for themselves that "blogger" has become a very heavily promoted full-service blogging tool by Google reflected in part by a great many subjective search results yielded by the Google engine search which readers will readily see describe "blogger" glowingly in positive terms emphasizing supposedly compelling opportunities particularly financially implying even possible financial independence for which sample true video first-person anecdotes are offered particularly for blogs associated with existing or contemporaneously established businesses as well as from the avowed benefits of the "blogger" seamless integration with a broad and greatly expanding range of web and web-enhanced businesses with the advantage of available Google free and paid advice and assistance including through such tools as "Adwords" for smaller and developing businesses with "Google Analytics" available also for businesses tending to be larger.
Google although it allegedly shares advertising revenue when certain thresholds are reached with blog publishers through its Adsense and other programs has never made available to our knowledge or information to its publishers now reportedly numbering worldwide in the millions any share of the significant value to Google of Blogger goodwill, the value of demographic and other experiential information collected through the Blogger program, the value of the very heavily promoted Blogger+ program supposedly related primarily to blogging but actually most significantly valued by Google apparently as its grand entree into the by far most lucrative social media area all of which value is in no way to be shared with the publishers in the Blogger+ program although it is estimated to be far more valuable to Google through the vast collection of demographic information including of individuals and groups more or less manufactured by Google and encouraging such things as so-called "circles of friends" never even before know by participants altogether purporting to offer vastly more constantly Google-emphasized benefits including vague claims to offer far more unclear unexplained financial benefits than the original Blogger program apparently relying heavily on implied promises of, inter alia, readers' endorsements somehow without explanation including greatly increased advertising revenues.
It soon became apparent that Google was not beyond more or less tricking non-Blogger+ participants into joining the program through the click of a button because of apparently intentionally confusing references to things such as profiles and other tangential elements of the Blogger program which really offered little greater financial advantage to participants but undisclosed apparently significant benefits to Google which seemingly given the repeated focus on Blogger+ were most valuable to Google which clearly was making no effort to share at any point any of the substantial real value of its surreptitious made-to-order social media behemoth benefiting from basically trafficking in the personal and private information of its long-time Blogger participants. This served to highlight that the long-term undercurrent of the Google Blogger partnership with publishers was not partnership at all since it clearly had been developed on the premise that almost all the benefits would run to Google and would only continue to do so in either greater amounts. This is why hard-working publishers focused on creating truly high quality material were rewarded like the Ninth Amendment with basically nothing (but advice from other participants in the Google program which cost Google absolutely nothing as Google itself grew notorious for never even responding but once in a blue moon to any queries of its millions of publishers thus costing Google next to nothing) while Google amassed a fortune in a matter of a couple decades to rival the great industrial giants of American business enterprise such as General Motors. If Google could have one word to describe the value on the Blogger+ relationships it supposedly celebrated Google's intentions as a "friend" in a circle of friends could only be described as despicable.
Publishers are encouraged to communicate via solely via Google groups with minimum interference with Google personnel presumably counting their fortunes to determine at how young an age they might retire including as to publishers basically just giving to Google what could turn out to be most valuable strategies for the most dubious honor of participating in or taking part in or more accurately being taken by the Blogger+ social media program which has been promoted by Google not without a significant degree of challenge it is conjectured due to Google's less than fully honest approach to the purposes of and the totally confusing and basically largely nonsensical spectrum of different tactics Google uses to try to bring uninterested blogger participants into the Blogger+ program in order to access their personal information without their necessarily informed consent accompanied by warnings or rather more accurately vague threats of apparently potentially serious but actually just somewhat confusing consequences for those who no longer wished to participate any longer after joining in the Blogger+ program.
Such conduct by Google therefore would some might conjecture make any purported agreements including those purporting to incorporate the non-sharing or failure of distribution of potentially huge profits from the collection of vast amounts of personal information to participants unenforceable for several reasons which by simple lay persons might reasonably be seen as fundamentally fraudulent conspiracies among other things also believe possibly may include affirmative defenses of unclean hands and laches for emphasizing what are really minimal benefits to participants while downplaying or altogether neglecting to mention or even provide any information as to the tremendous profits potentially to be gained from the great multitude of Blogger+ relationships established by Google for the unstated purpose of using existing relationships to become competitive in the hugely profitable area of "social media" players such as Facebook, Yahoo, LinkedIn and so many others.
This would be consistent with the larger evolution of Google from what was originally introduced to the world as an academically driven internet entrant to yet another internet behemoth arguably driven first and foremost by profit or perhaps more accurately greed fueled in many cases by the unsuspecting participants in its ever-expanding endeavors using the human capital of basically unknowing and unconsenting participants giving up private and personal information through Google's basically disguised endeavors much like those of, for example, of what have become some of the world's other richest corporations which but for their relationships with for example the CIA and other "national security" agencies who benefit greatly from their information collection may well be poster children for antitrust and privacy invasion actions such as has been demonstrated by hugely costly rulings against the likes of Facebook and Google by European regulators or in the case of Google the European Union's highest court of last resort.
This court's far-reaching reputation links privacy ruling Google's attorneys curiously failed to comment on because they had "not yet reviewed the decision" which seems a somewhat disingenuous response given that the ruling of a "court of last resort" is subject neither to rehearing nor to any appeal whatsoever since there is no higher court. It is in other words "Final" thus the moniker "Court of Last Resort". Hopefully Google did not have to pay too much for outside counsel that was capable of responding with a straight face to such decisions that it could not comment on their impact on Google since counsel had not yet had the opportunity to review them. Those legal fees after all could have gone to hard-working "bloggers" or unknowing new members of "Blogger+" to compensate them for their personal information they did not know was being collected and no doubt added to Google's bottom line.
Persons familiar with the origins of Google in its formative pre-beta stages we vaguely recall to be reported to be the revolutionary brainchild of an MIT professor and developed there by him with some of his MIT students its unique brilliance that it ranked results on the basis of supposedly objective URL-to-URL links promising to give users an unparalleled purity of results not sullied by the rank corruption of secret payoffs, other not so obviously manipulated but reflecting equally crass commercial objectives nor the product of more refined manipulation (now blossomed into an apparently fully legitimate industry of "search engine optimization" accompanied by checklists of sequential steps one takes manually or with computer assistance entering URLs into various directories and totally distorting through "backlinks" for trade and sale the long-discarded original elegant Google concept) by computer hacks skewing search results through more obscured techniques nevertheless delivering equally tainted results in an search result environment where pagerank has long become synonymous with dollars.
Conceptualization of these practices as the modern variation of starting one's business name with a long series of the letter "A" for purposes solely of telephone business page top position placement helps remove some of the "computer IT" mystery to help understand such practices as are being employed to "coax" desired commercial results from search engines. Interested readers are referred to other sources as close as the Wikepedia box to the lower right due to the Ninth Amendment's admitted lack of detailed knowledge and unavailability of its limited resources to more fully research the nascent Google and its subsequent history as being the tale of one more most desirable top academic institution's darling of The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal that was priceless to what might ever be bought from a PR firm or advertising agency or it had to be Reputation.com crafting what one would have the world believe one is rather than what one actually has become.
Presumably even Reputation.com after it deletes all one's bad news must have at least some small tatters of arguably good or at least neutral news left to which some modest shreds can be attached as to one's remaining personality and character, although alternatively there may be other "Reputation Plans" available for more difficult cases such as (1) creating large numbers of potential positive entries that might be reasonably successful in systematically establishing a somewhat better reputation such as for example in the case of Texas Governor Rick Perry upping his charitable church contributions a couple years back when he "earned" a reported $1 million as Governor from $80 to $90, to (2) taking bad entries that otherwise are not susceptible to being scrubbed and having them attributed to as an as unyet unacknowledged minor child whose parents might be amenable to a modest payment for having their name legally changed to your own but followed by a "Junior", "II" , or "III" (the second perhaps being preferable as more broadly susceptible to confusion and the third perchance even more desirable as even more susceptible to confusion) followed by having some keepers of records and so on contacted and not trying to shirk "reputation responsibility" but "come clean" and have one's name corrected to the "Junior", "II", or "III" as the case may be, and finally (3) having one's name legally changed to someone other party's name (but not "identity" as that might probably be illegal though maybe not if they are deceased and done using their identity), or having one's name changed to a new one that they have made up altogether.
We have seriously digressed here which will very soon be remedied as the reason reputations come to mind so readily with Google is that everything Google now does for all appearances is completely antithetical to all the principles for which it was claimed that Google would stand in stark contrast to the increasingly commercial and privacy invasive computer and spy world Google was in fact entering. Google's true colors however soon came out as at the top and side of its results soon appeared those highlighting results that were "sponsored" by payments to Google rather than "linked" by their usefulness to people. Contrary to the high principles which it claimed to embrace with its use of links for results positioning to the contrary Google became associated with all sorts of efforts to achieve high rank by parties willing to spend money to do do and rumors of algorithms and different techniques for achieving high ranks on Google searches became all the commercial rage with former Google employees widely known to hire themselves out for just that purpose. All sorts of enterprises were born devoted to one's achieving the highest Google position possible with no regard whatsoever for the actual quality or value of a site to users, nor in many cases even it use of the English language or the quality of its writing.
As Google expanded from its search engine beginnings it became the antithesis of all for which it once claimed to stand. Its goal rapidly developed into misusing the information available to it through its search engine to collect ALL information on its users searches, keeping a permanent record of them, and it shortly had joined in the competition to become yet another internet behemoth increasing its value by using new methods of compiling ever more information on its users with legal notices that came out in such excruciating detail and with such rapidity that like Facebook it was collecting information at and beyond the very limits of what was permissible at the same time starting to emulate the megalomania of the ever stranger head of Facebook rumored CIA tool Zuckerboy who developed fascinations in no time worthy of J. Edgar Hoover.
Zuckerboy compiled information on his "social media" site using facial recognition technology and any new twisted idea which came to mind to gather more information of what once purported to be nothing more than a friendly facilitator of social interaction but in fact became a cataloger of persons from around the globe with an unhealthy interest in connecting their recognition physically to their name to their contacts to their hobbies to "what was on their mind". Facebook made so much money that billion dollar fines from European regulators outraged at Zuckerboy's invasions of their privacy were hardly even noticed by him, an were probably reimbursed anyway by American taxpayers through the CIA's or some similar outfit's black ops budget. Perhaps Facebook even had its own.
Google having long before abandoned all its higher principles kept its innocent-seeming goofiness in its name alone. Not to be outdone by Facebook Google soon found that it sound had a secret investor in the CIA through a front company in the NYSE. Later all pretense was merely set aside and the CIA just openly invested with Google in a joint venture. Google and CIA built data storage facilities adjacent to one another, it being clear that Google's rapacious gathering of information through the required entering by its users of one I.D. for all its acquisitions, its collection of all information legally possible on it users, and in fact everything it did now being directed to collecting ever more information on individuals and metadata on everything was the C.I.A., F.B.I., N.S.A. and all the others of the rapidly growing number of "National Security" outfits now numbering probably between fifteen and twenty dream come true.
What the State outfits could not legally access or collect they could barely believe their luck in having Americans grown up to believe in a government that followed the law and the U.S. Constitution now willing to go forward with whatever they could get anyone to sign off on their using. And the use of private counterparts such as Facebook using facial recognition technology and Google actually mapping and invading the premises by camera of nearly every house on the earth through open windows and from above was like their dream come true.
What possible legitimate reason could private outfits like Google and Facebook have for this massive invasion of privacy without subjects consent and/or explained in such a way as to be as incomprehensible as adhesion insurance contracts thrown out by the courts years ago. Enough of today's digression and we shall wrap back around to Blogger. Blogger perhaps once of somewhat innocent intentions certainly no longer is that. Every other new appearance on a Blogger or Google screen is yet another attempt to trick a person without their informed consent of signing on for Blogger+ as Google is just so eager to have another route of invasion to person's private lives. It has very little to nothing to producing a blog of quality. It has everything to do with endless promises of meaningless advantages to signing on, sharing more information with Google, identifying circles of friends, or rather creating them as Google takes it upon itself to do far more than keep meaningless records of all its users do, it clearly would like to control what they do, to tell them who their friends are, to use any deceptive device at its disposal to get more persons to sign on to enable them to do basically do nothing except make it that much easier for Google to get every last bit of information about the lives of those who use Google. Google thirsts for "social media" privacy invasion that can rival Facebook's.
Soon Google will have to be left behind for those who are not tools of the CIA and all their law-breaking friends. In the meantime Google at least with this site's blogger statistics is blazing the path for misinformation, disinformation, and in seven years has never responded to a single feedback message sent from this site. And how much has this site collected having been long ago accepted to Adsense, Amazon and other affiliate program"900s? This site's publisher has in seven years not yet received its first advertising paymemt. So in any case Google one might think Google could supply those site performance statistics in something close to real time. Half a day late and confusing Albania for Argentina just does not cut it when you are playing with the Big Boys.
Keep that up and in no time the CIA will have you preparing the final reports for the President on the presence of WMDs. Or maybe the next nuclear missile silo exercise gone awry in Nebraska. You have to prove yourself worthy Google even if you do have a satellite map of the whole earth, a picture taken from 360 degrees outside every person's house in the world, a record of everyone's last five thousand Google searches, copies of all their private pictures and family photo albums, and a list of the everything they have watched and listened to on YouTube since Google bought it, next thing you know the CIA will ask you to keep a record for them of every number called and kept on everyone's Android phone because the Supreme Court told the CIA and the NSA you know even this Court must draw the line somewhere therefore that is not allowed, especially so long as Mr. Justice Thomas is on the bench with his suspected propensity for "900" numbers.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
21 June 2014
The Ninth Amendment Editorial Board Requests Developers Or Readers Please Reflect Upon Whether Google Were "Servicing" Their Commercial , Institutional or Personal Website Or Blog Readers Or Developers Or Readers Would Find Statistical Reporting On The Google-Supported Site Such As That Below To Be Either Helpful, Confidence Inspiring Or Believable In Terms Of Google's Capacity For Timeliness, Truthfulness And/Or Accuracy?
|
Saturday, 21 June 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA - Another workday dawns at 1600 hours West Coast time for the hard-working Google former grade-school hackers turned gainfully employed computer specialists, social media provocateurs, disinformation statisticians, airwave toxicologists (why not?), national security analysts and others desperately speed dialing, tapping into phone lines and/or drone eavesdropping on the VIP rooms of last evening all-night rave clubs to casually inquire if they might locate that prototype "Summer of Love" necklace they accidentally wore home featuring the new microcomputer application and style statement cabinetry that Google was under contract to build for the CIA to turn those Androids disguised as love beads into combination antibiotic-sickened farm animal video games with TrueSmell,military-grade GPS drone "Swing Low Sweet Chariot" targeting systems, tiny little decapitation "Peace Sign" grenade beads, high-end MP3 players with professional quality headphones featuring improved Dr. Dre SuperBeatBass now producing sound out of both the left and right channels simultaneously, and of course pirated Samsung smartypantsphones with Google satellite-quality cameras and Walgreen's long-range SuperSnoop microphones for HackerChat all of which is designed to blow up in a "smallish" simulated pyrotechnical explosion capable of leveling one square city block down to a depth of 300 feet beneath Manhattan's granite bedrock if not recovered and disarmed (important "two-step" bothersome but important "two-step" verification required) by Google child geniuses within twelve hours of reported "MOP" (misplacement of prototype) but if not featuring minimal collateral damage by first playing the chorus of the Village People's "Y-M-C-A" amplified at roughly the decibel level of the area behind an unpiloted F-35's (because all fighter pilots refuse to fly them as pilots stubbornly insist that flying while unconscious is inherently unsafe) jet engine firing up for lift-off from the George Herbert Walker Bush aircraft carrier.
Then sometime after all those loose ends are tied up from the previous "day's" activities some intern might be sent to read the bloggers, website owners and that crowd's usual couple million worldwide complaints about "known issues" and try a quick "workaround" until it is time for the gang to head off to the next houseparty. In any case the Ninth Amendment is not presently in a position to determine if statistics as graphed above have any basis in reality whatever that is, but as their somewhat obvious irregular rhythms have come to characterize Google's daily reported statistics for the site the Ninth Amendment Editorial Board has developed a certain amount of curiosity as to whether others may be having similar experiences with Google as late and if so wishes to encourage them to lay it on that "Send feedback" to Google invitation at the bottom of the screen..
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
16 June 2014
Google Still Fails To Maintain Server Integrity, Technical Support And/Or Operating Statistics Of Google Blogger Sub-Domain Sites
Monday, 16 June 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA - Despite now daily reports by the editorial board of the Ninth Amendment of detailed worsening "problems" (Google's term) sent by this Blogger publisher via Google's official route of providing real-time Blogger feedback Google has provided neither any explanation, other response, nor apparently done anything nor taken any steps effective to address any of the many worsening Google Blogger technical and support deficiencies even presumably with the assistance of its CIA partner available.
Although the many irregularities brought to the attention of the Ninth Amendment by statistical reporting clearly completely inconsistent with historical performance of the site would appear to be directly temporally related to the appearance of referring URL and site webchat.freenode.com the originally apparently well-intentioned open source IRC since overtaken apparently by the sordid more recent history detailed in earlier posts here, because this has not been confirmed nor its purpose here identified, the Ninth Amendment will follow its normal procedure of keeping more posts current for longer periods of time so as to have any attempt to stifle its freedom of speech, reporting, publication or keeping information from its readers in fact any interference therefore will have the opposite result of keeping posts up longer to insure that as many readers as possible may access them whether they concern rampant Texas GOP corruption, national security blunders and hypocrisy, or whatever subject on which information has been posted here, should readers wish to do so including being encouraged as desired to further investigate such matters and draw readers' own conclusions from whatever material they may encounter and assess.
The Ninth Amendment sincerely apologizes to the extent that such actions may seem to distract the Ninth Amendment from reporting on the many diverse newsworthy often obscure other current affairs not readily available to readers either not at all or largely buried in mostly meaningless popular and/or misleading news reports commonly appearing in many other sources in the "mass media". Readers should be assured that problems which Google may be experiencing with its own Blogger server integrity are not and should not be expected to have any impact on the functioning or performance of legitimate readers' own communications and computer equipment nor be related to any gathering of any type of any specific reader identifying information which is of course completely antithetical to the principles espoused and committed to by the Ninth Amendment editorial board of the free exchange of information and NOT the completely conterproductive and unconstitutional collection of data, metadata, and/or the illegal brokering of such private and protected individuals' information.
The Ninth Amendment does not wish to spend your tax dollars and have the audacity to call this "work" watching your daughters dress for high school from helicopters and drones in the sky, video cameras hidden in your homes, nor listen to them chatting on the phone nor internet nor listening in on members of readers' families eating dinner by spooking around the curtilage of our readers' homes nor pointing lasers and focusing them on readers' vehicles, homes, commerical establishiments and office windows. Much like when tornadoes approach probably the best place to be is in a heavily reinforced shelter with as many interior walls as possible with plenty of plumbing and as deep underground as possible as the drones ride the twister.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Although the many irregularities brought to the attention of the Ninth Amendment by statistical reporting clearly completely inconsistent with historical performance of the site would appear to be directly temporally related to the appearance of referring URL and site webchat.freenode.com the originally apparently well-intentioned open source IRC since overtaken apparently by the sordid more recent history detailed in earlier posts here, because this has not been confirmed nor its purpose here identified, the Ninth Amendment will follow its normal procedure of keeping more posts current for longer periods of time so as to have any attempt to stifle its freedom of speech, reporting, publication or keeping information from its readers in fact any interference therefore will have the opposite result of keeping posts up longer to insure that as many readers as possible may access them whether they concern rampant Texas GOP corruption, national security blunders and hypocrisy, or whatever subject on which information has been posted here, should readers wish to do so including being encouraged as desired to further investigate such matters and draw readers' own conclusions from whatever material they may encounter and assess.
The Ninth Amendment sincerely apologizes to the extent that such actions may seem to distract the Ninth Amendment from reporting on the many diverse newsworthy often obscure other current affairs not readily available to readers either not at all or largely buried in mostly meaningless popular and/or misleading news reports commonly appearing in many other sources in the "mass media". Readers should be assured that problems which Google may be experiencing with its own Blogger server integrity are not and should not be expected to have any impact on the functioning or performance of legitimate readers' own communications and computer equipment nor be related to any gathering of any type of any specific reader identifying information which is of course completely antithetical to the principles espoused and committed to by the Ninth Amendment editorial board of the free exchange of information and NOT the completely conterproductive and unconstitutional collection of data, metadata, and/or the illegal brokering of such private and protected individuals' information.
The Ninth Amendment does not wish to spend your tax dollars and have the audacity to call this "work" watching your daughters dress for high school from helicopters and drones in the sky, video cameras hidden in your homes, nor listen to them chatting on the phone nor internet nor listening in on members of readers' families eating dinner by spooking around the curtilage of our readers' homes nor pointing lasers and focusing them on readers' vehicles, homes, commerical establishiments and office windows. Much like when tornadoes approach probably the best place to be is in a heavily reinforced shelter with as many interior walls as possible with plenty of plumbing and as deep underground as possible as the drones ride the twister.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
15 June 2014
Returning webchat.freenode.net Pageview Interference Demonstrates Google Failure To Secure Blogger Face Loss Begs CIA Boss Rescue
Sunday, 15 June 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA - After the absence of webchat.freenode.net identified as a suddenly new dominating appearance in URL and site referring statistics to the Ninth Amendment of late coinciding exactly with anomalous numbers of pageviews suddenly lacking most usual other countries' readers along with the rather improbable nature of posts of interest reported visited such as those from several years past, when the Ninth Amendment presently currently offers readers timely posts on significant current national security policy inconsistencies and an astounding number of gripping incidents of "dark money" Texas Republicans apparently wideapread illegal misconduct and "Tea Party" infighting, webchat.freenode.net traffic now has made a coordinated but much limper reappearance after a complete absence for days by persons presumably who prefer to remain low as unnamed members of groups such as the previously unknown self-proclaimed "Gay Nigger Association of America" and further calling to mind and keeping alive the memory of the mysteriously coincidental criminal killing of Rob Levin who originally established the open source IRC network for much different reasons than its apparent present "freenoded" custodians.
In any case Google-once-CIA partner and no doubt inevitable CIA front and errand boy as soon as such time as the CIA makes the unilateral decision that such a change in hierarchical relationship has become necessary due to the almighty "national security" trump card seems for the moment unable to even maintain the basic security and integrity of its own mere billions member money-making Blogger sub-domain much to the continuing disappointment of the Ninth Amendment editorial board and its readers, to whom the Ninth Amendment itself is committed to maintaining the security and integrity of its diverse readers own legitimate site visits as well as their privacy to the best of its ability with no purpose other than to excite independent thought and exposure to significant newsworthy information to which readers might not otherwise be so readily introduced and encouraged to themselves investigate preferably first-hand sources when readers find themselves so inclined.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
In any case Google-once-CIA partner and no doubt inevitable CIA front and errand boy as soon as such time as the CIA makes the unilateral decision that such a change in hierarchical relationship has become necessary due to the almighty "national security" trump card seems for the moment unable to even maintain the basic security and integrity of its own mere billions member money-making Blogger sub-domain much to the continuing disappointment of the Ninth Amendment editorial board and its readers, to whom the Ninth Amendment itself is committed to maintaining the security and integrity of its diverse readers own legitimate site visits as well as their privacy to the best of its ability with no purpose other than to excite independent thought and exposure to significant newsworthy information to which readers might not otherwise be so readily introduced and encouraged to themselves investigate preferably first-hand sources when readers find themselves so inclined.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
13 June 2014
Google Blogger Fails To Report Reliable Accurate Site Statistics Nor Effectively Address Site Pageview Interference And/Or Reports Exposing Vulnerabilities Of Publishers' and Advertisers' Privacy
Friday, 13 June 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA - Despite many recent and increasing requests by the editorial board of the Ninth Amendment log Google has declined to comment and/or provide information on why this New American log's site pageview statistics have in recent weeks steadily declined either in accuracy and/or to identify whether site viewership now is suffering interference and/or denial of access as the result of the misconduct of other parties or that in which Google is complicit, has knowledge of, and/or lacks the ability to remedy.
Statistics which have appeared to be reliable as suggested by consistency with historical site performance now increasingly are being reported as totally inconsistent for periods lasting as long periods approaching on half a day suggesting Google can no longer maintain the performance standards Google originally established in order to attract publishers and advertisers to its highly lucrative Blogger and Blogger-related endeavors including Google's expansion into the extremely data brokering area of "social media" information collection and sharing particularly through its innocuously named "plus" feature.
As reported by Google itself this information is not only available to its CIA partner but through its "hub" and other "features" for purposes of exchanging it with other popular social media sites with an obviously extremely aggressive emphasis on its "plus" feature to which Google has gone to great lengths to draw in existing publishers who currently do not participate nor wish to participate in this personal information collection vehicle.
Publishers and advertisers wishing to publish and/or advertise on blogs or other popularly accessible web page creation and maintenance outlets will readily find that there now are a great many other entities available providing similar or better services at little or no cost including those based in other countries including those of the European Union which have demonstrated as documented in earlier posts on this New American site significantly greater respect for and legal protections for individuals' privacy regardless of the individuals' home countries.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Statistics which have appeared to be reliable as suggested by consistency with historical site performance now increasingly are being reported as totally inconsistent for periods lasting as long periods approaching on half a day suggesting Google can no longer maintain the performance standards Google originally established in order to attract publishers and advertisers to its highly lucrative Blogger and Blogger-related endeavors including Google's expansion into the extremely data brokering area of "social media" information collection and sharing particularly through its innocuously named "plus" feature.
As reported by Google itself this information is not only available to its CIA partner but through its "hub" and other "features" for purposes of exchanging it with other popular social media sites with an obviously extremely aggressive emphasis on its "plus" feature to which Google has gone to great lengths to draw in existing publishers who currently do not participate nor wish to participate in this personal information collection vehicle.
Publishers and advertisers wishing to publish and/or advertise on blogs or other popularly accessible web page creation and maintenance outlets will readily find that there now are a great many other entities available providing similar or better services at little or no cost including those based in other countries including those of the European Union which have demonstrated as documented in earlier posts on this New American site significantly greater respect for and legal protections for individuals' privacy regardless of the individuals' home countries.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
18 September 2013
NOTICE TO READERS: Originally Blogger-Supplied "Chat Room" Gadget Removed To Maintain Site Technical Integrity
Wednesday, 18 September 2013, ANN ARBOR, MI - The Ninth Amendment Editorial Board apologizes to readers for any inconvenience caused by the removal of the originally Blogger-supplied "Chat Room" gadget in order to help maintain the technical integrity of the Ninth Amendment log and keep it a safe place for all readers to visit. The feature may be available through other routes including possibly other Blogger.com "blogs". The Ninth Amendment thanks you for your understanding.
Copyright 2013 Big M and Proud M All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Copyright 2013 Big M and Proud M All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)