Showing posts with label youth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label youth. Show all posts

08 January 2015

Active Aged 55-79 Women And Men Who Are "Serious Recreational" Per Below Bicycle Riders Found By The Journal Of Physiology Study To Have Physical And Cognitive Abilities Such That "They Did Not Show Their Age" Morever Based On Their Testing "Dataset" It Would Be "Impossible" For A Clinician To Predict Their Age Because "On Paper They All Look Young"

      Thursday, 8 January 2015, NEW YORK, NEW YORK - A new study  on the effects of aging published this week in The Journal of Physiology reached the surprising conclusion this week that active older people resemble much younger people physiologically. What they found is what we presently assume about the inevitability of physical decline with advancing years may be incorrect and "that how we age is, to a large degree, up to us".
       They found that more mature active adults in the 55-79 age range who exercised by bicycling as "serious recreational riders but not competitive athletes" rather than resembling people their own age on standard tests instead were more like people who were much younger physiologically.
       In order to qualify the men in six and a half hours had to be able to ride at least 62 miles (that is just less than ten miles per hour) while the women in five and a half hours had to be able to ride at least 37 miles (that is about seven miles per hour). These are indicators of what typically is found to be in older people a "high degree of fitness".
       As part of the study volunteers who were and were not at this "high degree of fitness" measured through cylcing went through a variety of physical and cognitive tests. This group of cyclists afterwords simply not only "did not show their age" but instead showed stable functioning from passing of decade to decade and which "was much closer to that of young adults than of people their age." Even the oldest among the cyclists "had younger people’s levels of balance, reflexes, metabolic health and memory ability".
       But even more encouraging was that it was their "Timed Up and Go" test results "that were exemplary". On average at least 7 seconds were needed by older people to accomplish this, and those needing 9 to 10 seconds considered "to be on the cusp of frailty". Incredibly among the cyclists even the oldest on average took just five seconds to get up and walk which remarkably is “'well within the norm reported for healthy young adults'”.
       In sum the senior author of the study who is the director of the Centre of Human and Aerospace Physiological Sciences at King’s College London Dr. Stephen Harridge concluded that “'[if] you gave this dataset to a clinician and asked him to predict the age'” based on one of the test cylcists' test results he said “'it would be impossible.'”  Gretchen Reynolds author of the New York Times "Well" Column linked to below concludes that "[o]n paper, they all look young". 
       Finally for the information of interested readers there has been another quite recent study unfortunately to which the Ninth Amendment cannot at this time provide either a direct link nor a citation that has reached a similar conclusion to that above as to "serious recreational" bicycle riders for mature adults who rather than walk instead merely jog at the slowest of paces even taking walking breaks as necessary whereby their physiological test scores put them on a par with that of the average college student. That certainly sounds encouraging to us.
Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Exclusively Reserved 

01 May 2014

Texas Rejects Federal Prison Rape Standards As Idiot Governor Rick "Payback" Perry Refuses Certification Of State Prisons

     Thursday, 1 May 2014, AUSTIN, TEXAS - Should some of our readers find dwelling on prisoner-on-prisoner rape including that of youths hard to stomach, these readers are assured it is not pleasant to have to report. Regardless of what the The Ninth Amendment editorial board and some others may think of what a society (in this case the people of state of Texas) presumably sees as just punishments including any expected resultant suffering from due process of law as set forth in the United States and state constitutions, we find deplorable conditions which reasonably may be avoided that can be expected to inflict further suffering even worse than the original punishment while in the State's custody to be repugnant to fundamental  principles of justice and humanity.
     Texas Idiot Lame-Duck Governor Rick "Payback" Perry last week at least briefly turned his attention to the state he governs long enough to refuse Texas' certification that it meets minimum federal prison standards to reduce prisoner-on-prisoner rapes including segregation of 17-year-old youths sentenced as adults from adult prison populations.
     "If You Ain't Got The Bucks, You're Sh*t Out Of Luck" Perry asserted that Texas has its own prisoner-on-prisoner rape reduction standards of some sort which he apparently deems a sufficient substitute at least theoretically for the federal standards he rejects. Whatever the Texas standards might be the result is that more than one of the State's prisons has been reported to have among the highest prisoner-on-prisoner rape rates in the country.
     Nor reportedly does the State segregate 17-year-old youths sentenced as and serving time as adults from the rest of the older general adult population in Texas state prisons. Should this be the case the Ninth Amendment lacks information and is at a loss to explain how this seemingly clear downward deviation from minimum federal standards which specifically require for obvious reasons youths' segregation from older adult prisoners could possibly not be and/or has not been recognized by the State as anything but a failure under whatever state standard as it has not achieved the unambiguous result of segregating 17-year-olds from adult inmates.
     The Ninth Amendment encourages the people of the State of Texas to remain informed and aware of the decisions and actions on such important issues by those they have chosen to govern their great state and will be mindful when making future choices as to those persons elected to govern Texas what decisions and actions those candidates reasonably may be expected to make on a wide range of major issues which will affect most every one of those voters, their future generations, as well as all their fellow Texans including those who for various reasons cannot vote.

Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved