Showing posts with label cybersecurity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cybersecurity. Show all posts

07 September 2017

Bribes GOP Mulvaney Demands Rips Off Fed Workers Is #1 Enemy Of Working People Equifax Sleazeball Swamp Scum Trump Corruption Poster Boy Tea Party Co-Founder Mulvaney Violates Constitutional Oath Destroys The CFPB Consumer Enemy #1 "Prick" Mulvaney In Payday Payoff Ends CFPB Enforcing Equifax Admits 2017 Breach Worse +2.4 Million Total 147.9 Million Info Exposed Probe Equifax Gut CFPB Acting Head GOP Hack Mulvaney Attacks Consumers Net Privacy Breach EU Fine Greater 4% Global Annual Turnover / $24.5 Million Trump Anti-Consumer CFPB Win Before Trump Newly Appointed Judge Kelly CFPB Deputy Sues To Lead CFPB Over Consumer Enemy GOP Hack Mulvaney Trump Consumer Enemy Mulvaney Makes Illegal CFPB Head Power Grab Try CFPB Exit Head Cordray Trump GOP Chance To Hobble Consumer Protection Equifax Former CEO Congress Testimony No Fix For Five Months After Notice Data Breach Equifax 143+ Million U.S. Consumers' Information Compromised Every Consumer 1 Year Free Credit Monitor, Freeze And Identity Theft Protect Most Recent Best Steps Freeze Protect Credit And Personal Data Links Below

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2018-05-21

“The Swamp” by John Cuneo
UPDATES to 15 May 2018   TOP HEADLINES SEE BELOW TOP LINKS GOP SLEAZEBALL SCUM SUCKER MULVANEY ENEMY #1 OF FED WORKERS CFPB CONSUMERS OMB BUDGETS LIAR TO ALL AMERICANS

       Tuesday, 3 October 2017 UPDATED / Thursday, 7 September 2017, New York, NY - Equifax credit reporting agency today disclosed that on 29 July 2017 Equifax discovered that from mid-May through July 2017 an Equifax website application "weak point" was exploited in a cyberattack data breach that compromised 143 million U.S. consumers' Social Security numbers, birth dates, addresses, and some driver's license and other sensitive information leaving it for months vulnerable to hackers. Hackers were able to steal credit card numbers of 209,000 consumers. Dispute document personal information of 182,000 consumers was taken as well. Equifax disclosed also some personal information of an unspecified number of Canadian and British residents was stolen.
       The bad faith of Equifax is amply demonstrated several times over including as reported by NBC news that the same day Equifax finally publicly disclosed the massive consumer data breach on 7 September 2017 that it had learned of more than five weeks before on 29 July 2017 that Equifax was lobbying on Capitol Hill for a reduction in the already lax regulation of credit reporting agencies and their liability in cases of security breaches exposing consumer financial and other sensitive data.
       Equifax said it has found no evidence of unauthorized activity on its main consumer or commercial credit reporting databases. The company website says that worldwide it has data on more than 820 million consumers and 91 million businesses and information on employees from more than 7,100 businesses. Equifax says in addition to reporting the breach to law enforcement with the F.B.I. now investigating Equifax also has hired an unidentified cybersecurity firm to determine the "scale of the invasion" which investigation it expects to be complete "within the next few weeks." Equifax will pay for one year free credit monitoring and identity theft protection for all U.S. consumers who request it also with additional data risk information at  www.equifaxsecurity2017.com.
       The third link below is the New York Times article reporting the Equifax data breach with preliminary information including the website above. The fourth link below is Consumer Reports free advice on what every consumer should do when visiting the website. The fifth link below reports the New York Attorney General (AG) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau concerns against using the Equifax site as it requires too much information and the fine print may waive consumer rights to sue Equifax. In the sixth link below Equifax responds that those fine print terms do no apply in this help site case but former NJ Deputy AG says do not take Equifax marketing department advice for this as contract terms control. At the seventh link below the more recent New York Times article provides updated directions accounting for further developments at Equifax in response to the breach as to what steps one should take now to protect credit and personal information as best as even if imperfectly possible against misuse. The eighth link below details concerns about security of the PIN provided to unfreeze credit reports after one freezes them. The ninth link sets out how to freeze credit reports at each major agency.
       Unfortunately it appears that some Equifax executives despite its own catastrophic recklessness in not protecting data which consumers did not willingly provide to Equifax in the the first place nor request it to store may have exercised Equifax stock options and sold before the breach announcement was made public in addition to the Equifax "help" website requesting excessive information with fine print at least initially until overwhelming public outcry requiring consumers to waive the legal right to sue Equifax. Readers can go to the tenth link below for further information about developments related to officials' responses to the Equifax breach including Senate Banking Committee Democratic U.S. Senator Heidi Heitkamp's assertion that if executives who exercised options and sold Equifax stock did so with knowledge of the breach before the public that "somebody needs to go to jail."
       The eleventh link below is a further New York Times report that Equifax will provide free credit freezes on Equifax when requested within thirty (30) days (since reported to be free for Equifax freezes when requested by 21 November 2017) although the Times has not had all its questions and requests to Equifax as well as TransUnion and Experian answered to its satisfaction. At link twelve three major questions about the degree of inadequacy of Experian computer security are posed in the Washington Post's next article below although no further instructions are provided to protect the security of one's information.
       The Washington Post's next article at link thirteen below has all information for a chatbot that provides one's personal small claims court lawsuit papers free which filing should not preclude also joining a class action suit. Equifax seemingly has tried to deflect responsibility for apparent negligence or recklessness in not having sufficiently secured such highly sensitive information by referencing a vulnerability in a "website application". That reference by Equifax is to a vulnerability in its Apache security software which Apache rebuffed stating it identified the vulnerability and immediately provided a patch in March 2017 months before the Equifax breach began which Equifax had failed to install. A PBS article with credit/ID expert advice video is at link thirteen below.
       CFPB UPDATE Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Director Richard Cordray has announced he is resigning from his five-year term early. The CFPB has developed over the past seven years into an agency with a robust enforcement division. The CFPB has forced the biggest banks in the country to return over $12 billion directly to families the banks cheated. The CFPB hotline which remains in operation has handled over 1 million telephone complaints including on behalf of families against Wells Fargo Bank for its huge transgressions as well as serving as a major advocate of consumers with complaints against Equifax and others such as debt collectors.
       The CFPB has been under constant attack by the GOP Congress for its role as the one consumer protection agency left standing with Director Cordray called ceaselessly before GOP-controlled congressional committees to be subjected to relentless harassment by GOP congress members outraged that there is any federal entity left standing that actually represents the interests of the American people rather than those strongly favored by the GOP because they own it and bought all its members their "elected" seats such as predatory payday, student loan, bank, financial "services", pre-paid and other credit card issuer lenders and other such consumer predators.
       The GOP congress earlier reversed a CFPB rule with phony Christian Mike "Serial Liar" Pence ('lil Mike you just cannot be both at once) breaking a 50-50 Senate tie vote that would have forbid predatory financial institutions from forcing consumers to "agree" to be subjected to industry-biased arbitration and forced to give up their constitutional right to a trial by jury in a court of law. The GOP now is salivating at the opportunity for President Trump to appoint an official to head the CFPB who can gut its work protecting consumers a further reminder link below that every day Trump and the GOP are in power is another day piling on giant setbacks for the American people to whom to whom the Trump GOP lie every day. Readers interested in Director Cordray's early departure this month from the CFPB can go to the first link below.
       UPDATES Trump attempts in Trump WH Thanksgiving weekend night "news dump" to name Trump #1 anti-consumer WH "Trillion Dollar Deficit" Budget Director  Mulvaney interim CFPB "Swamp King"  under authority Trump did not have the interim position under statute going to CFPB Deputy Director Leandra English whom Cordray named before his early departure who under statute serves until a Senate confirmation of a new CFPB Director. Not to be encumbered by the law the Trump WH nevertheless named sleaze Mulvaney to the interim position leaving the CFPB with apparent dueling heads. CFPB Deputy Director English supported by the Dodd-Frank law creating the CFPB sued in Federal District Court for the District of Columbia for a temporary restraining order to block Trump's pick WH GOP hack uncredentialed OMB fraudster head avowed CFPB consumer enemy #1 Mulvaney the day before she was to take over the CFPB as interim Director.
       Newly Trump appointed Federal District Court Judge Timothy Kelly (surprise!) ruled in Trump's favor on the TRO allowing WH OMB Head (who as no advanced economics credentials) Mick Mulvaney also temporarily to head the CFPB which GOP hack Mulvaney has vowed to destroy because of his falsely espoused lie that it has imposed such great burdens on fine citizen banks such as criminal bank Wells Fargo and longtime criminal Bank of America. Readers interested in more information on the above updates can go to the first unnumbered first five links directly below.
       UPDATE to 5 February 2018 Anti-Consumer Consumer Financial Protection Bureau GOP Trump hack acting interim head Mick Mulvaney struck a further blow in his continuing assault on consumers gutting the CFPB investigation of Equifax, Inc. declining help from three U.S. agencies specializing in financial matters in cancelling on-site Equifax investigation and laying the groundwork for further disaster from that and other credit reporting agencies after Equifax had allowed extensive financial information of 143 million consumers to be accessed through a data breach after Equifax failed for several months after it was provided to install a patch for a vulnerability in its security software. As a consequence of the incident Equifax CEO Rogers resigned his position and took full blame in congressional testimony.
       Mulvaney in his undistinguished career as a Trump GOP hack confirmed by 51-49 the barest of Senate votes previously was the head of the White House OMB who by ineptitude or more likely intentionally in line with Trump orthodoxy vigorously defended wildly inaccurate budget predictions based entirely on political expedience unrelated to reality. Mr. Mulvaney literally forced himself into the open acting interim head position of the CFPB by getting to the open vacated office earliest in the morning contrary to a clear reading of the law (currently still the subject of a dispute) so he could immediately sabotage its operations first forbidding employees from sending out any money in the CFPB's possession for at least a month despite it belonging to and being expected by consumers paid by private entities to compensate them for having been wronged. Mulvaney requested zero dollars for the CFPB's annual budget apparently like his sponsor Trump unconcerned about fulfilling implicit obligations when charged with the duties set out under duly enacted law thereby ignoring the democratic will of the American people in violation of one's oath to the Constitution. Readers interested in more information about Mulvaney's gut of the CFPB Equifax investigation can go to one above the final link below.
       UPDATE to 1 March 2018 Equifax continued its peculiar strategy which will hopefully speed its paying out policy limits before suffering death by a thousand cuts but hopefully not before it pays out a fortune in consumer remedies including for credit locks, credit freezes, credit monitoring, credit repair and consumer damages in private and class actions including punitive damages plus wiping out all its executives and board of directors individually for their reckless and intentional unlawful misdeeds before Equifax suffers its well-earned death pulling down the whole sleezy wretched privacy invading totally incompetent "credit reporting service" industry now admitting it has known all along that it exposed another 2.4 million now totaling 147.9 million (about half) of all Americans most private and personal identification information and related data to every hacker and cyberthief who can use it or sell it on the dark web at any point for the rest of consumers' lives (unless they change their names, birthdates, social security numbers, addresses, phone numbers and so on).
       Interested readers can go to the final link below for this most recent Equifax disclosure but are advised that all intervening Equifax developments of available remedies from and/or against Equifax as well as any related information is not covered as the links following date from early after the incident was made public so interested readers are urged to follow links or do further searches to insure they have comprehensive information about all pertinent intervening Equifax breach reporting, updates, additional consumer remedies and so on without limitation as there really is no way to make Equifax and its officers and directors hurt enough for the harm they have caused American consumers but at least we can try.
       UPDATE to 7 March 2018 Consumer enemy #1 "Swamp King" Mick Mulvaney the same laughably bogus OMB head making totally BS economic forecasts from the White House with no training of merit whatsoever now guts CFPB to the delight of industry Trump government "acting in the corporate interest" in payday payoff ends all enforcement actions by CFPB with all "modesty and humility". Funny guy loser demonstrates zero integrity approach to federal government. Readers interested in more information can go to link 17 below.
       UPDATE to 27 April 2018 Tea Party co-founder publishes New York Times op-ed excoriating Trump "King of the Swamp" admitted bribe-taker CFPB destroyer and "Trillion Dollar Deficit" OMB man consumer enemy #1 scum "Prick" Mick Mulvaney poster child for exploiting endemic Trump administration corruption and calls on states to use U.S. Constitution article V amendments to take power away from hopelessly corrupt federal government and give it to the states at link immediately below.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2018/05/08/trump-thanks-federal-employees-with-143-5-billion-in-retirement-cuts/? Mulvaney OMB CFPB Enemy Of The People #1 Has OPM Head Pon Send Congress A $143.5 Billion Federal Worker Wages Now Retirement Later Rip-Off Plan For "Public Service Recognition Week"
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/27/opinion/mick-mulvaney-trump-swamp.html Tea Party co-founder uses swamp scum OMB "trillion dollar deficit" CFPB criminal Mulvaney as example why to take power away from feds
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/4/25/1759789/-Mick-Mulvaney-admits-to-taking-bribes-and-solicits-additional-bribes-while-destroying-CFPB Mulvaney Takes Bribes Solicits More From Bankers Destroys CFPB
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-facebook-sandberg-privacy/facebook-to-hand-privacy-controls-to-users-ahead-of-eu-law-idUSKBN1FC1Q6 Facebook Others EU Privacy Breach Fine Greater 4% Annual Turnover / $24.5 Million
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-cfpb/u-s-court-backs-trump-in-battle-over-interim-consumer-watchdog-head-idUSKBN1DS1KU?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtopNews+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Top+News%29 Trump Judge Kelly Rules In His Favor CFPB TRO
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/26/business/trump-cfpb-consumer-agency.html English v. Trump CFPB Suit
https://theintercept.com/2017/11/24/richard-cordray-sets-up-titanic-struggle-for-control-of-the-consumer-protection-bureau-with-last-minute-move/
o https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cfpb-cordray/trump-names-interim-consumer-agency-head-likely-sparking-showdown-idUSKBN1DO2KQ?
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/15/business/cordray-consumer-protection.html Trump now can gut CFPB
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/business/equifax-cyberattack.html Initial report Equifax help site address
https://www.consumerreports.org/privacy/what-consumers-need-to-know-about-the-equifax-data-breach/ CR free
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/09/08/what-to-know-before-you-check-equifaxs-data-breach-website/?utm_term=.5b10c7c88b3c NY Attorney / CFPB: Equifax help site use may waive rights
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/09/08/what-to-know-before-you-check-equifaxs-data-breach-website/?utm_term=.a043274a641f Equifax: Suit waiver not apply NJ Deputy AG: Do not trust Equifax
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/08/your-money/identity-theft/equifaxs-instructions-are-confusing-heres-what-to-do-now.html More recent directions to best try to protect credit and personal information from misuse
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/10/your-money/identity-theft/equifax-breach-credit-freeze.html?mcubz=1 PIN
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/09/09/after-the-equifax-breach-heres-how-to-freeze-your-credit-to-protect-your-identity/?utm_term=.e4e2fdef35e6 Credit freeze steps each major credit reporting agency
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-equifax-cyber-heitkamp/u-s-senator-on-equifax-hack-somebody-needs-to-go-to-jail-idUSKCN1BN1WN?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtopNews+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Top+News%29 U.S. Senator "Jail" needed for insider-like trades
10 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/12/your-money/equifax-fee-waiver.html?mcubz=1 Freeze free within 30 days
11 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/09/12/the-three-big-questions-equifax-hasnt-answered/?utm_term=.473c24221ef0 What security should Equifax have, what does it have and what is lacking?
12 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2017/09/12/want-to-sue-equifax-but-dont-want-to-hire-a-lawyer-this-chatbot-does-it-for-you/?utm_term=.8d397bf7c65b Chatbot fills in personal small claims lawsuit free
13 http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/affected-equifax-hack-heres-now/ PBS Video 32:27 expert advice + article
14 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-equifax-breach/equifax-failed-to-patch-security-vulnerability-in-march-former-ceo-idUSKCN1C71VY?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtopNews+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Top+News%29 Former CEO Rogers In Congress Takes Blame
15 https://in.mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idINKBN1FP0IZ Equifax probe gut by GOP hack CFPB head Mulvaney
16 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/03/01/equifax-keeps-finding-millions-more-people-who-were-affected-by-its-massive-data-breach/?utm_term=.a443f2e4ac8f Video 4:14 Equifax +2.4 million breaches
17 https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/a-year-of-rolling-back-consumer-protections/2018/03/05/e11713ca-0d05-11e8-95a5-c396801049ef_story.html?utm_term=.2a4672293b0c Consumer enemy #1 funny guy "Prick" Mulvaney in payday payoff delights industry guts CFPB ends enforcement actions.

Copyright Martin P. 2017-2018 All World Rights Expressly Reserved (no claim to image)

23 November 2016

Vote Recount President Battleground States, Security Audits, Congressional Inquiries Urges Growing Chorus Of Nonpartisan Academics And Activists In 2016 Trump "Election" Over Clinton Turned On Only 55,000 Suspect Votes In Michigan, Pennsylvania And Wisconsin Irregularities Raised With DOJ While Director Of National Intelligence Declines To Confirm Security Of Vote Refers Press To Department Of Homeland Security Which Fails To Give Response UPDATE: NY Times: "Administration Statement" Defends "Integrity" Of Vote

     Wednesday, 23 November 2016, WASHINGTON, D.C. - A growing chorus of nonpartisan academics as well as activists reportedly have voiced strong concerns about alleged statistical irregularities in voting results in key battleground states Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin where a mere shift in 55,000 votes total would give the 2016 U.S. Presidential victory to Hillary Clinton making her the 45th President of the United States. Another group of analysts led by the Voting Rights Institute's founder John Bonifaz and Professor Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan's center for computer security and society also are calling for a review of the vote.
     Meanwhile The Washington Post dismissively reports that misinformation posted by others on social media urges recipients to deluge the Department of Justice (DOJ) with requests for an investigation of voting irregularities in the alleged Trump victory apparently based on what that publication emphasizes is a misconception that DOJ would initiate any investigation based on the volume of public outcry. The Post refers to a DOJ spokesman who unsurprisingly states (untruthfully) that DOJ operates strictly on the facts, evidence and federal statutes (although anyone paying attention especially now knows that DOJ acts based on the politics of those in charge and routinely among other things ignores laws and tailors tortured bogus legal opinions as ordered) although the Post further does note that DOJ would still initiate an investigation of this election based on evidence of election or voter fraud,  intimidation, discriminatory election practices or other violations of federal law.
     Reportedly presumably based on earlier United States unprecedented government statements including by Vice-President Joe Biden of unspecified coming U.S. retaliation apparently related to extremely rare pre-election public predictions by two U.S. intelligence agencies, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), although curiously not joined by Republican operative James Comey's rogue Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), based on their "confidence" that the Russian government directed hacking largely perpetrated specifically at the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign in particular as well as raising the possible but unlikely specter of direct election interference based on "scanning and probing" of some states' "election-related systems" traced mostly to servers of a Russian company (all of which "President-elect" Trump currently -- unless he changed his mind -- claims entirely to dismiss despite receiving most highly classified national security briefing on this matter) the press yesterday requested assurance that the Director of National Intelligence was confident that the actual election indeed had been secure.
     The DNI spokesman somewhat curiously declined to provide such an assurance on the security of the election on the seemingly specious grounds that "colleagues at the DHS" (which actually is one of the 16 national intelligence and security agencies under the DNI) were "best positioned to address this." The DHS however apparently was not aware that it was so positioned because when then dutifully approached the spokesman for the "colleague" DHS which was the only other intelligence agency to have given public notice of the Russian cyber election meddling somewhat oddly gave the press and therefore the public no response at all to a request for comment. The press was not then referred to any other agency at all presumably ending the U.S. intelligence agency wild goose chase at least for the day. Nor apparently did any unnamed source surface.
     Readers interested in more information regarding the above can go to the links below. The first link below is to an article from The Guardian which details growing concerns about the presidential election results from various quarters and actions being planned and/or taken by those concerned. The second link below is to a Washington Post article which on its face confirms that it is indeed the mere 55,000 votes described above on which the Trump "victory" depends which votes if shifted to Hillary Clinton would make her the President-elect. The Washington Post notably haughty article however is more focused on and preoccupied with sleuthing the source(s) of the social media pathways claimed to be misleading with the article effectively dissuading the general public which is unlikely to have hard evidence from raising any unsubstantiated outcry to DOJ. In furtherance of this objective it paternally even notes that it is not providing the People for unstated reasons with certain of the alleged DOJ phone number(s) to call circulating in social media.
     The editorial board of the Ninth Amendment observes as to the latter position that is not necessarily in concert with the masses nor the core values of the United States Constitution encompassing in particular unequivocally the unfettered right of the People to petition the State for a redress of grievances without regard to what branch or department the People may choose to petition and on what grounds. Furthermore as a practical matter should such petitioning reach an overwhelming crescendo which also may be augmented by the related fundamental core constitutional right of the People peaceably to assemble in as large a number as they may choose to participate in person in the petitioning of the State when that assembly has amassed to the point of occupying a large area of the People's capital we would suggest that it shall once again become apparent to any organ of the State that the will of a sea of the People outside its windows or walls as the case may be shall not and will not be ignored even if strictly speaking the People have not got exactly the "right department" nor recently reviewed the procedures in the most recently amended pertinent parts of the Code of Federal Regulations.
     Given the grave domestic damage and needless international bloodshed and unconstitutional warfare and other horrific disasters of the illegitimate administration which flowed from the 2000 non-election in the Bush/Cheney coup d'etat made a fait accompli by a partisan Supreme Court the majority of whose members have shown themselves to be either mentally incompetent, deranged, brain dead, suffering from Alzheimer's, demented, living on another planet, senile and/or all of the preceding, one might expect that should something significant come of the matter set forth in this post that the People will not again tolerate such a blatantly partisan inappropriate illegitimate unconstitutional interference with the People's fundamental right to choose the President of the United States.

     UPDATES: A more recent BBC article added as a third link below for interested readers further details that groups mentioned above including data analysts joined by some lawyers find the 55,000 Trump battleground state votes suspect because Trump inexplicably performed better and Clinton worse in those locations with electronic voting machines potentially vulnerable to hacking in contrast to those with paper ballots and optical scanners definitely not subject to hacking. As vote counting still continues Clinton's popular vote lead over Trump has been steadily increasing now surpassing two million votes. For interested readers further fourth and fifth links have been added below to two articles on this matter most recently now appearing in The New York Times the latter originating from the Associated Press.

     UPDATES: The Times more recently reports that faced with the growing likelihood that all three battleground state votes will be audited and/or recounted that (unidentified without explanation) "officials" in the "administration" defend the "integrity" of the vote. The Times curiously provided no information at all as to who or where those "officials" might be or as to why they are not identified. The Times further summarily refers to the Department of Homeland Security and "other intelligence officials" pre-election predictions discounting the possibility of Russian election hacking and essentially ignores that some other irregularity might turn up in recounts and/or audits even if the earlier predictions by the DHS and DNI prove correct. Interested readers can go to this more recent article added as a sixth link below. The Times the following day did then release a "U.S. Statement on Reliability of Election Results" it had been given by a "senior administration official" on the unexplained condition of anonymity which apparently was the source for the above-referenced article but not mentioned nor provided to the public until added by a link the following day by the Times. Interested readers can read the statement at the added seventh link below.
     The Times further also reported that unsurprisingly the Hillary Clinton campaign had joined the Jill Stein initiated vote recount in Wisconsin to the extent of paying lawyers to participate in oversight and would do the same if Ms. Stein's Green Party further initiated recounts in Pennsylvania and Michigan, which has not yet completed its initial vote count. The Green Party's success in collecting what is expected to be seven million dollars in donations in a mere few days to fund recounts assuredly was made possible not mostly by Green Party supporters but by those holding out hope for a Clinton victory. Readers interested in more information on the Clinton campaign's "change of heart" to participate can go to the added eighth link below.
     The recount saga continues as more recently Trump supporters have joined the fray by mounting various challenges seeking now to stop the three state vote recounts in their tracks seemingly on the basis of whatever arguments they find most expedient in each of the different state venues and depending on what available procedures may be feasible in each state. Their motivation is unclear and their arguments as to the futility of recounts seemingly at odds with Mr. Trump's oft-repeated assertions of a "rigged election" and his more recent tweet(s) since apparently winning the election by electoral votes nevertheless claiming (without evidence) that he actually won the popular vote as well if one deducts the "millions" of fraudulent votes for Hillary Clinton who according to those who have been actually counting the votes now leads Trump by more than 2.5 million votes.
     So far as to the challenges the Trump supporters have mounted seeking to halt the three state vote recounts the different state election officials involved have all taken positions strictly without exception along partisan lines. Readers interested in more information can go to the added ninth link below. On Saturday, 3 December 2016, Jill Stein dropped a pending bid for a Pennsylvania statewide vote recount after Pennsylvania courts imposed a $1 million bond requirement to start a statewide recount which she criticized including on the grounds that petitioners were "citizens of ordinary means."
     Dr. Stein nevertheless as of Saturday evening had collected $6.9 million in donations to fund recount bids with further funds still being sought. A campaign for a much more limited recount of Pennsylvania votes in Philadelphia and other targeted areas rather than statewide is going forward. Meanwhile calling the bond requirement evidence of "antiquated" state law Jill Stein seemed to leave open the possibility of further plans for challenging the Pennsylvania vote stating that " [w]e will pursue every available remedy to ensure Pennsylvanians can trust what happened in this election." She also promised a forthcoming "major announcement" on this coming Monday morniing. Readers interested in more information can go to the tenth link below.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/hillary-clinton-election-vote-recount-michigan-pennsylvania-wisconsin

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/11/22/the-department-of-justice-is-not-going-to-conduct-a-vote-audit-based-on-your-phoned-in-outrage/?utm_term=.0e7b3bfac178

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38087150

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/us/politics/vote-count-hillary-clinton-trump.html

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016/11/23/us/politics/ap-us-election-recount-push-.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/25/us/politics/hacking-russia-election-fears-barack-obama-donald-trump.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/us/politics/us-statement-on-reliability-of-election-results.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/us/politics/clinton-camp-will-join-push-for-wisconsin-ballot-recount.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/02/us/trump-recounts-wisconsin-michigan-pennsylvania.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/03/us/jill-stein-pennsylvania-recount.html

Copyright 2016 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

05 April 2015

Sophisticated Hackattack On Anti-Censorship Tools To Circumvent Chinese Great Firewall Inserted Malicious Code Via Baidu Search To Disable GreatFire

     Sunday, 5 April 2015, WASHINGTON, D.C. - An unidentified party or entity (whose identity is widely suspected) about ten days ago used a sophisticated hackattack aimed at anti-censorship tools provided by GreatFire which allow Chinese internet users to circumvent the Chinese "Great Firewall". The attack directed the popular Chinese search function Baidu via ads to insert malicious code in websites directing unknowing visitors' browsers to flood and therefore disable the GreatFire website which hosts two anti-censorship tools reportedly for example allowing Chinese users to circumvent the Great Firewall in order to read the New York Times.
     The attack originated outside of China raising suspicions as to its origin. In addition to obvious concerns about the hackattack's stifling of free speech it also is of significant concern because it for a period disabled the widely used Github website hosting Greatfire. Github is very widely used including by many programmers and even the United States government. This is not the first time the Github website has been disabled by an attack flooding and overwhelming it.
     Readers interested in more information detailing the method of attack as well as its consequences and suspected origin can go to the below link to the Washington Post article of 27 March 2015 reporting this sophisticated hackattack.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2015/03/27/someone-hijacked-the-google-of-china-to-attack-anti-censorship-tools/?hpid=z15

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved