Showing posts with label edward j. snowden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label edward j. snowden. Show all posts

13 June 2015

N.S.A. Criminal Obama New Constitutional Violations Concise Chronicle From N.Y. Times All Report Summaries Below With Reports Expanded As Desired

     Saturday, 13 June 2015, WASHINGTON, D.C. - Greetings to all our domestic and especially our steadily growing numbers of fairly regular readers in nearly fifty countries now who should know although the next paragraph is directed to those here in the U.S. that the remainder of the post should prove worthwhile to the many who have expressed interest in the subject matter of the posts here. We are immensely grateful to all of our diverse readers who visit our site for diverse reasons from diverse locations with good intention.
     It just can be so challenging these days to try to keep up to be a good informed citizen who stays current with the relentless storm of today's government blatant abuses and less obvious ones constantly encroaching on the constitutional and other rights of the people of the U.S. and other countries of the world community often with absolutely no constitutional nor moral authority even remotely justifying illegal and unethical actions with apparent delusional impunity in areas reserved alone to the people especially given today's propensity of most any government agency to lie emphatically until its principals literally are being walked off to prison or pried out of their office due to stupendous misdeeds and or years-long scandal as the case may be. All the while we are trying to meet our many other obligations while most of all trying to set aside adequate time for the "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" for which we established our U.S. government to protect and preserve us all in the first place.
     One way of late to catch hints of Government abuses by the N.S.A. is to listen to President Obama himself as he seems to have developed the unfortunate habit of using the word "transparency" to describe his administration even as it moves especially of late further and further from that description such that it never will be used in any way to describe his legacy other than the fact that any claim to it has been a lie. One can be fairly sure of late that if the President uses that word in public or a speech his N.S.A. or some other executive agency is up to some new secret abuse to which it eventually will be outed kicking and screaming but certainly not by the Obama White House unless caught red-handed (thus of course providing an opportunity for some tortured attempt to twist it into some phony self-accolade for the Obama administration's "transparency" upon being exposed.)
     What follows is a recently published New York Times handy summary of N.S.A.  publicly known alleged changes and other activities for those unable to keep up with all the latest N.S.A. abuses (which we fear also now are now bleeding inevitably into domestic law enforcement) but wishing at least to be informed as to what has been going on that is publicly known about the N.S.A. organized in an easily readable form with the option to read further in articles expanded as desired:


(Likely superseding 2019 development N.S.A. mass surveillance halted:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/us/politics/nsa-phone-records-program-shut-down.html)


National Security Agency

News about the National Security Agency, including commentary and archival articles published in The New York Times.

CHRONOLOGY OF COVERAGE

  1. JUN. 5, 2015
    Classifed National Security Agency documents provided by Edward J Snowden indicate Obama administration, sans public notice, has expanded agency's warrantless surveillance of Americans' international internet traffic to hunt for evidence of malicious computer hacking; disclosures come at time of pernicious cyberattacks, but also of increased scrutiny of legal rights for more government surveillance. MORE
  2. JUN. 5, 2015
    Op-Ed article by Edward J Snowden expresses satisfaction that two years after he revealed extent of National Security Agency's surveillance of American citizens, there is now wide consensus that such activities were illegal and many of them have been stopped; warns that while progress has made, right to privacy is still under threat. MORE
  3. JUN. 4, 2015
    News Analysis; Pres Obama's revision of National Security Agency's phone record collection program seeks to tailor program to his own competing aims of addressing privacy concerns while preserving means of monitoring terrorist activity; in so doing, Obama has solidified his ownership of controversial program begun by predecessor George W Bush. MORE
  4. JUN. 3, 2015
    Senate passes bill scaling back federal government's extensive surveillance of American phone records, and Pres Obama signs it; legislation signifies significant overhaul of national security policy formed after 9-11 terrorist attacks, and is rebuke to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who fought forcefully against lessening government surveillance powers. MORE
  5. JUN. 3, 2015
    Sen Rand Paul's libertarian stance on national security issues, including his rather lonely fight against National Security Agency's surveillance of American citizens, has endeared him to supporters of his father Ron Paul during former congressman's past presidential bids; many of the elder Paul's backers have been slow to warm to Sen Rand Paul, questioning his commitment to his father's ultra libertarian ideals. MORE

ARTICLES ABOUT THE U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY










Germany Drops Inquiry Into Claims U.S. Tapped Angela Merkel’s Phone

The investigation over allegations of eavesdropping by the N.S.A. was ended because of a lack of concrete evidence, a federal prosecutor said.
June 13, 2015, Saturday

The German Government’s Surveillance Hypocrisy

The Germans have secretly helped the N.S.A., even as they condemned U.S. spying in Europe.
June 11, 2015, Thursday

Hackers Can Be Fought Without Violating Americans’ Rights

It is encouraging that more members of Congress have begun championing privacy in national security debates.
June 7, 2015, Sunday

Hunting for Hackers, N.S.A. Secretly Expands Internet Spying at U.S. Border

Searching for evidence of computer hacking originating abroad, the Obama administration has stepped up warrantless monitoring, documents show.
June 5, 2015, Friday

Edward Snowden: The World Says No to Surveillance

A post-terror generation is finally standing up for the right to privacy.
June 5, 2015, Friday

In Pushing for Revised Surveillance Program, Obama Strikes His Own Balance

The compromise on data collection was part of a broader tug-and-pull for President Obama, who inherited a vast national security infrastructure from President George W. Bush.
June 4, 2015, Thursday

U.S. Surveillance in Place Since 9/11 Is Sharply Limited

A bill to allow the government to restart surveillance operations, but with new restrictions, passed over the opposition of the Senate majority leader, and was signed by President Obama.
June 3, 2015, Wednesday

Rand Paul Begins to Make Believers Out of His Father’s Supporters

Backers of Ron Paul, who had been reluctant to support his son Rand, are warming up to Rand Paul’s positions on the N.S.A. and on foreign intervention.
June 3, 2015, Wednesday

Mitch McConnell’s N.S.A. Debacle

His recent fumble over the Patriot Act was the outcome of six years of ideological mindlessness.
June 2, 2015, Tuesday

In Debate Over Patriot Act, Lawmakers Weigh Risks vs. Liberty

Even if Congress restricts domestic surveillance, the counterterrorism infrastructure built in recent years has become firmly embedded in society.
June 2, 2015, Tuesday

copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights ExPressly Reserved (No Claim to New York Times Content)

12 April 2015

Facebook "Amassed The World's Largest Privately Held Database Of Consumer Biometrics Data" Claims Class-Action Lawsuit By "Hated" Law Firm Believed To Have Recovered $1 Billion For Tech Firm Privacy Violations

     Sunday, 12 April 2015, SAN FRANCISCO - In the face of longtime U.S. government lassitude in enforcing privacy, anti-trust and other laws against giant technology firms such as Facebook, Google, Amazon and a host of others big and smaller doubtless largely because of the documented complicity of most if not all giant tech firms in contributing data to continuing blatantly unconstitutional U.S. government domestic mass surveillance and data collection operations even as European regulators have pounded these tech behemoths with privacy and other violation rulings and huge fines to which big tech seems all but impervious, there is one most unlikely lawyer Jay Edelson, 43, and his most unconventional law firm Edelson PC (whose 20 lawyers reportedly wear hoodies sporting the firm's logo to work) which has been taking a leading role in class-action attacks using mostly older laws against these technology monsters based on their invasions of Americans' privacy and has earned Mr. Edelson the New York Times tribute (or condemnation depending on one's point of view) of being "if not the most hated person in Silicon Valley, very close to it" as well as earning Edelson PC an estimated $1 billion in recoveries from these companies for alleged privacy violations.
     The class-action lawsuit brought most recently by Edelson against Facebook for its allegedly "private" data collection from use of widespread facial recognition biometric technology which as reported here in an earlier Ninth Amendment post immediately had European regulators up in arms long ago yet met with a resounding silence in the U.S. is but one in a very long series of Edelson class-action lawsuits against a virtual who's-who of tech companies which also recently saw the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rule that the named plaintiff had standing in another Edelson lawsuit claiming misinformation about him was sold by Spokeo a search engine that purports to sell all the (presumably correct) information it can gather on a person to whomever wishes to pay for it. Spokeo is appealing that ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court with plenty of friendly firepower provided by lawyers for other big tech companies in the form of amici curiae (friends of the Court) briefs. Mr. Edelson noted that since the revelations of contractor Edward J. Snowden of massively unconstitutional privacy breaches by the National Security Agency (N.S.A.) that courts have been much more willing to allow cases to go forward for widespread abuses and violations of Americans' privacy rights. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reportedly finally also has picked up the pace of initiating some actions. (The unofficial U.S. government regulatory motto being: "We're slow, but we're here.")
     Meanwhile Facebook unsurprisingly vigorously denies the charges filed against it claiming that Facebook users could turn off facial recognition biometric technology (if only they knew where to look in the notoriously confusing ever "evolving" user privacy controls of that Zuckerboy enterprise). This in fact also points to a bigger issue which may be facing Edelson in the future being that merely by clicking on a box users of many computer applications allegedly now are agreeing to the extremely lengthy "terms and conditions" which increasingly somewhere buried in them contain mandatory arbitration clauses as the days seem long gone when courts actually ruled in such cases for example against insurance companies that used such (once) obviously deceptive devices as "adhesion contracts" which virtually no one read and if they did found them essentially impossible to understand and digest much less being able to have them changed in any case if they did. Nevertheless Edelson PC reportedly took on one such matter with an arbitration clause against AT&T by filing dozens of arbitration cases just to "send a message" to other tech giants (although AT&T reportedly still does have the arbitration clause in its contracts which the Ninth Amendment thankfully has not had occasion to review).
     Whatever the case Mr. Edelson and his firm would seem to be undaunted based on his interview in San Francisco in the article linked to below as well as in viewing the photographs therein showing lawyers and/or staff from Edelson PC back in Chicago engaged in a seemingly casual untroubled game on a ping-pong table which apparently occupies one corner office of the most colorfully decorated firm of the "Billion Dollar Man" who some believe a chamption of privacy rights and others just another class-action scoundrel. In full disclosure Mr. Edelson is a graduate of the University of Michigan Law School which also was attended by a member of the Ninth Amendment's editorial board albeit in a different time period with no compensation sought nor provided for the publication of this post. Readers interested in more information concerning the above including some of the more obscure statutes relied on in lawsuits brought by Edelson PC can go to the link below.
       
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/05/technology/unpopular-in-silicon-valley.html?smid=fb-share&_r=0

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

09 April 2015

Facebook European Class Action Privacy Lawsuit Due In Vienna Court Today Even As Facebook And Google Capitulate To Turkey Censorship Pressure

     Thursday, 9 April 2015, ISTANBUL, TURKEY and VIENNA, AUSTRIA - In what appears to be shaping up as a challenging week overseas for social media behemoths of United States origin first Facebook and then Google both reportedly unlike Twitter (at least early on) caved to Turkish recurring censorship pressure in order to avoid Internet bans and removed links and images and photographs as well as other visual and audio content related to leftist hostage takers last week at an Istanbul courthouse putting a gun to the head of Prosecutor Memhet Siram Kuraz whom they later killed.
     Twitter in any case is easily accessed even when "banned" by Turkish authorities by social media users using services which do not reveal their actual Internet access points and reportedly was restored to service Monday night without mention of whether it acceded to reportedly frequent Turkish censorship practices. YouTube later also was restored although Burcak Unsal, described as "an expert in digital law", in the New York Times distinguished Google from "hosting providers like Twitter or YouTube". To the extent YouTube "held out" it in any case now is owned by Google which early on caved to censorship pressure.
     Readers interested in more information on the above as well as Turkey's apparently growing Internet censorship practices extending to news organizations in that country can go to the first link provided below to the New York Times article filed from Istanbul, Turkey.
     Meanwhile BBC Technology news today reports that Facebook European Headquarters in Dublin, Ireland which registers all users outside of the United States and Canada faces in Vienna, Austria a 25,000 user class action filed lawsuit including 900 United Kingdom site users which alleges violations of European privacy laws. The claim led by Austrian "data protection campaigner" Max Schrems reportedly focuses on the way Facebook collects and forwards data as well as alleging Facebook further violates European privacy laws by its monitoring the use of the site's "Like" button.
     The suit is intended to stop "mass surveillance" by Facebook and further claims moreover that the social media giant has co-operated with the unconstitutional "PRISM" National Security Agency (NSA) mass domestic and foreign spying bulk data collection operation launched in 2007 under the claimed authority of the equally unconstitutional and reprehensible midnight garbage legislation the so-called  "Patriot Act" which even its its alleged author has said under no reading can support such activities by the NSA nor any other United States government entity. Facebook is expected to argue the Vienna court lacks jurisdiction to hear the suit.
     Key provisions of the disingenuously titled Patriot Act hatched from the rank exploitation of fears following the "9/11" disaster by the disgraced Bush-Cheney administration including the widely condemned Section 215 (including by both the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Rifle Association) are set to expire under "sunset" provisions unless they are again extended by 1 June 2015. Despite sham lawsuits by social media giants against the NSA these technology behemoths' complicity in NSA mass surveillance is well documented including without limitation all of the above-mentioned social media monsters as well as Yahoo! and several others. This was perhaps most recently confirmed by exiled American NSA contractor Edward J. Snowden from his first-hand knowledge in a recent Moscow interview with John Oliver host of "Last Week Tonight" shown on Home Box Office (HBO) and available, of course, on YouTube. Mr. Snowden incidentally in this year's Academy Award winning documentary "CitizenFour" names the NSA British partner in crime GCHQ as even more prone to privacy and other abuse if imaginable than the NSA.
     Readers interested in more information regarding the European class action lawsuit being brought in Vienna against Facebook European Dublin headquarters can go to the second link below.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/08/world/europe/google-turkey-kiraz-prosecutor.html?ref=todayspaper

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-32229285

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

06 April 2015

UPDATED: Snowden Honored By Monument Soon After Removed By Authorities In New York In Act Of "Censorship" New York Times Reports

     Monday, 6 September 2015, BROOKLYN, NY - A monument honoring the United States National Security Agency (NSA) blatantly unconstitutional mass domestic surveillance whistle-blower Edward J. Snowden with a sculptured bust of Mr. Snowden's head atop and "SNOWDEN" at its base erected in Brooklyn's Fort Greene Park by an anonymous group was "censored" by New York authorities who soon covered and then removed it. Interested readers can go to the below link for more information including a photograph of the Snowden monument with his bust atop. The New York Times later published a second version of the story Tuesday, 7 April 2015 which readers can find at the second link below showing authorities in the act of covering the bust. Mr. Snowden currently is exiled in Russia.

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/06/edward-snowden-is-honored-then-censored/?_r=0

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/06/edward-snowden-is-honored-then-censored/?ref=todayspaper&_r=0

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved


22 February 2015

BREAKING NEWS: "Citizenfour" Best Documentary Academy Award Winner Celebrating Courage Of Edward J. Snowden In Exposing The Disgraceful Unconstitutional Grossly Unlawful Universal Domestic Spying Of The Criminal National Security Agency (NSA) Continuing Criminal Surveillance To This Day

       Sunday, 22 February 2015, HOLLYWOOD, CA - The entire editorial board of the Ninth Amendment congratulates all who participated in the making of the documentary film "Citizenfour" which moments ago won the 2015 Best Documentary Film Academy Award. The makers of the film expressed their hope that the award will help spread the word of the courage and persistence of Edward J. Snowden and those who follow him in exposing the grossly unlawful unconstitutional criminal actions of the disgraceful universal domestic spying conspiracy known as the National Security Agency (NSA) and other "national security" agencies whose participating members need look no further than their mirrors to find the true traitors to the values enshrined in the United States Constitution.              
       None yet have been prosecuted for the crimes (in which President Obama sadly has become complicit) committed in their criminal conspiracy continuing at least from the time of the "Trailblazer Project" universal cellphone database for nearly fifteen years through several other illegal unconstitutional surveillance programs notably such as PRISM with data collection for the NSA performed by the FBI Data Intercept Technology Unit (DITU) and participation of technology companies including Microsoft in 2007, Yahoo! in 2008, Google in 2009, Facebook in 2009, Paltalk in 2009, YouTube in 2010, AOL in 2011, Skype in 2011 and Apple in 2012 (according to the Wikepedia article linked to below) with such illegal surveillance and data collection continuing to this day.
       "We kill people based on metadata." Former NSA Director General William C. Hayden.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_%28surveillance_program%29

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved