Showing posts with label complaint. Show all posts
Showing posts with label complaint. Show all posts

15 April 2015

UPDATED: EU Hits Google With Search "Abuse" Action And Expands EU Investigation Of Google Android Anti-Competitive Practices As EU Antitrust, Tax And Privacy Scrutiny Of Tech Giants Grows Amid Widespread Concerns

     Wednesday, 15 April 2015, BRUSSELS - European Union (EU) competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager a leading Danish politician who last year became the EU's antitrust chief today accused Google in a statement of objection making the formal complaint that Google's dominant search engine diverts traffic from its competitors to favor Google's own goods and services particularly shopping websites. Google has ten weeks to respond and rebuke the charges or alternatively try to settle the matter to avoid the potential levy of a fine of more than 6 billion Euros (about $6.5 billion) which is approximately 10 per cent of Google's last reported annual revenue. Ms. Vestager also said the investigation leading to the complaint may expand beyond shopping websites.
     EU competition commissioner Vestager further announced today that the Commission was expanding its investigation into Google's business practices concerning its Android software with which operating system Google holds an 81% worldwide market share for phones and other mobile devices amid concerns that Google requires mobile device makers using the Android operating system and desiring Google applications such as YouTube to bundle and/or place Google-branded applications in the most prominent positions on the devices. Google vigorously denied all charges.
     The EU announcements come amid continuing complaints of competitors and intensifying EU scrutiny of tax breaks, anti-competitive and privacy policy concerns about U.S. tech giants in a widespread growing climate of European and other countries' concerns about possible abuses of nations and their citizens by dominant American technology companies whose practices have gone largely unchecked or in some areas such as privacy invasions even may have been encouraged by the U.S. government in light of revelations of the complicity of some in the U.S. government continuing global mass surveillance and metadata collection practices such as by the National Security Agency as well as other U.S. government agencies.  
     Readers interested in more information about the above EU actions can go to one or more links below while those readers interested in actions underway or contemplated in other non-European nations as to U.S. giant tech company practices are referred particularly to the New York Times link below. [UPDATE]  The New York Times article since also has been significantly expanded in the second link below.


Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

01 April 2015

UPDATED: DEA And Secret Service Agents Charged With Money Laundering And Wire Fraud (DEA Agent Also With Theft Of Government Property And Conflict Of Interest) Allegedly Committed Investigating Notorious "Silk Road" Dark Web Black-Market Drug / Other Contraband Bitcoin Sales Site Founder

     Wednesday, 1 April 2015, NEW YORK, NY - The United States government Monday in San Francisco federal court criminally charged DEA Special Agent Carl Mark Force IV and Secret Service Agent Shaun W. Bridges with unlawfully enriching themselves while conducting an undercover investigation of the founder Ross W. Ulbricht allegedly aka "Dread Pirate Roberts" of the popular notorious virtually untraceable Silk Road dark web black-market website infamous for its equally virtually untraceable sales by a thousand drug dealers of hundreds of kilograms of illegal drugs to 100,000 buyers and other contraband also with equally virtually untraceable Bitcoin currency sales transactions often delivering such items by mail right to people's doors according to a former FBI agent interviewed on CNN's "Inside Man" who related that shortly after the site was shut down in 2013 it simply re-emerged shortly thereafter as Silk Road II. DEA Special Agent Force resigned in 2014 and Secret Service Agent Bridges in March 2015 both upon learning they were under investigation by the U.S. government for corruption.
     Following a Manhattan-based investigation site founder Mr. Ulbricht was charged and despite maintaining his innocence in ongoing operations of Silk Road except being pulled back in as a "fall guy" was convicted last month on "numerous" counts according to the New York Times article linked to below with upcoming sentencing at which he faces life in prison. While Mr. Ulbricht's attorney contends that the charges brought by the U.S. government against its own recently resigned agents undermine the government's case brought against Mr. Ulbricht the U.S. government contends that the criminally charged DEA and Secret Service Agents worked out of a Baltimore-based task force while the Manhattan-based investigation proceeded on an "separate and independent" track.
     Although Mr. Ulbricht's attorney complained that the U.S. government had not revealed the extent of its DEA and Secret Service Agents' alleged corruption during the investigation the Court ruled that evidence of it could be kept out of Mr. Ulbricht's trial on charges still pending from the allegedly "separate and independent" track of the Baltimore task force investigation as the Court ruled the charges related only to U.S. government agents' corruption.
     The criminal complaint unsealed in San Francisco federal court Monday alleged that U.S. DEA Agent Force in the course of the investigation "stole and converted to his personal use a sizable amount of Bitcoins," the currency used in the undercover investigation, totaling at least $778,000. "Rather than turning the Bitcoin over to the government, Force deposited them into his own personal accounts." DEA Agent Force also in addition to allegedly attempting to extort $250,000 from Dread Pirate Roberts upon telling him he was a U.S. government agent did in fact allegedly receive a $50,000 payment from Dread Pirate Roberts for providing him with allegedly "inside" law enforcement information. Meanwhile the federal government charged in its unsealed San Francisco complaint that its Secret Service Agent Bridges a computer forensics expert diverted more than $800,000 to his own personal account in the course of the undercover investigation.
       Readers interested in more information can refer to the link to the New York Times article below which itself contains details of and a link to more information of the concluded case against Mr. Ulbricht as well as a link to a copy of the U.S. government complaint unsealed Monday in San Francisco federal court against its former DEA Agent Force and Special Service Agent Bridges who maintain their innocence.
      [UPDATED] In the newly added second link below readers may find further details from the complaint unsealed in San Francisco including some of the scenes playing out behind the scenes regarding the undercover investigation including its impacts on the case brought in New York federal court against Mr. Ulbricht resulting in his conviction on several counts for which as mentioned above he may face life in prison.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/31/nyregion/silk-road-case-federal-agents-charges.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=second-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/02/nyregion/agent-was-secretly-investigated-during-silk-road-trial.html?&moduleDetail=section-news-1&action=click&contentCollection=Technology&region=Footer&module=MoreInSection&pgtype=article

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

26 March 2015

World's Leading Thinkers British Prospect Magazine Poll Results With One Or Two Small Complaints From The New York Times And The Ninth Amendment

       Thursday, 26 March 2015, NEW YORK, NY - The British magazine Prospect poll results of the world's leading thinkers (with photographs) presented via link by the New York Times Economics Nobel Prize Winner Princeton Professor Paul Krugman with one small complaint. Interested readers who go to the link below should be able to figure out the reason for Professor Krugman's complaint which itself links to the poll. Readers uninterested in Professor Krugman's complaint can go directly to the poll results via the second link below. But where is Noam Chomsky? Furthermore it would appear at this time that none of the Ninth Amendment's editorial board nor global staff made the list although the poll results may not yet be absolutely final or subject to revision or . . . if only the Ninth Amendment could still send in all of our votes from Tanguska which can take a long time to get to Great Britain.

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved