Thursday, 7 February 2013, SAN FRANCISCO - Ed Lee current San Francisco mayor lied under oath during an Ethics Committee hearing last summer as all evidence tangible and circumstantial strongly supports. Feedback of reader response to our release of news regarding exposure of San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee's unambiguous perjury now received and preliminarily analyzed by the Ninth Amendment editorial and technical staffs indicates either that we failed to live up to our responsibility to our readers by not sufficiently conveying the import of this buried news of the San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee's criminal act committed without so far any apparent consequence after the passage of nearly nine months since his lies made under oath with apparent obvious attempt to abort and/or cover them up..
Alternatively our readers worldwide have limited interest in the latest admittedly perpetually juvenile "political" developments in this otherwise world-class city better watched for its sports than it's circus-like politics only rarely gone dangerously amok. Not since the late 1970's. No Jonestown massacres of underclass San Franciscans spirited off to the jungles of Guyana. Nor mayors nor supervisors murdered on the job replete with the usual hallmark oddities be they Twinkies or Kool-Aid. However our readers should note that the San Francisco they have known has become a much different place in terms of the focus and reconfiguration of the United States "intelligence" community to immerse and intertwine itself in the vast wealth of information flowing into and through this City. To wit, San Francisco is no joke.
San Francisco it should be noted, apart from its historically strategic geographical situation, has found itself in the apparent vortex of the various forces taking place as we move into the twenty-first century with San Francisco and its immediate environs become home to the tremendous forces that developed and matured from the once-nascent computer technology industry largely come to be located here.
Now constant developments in San Francisco strengthening the strategic forces of the constant advances of virtually limitless information collection regarding the activities of all not only all Americans but nearly all the population of the world have had the inevitable result of establishing San Francisco as a top "national security" justified bastion of United States "intelligence" agencies probably numbering now nearly a score of those that are just the best known and recognized. This is a grave threat to the Constitutional rights of all Americans as well as the fundamental human rights of all living persons in every corner of the planet.
No place is safe technologically nor legally (especially since the Bush passage and the Obama endorsement of the so-called "Patriot Act") despite the completely misleading misimpression fostered in most consumers (i.e. nearly the entire population other than the world's largest percentage currently incarcerated and in many cases awaiting death administered by the State penal industries) of "friendly" reassuring banal statements and disingenuous conduct by giants such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, and all the rest of the "social media" and related giants with just oh so friendly, clever and downright goofy names. Kind of like the New York Times renaming itself the KazooYou, (Oh, GoDaddy, that one is taken already?)
Make no potentially ultimately fatal mistake about the future of our Country as We The People established it by compact under the United States Constitution, because as emphasized here when push comes to shove more of us have come to strongly suspect that with each day passing CIA EQUALS GOOGLE, pick your favorite national security agency and its intelligence resources too ALSO EQUAL Google, Zuckerboy's Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, and hundreds of other lesser-known supposed "fun innocently commercial" endeavors. Not to mention the wealth of your most personal information which is ALL available to the right people if you have communicated it on the internet, or in some cases, just exposed it to your used or unused telephone with camera, not to mention the camera atop your computer, or we can only guess how many other ways. Did you think the New York Times technology editor keeps the lens of the camera atop his computer covered with heavy black electrical tape when not in use?
And where is the exponentially growing nexus of these intelligence-gathering capabilities and activities, be it by the CIA, FBI, or one of the score of other United States Executive Branch and military "national intelligence" agencies, or of Google, Facebook, Twitter, or Yahoo, one of your "recreational" completely "voluntary" by deception or otherwise outlets on sites and in e-mails of your most private beliefs, thoughts, actions, contacts, preferred geographical locations, facial features, and so much more? The nexus dear readers is we believe most would agree and need recognize the City and County of San Francisco.
There the Ninth Amendment editors rest their case (for the moment) as to why you may very well wish to know the details of last summer's phony bomb scare telephoned in to a private police line precisely at the moment that San Francisco Smiln' Lyin" Mayor Ed Lee was right at the moment in the process of commencing to perjure himself on the stand. And of all things, regarding his juvenile dispute with Sheriff Mikarimi. It was enough to show the big boys that Ed Lee is no genius, but perhaps whether an asset or not yet to be seen.
In any case the Ninth Amendment urges readers to do at least a little simple research from that "Search" box on readers' monitors. You too may find yourself wondering why when the proceedings were then interrupted and police officers emptied the hearing room, it was but the solitary Mayor Ed Lee forgotten left sitting on the stand. Left by himself back there inside City Hall maybe sitting right on the bomb, forgotten, eventually only after about twenty minutes deciding to wander back to his City Hall office.
Nothing to do but wait until it was "all clear" and all the others could be let back in the building and realize that, oops!", they had left the mayor behind. Now needed to hear the rest of his no-doubt reconsidered testimony, perhaps he wished almost in time to say "perjury-aborted". But Lee already had lied under oath. So who really runs San Francisco now -- the Ninth Amendment editorial board is confident that even Mayor Ed Lee now recognizes that it is not he. So who owns him? And does he stay or go?
Copyright 2013 Big M All World Rights Expressly Reserved
