Showing posts with label cyberattack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cyberattack. Show all posts

02 December 2016

Declassify Secret Russia Role In U.S. Election Intelligence President Obama Urged To Disclose By Seven Intelligence Committee Senators In Open Letter

     Friday, 2 December 2016, WASHINGTON, D.C. - Seven Democratic senators on the Senate Intelligence Committee in an "unprecedented"  three sentence open letter to President Barack Obama obtained, shown and read verbatim yesterday to viewers by MSNBC's Rachel Maddow urged the President to declassify further intelligence concerning Russian interference with the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election so that the information can be disclosed to the American people. The senators apparently were familiar with the classified information but disclosed nothing in their short open letter which concluded by stating they would follow-up with specifics to President Obama through "classified channels" and thanking him for giving his attention to this important matter. The Republican senators on the committee declined to sign the letter.
     To date there have been rare direct public statements by two U.S. intelligence agencies before the election those being the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security specifically placing blame for cyberattack hacking interference attempts directed at the U.S. election as being perpetrated by the Russian state including particularly by targeting both the Democratic National Committee and the campaign of Hillary Clinton then feeding stolen and possibly altered emails through Wikileaks for internet release specifically to damage Ms. Clinton's campaign to the benefit of now President-elect Trump's campaign.
     Following the election Admiral Michael Rogers director of the National Security Agency delivered an emphatic public statement again emphasizing that to a certainty Russia was the state party responsible for attempts and/or interference with the U.S. election. Admiral Rogers gave the strong impression that he meant to warn the public that it should take the Russian threat seriously which has not necessarily been the case to date doubtless not helped as Mr. Trump largely has conveyed a lack of confidence or concern or even interest in the intelligence he has been provided on matters of national security in his position as President-elect.
     Also as previously reported here in an earlier post a "top official" with the "administration" provided on condition of anonymity for undisclosed reasons a brief written statement devoid of any detail but "defending the integrity" of the election. The warnings of intelligence officials now augmented by the senators' letter to President Obama strongly suggest that the White House is downplaying some matter of significant concern including by withholding information necessary for the American people to grasp its gravity. Nor has further information been forthcoming as to the unusual somewhat cryptic uncharacteristic quiet threat with a slight smile by Vice-President Biden during an interview before the election that the United States was going to (presumably) retaliate for cyberattack interference with the presidential election or possibly anything else assessed as an attack against U.S. interests essentially "in an appropriate manner in a time and a place of our choosing."
     Former U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul briefly interviewed in the video link below when informed of the senators' open letter to the President said that such an action was to his knowledge "unprecedented". Although not being privy to the classified information at issue as he has been out of the government for a couple years and now is a professor at Stanford University he stated that just given the fact that these senators had felt it necessary to take such an unprecedented action as the open letter urging the President's disclosure of some classified intelligence was "deeply disturbing" and indicative of something quite consequential of which the American people have not been apprised. Senator Wyden of Oregon who apparently was the lead senator on the letter would provide no information whatsoever about the letter nor to what it referred. Readers interested in more information can go to the first link below which shows an MSNBC video about this matter of about ten minutes length.
     Readers can go to the second link below if interested in more broader background on Russian covert influence efforts that a "senior intelligence official" yesterday told Reuters have been increasing in Europe in recent years as part of a larger campaign against the United States and other Western nations seeking to disrupt and discredit democratic institutions, nations and alliances such as NATO as well as noting the coordinated efforts of these nations to monitor and respond to these threats, including as described by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper in a September 2016 letter to Congress just made available to Reuters on 2 December 2016 asking that Congress not attempt itself to probe Russian covert influence attempts as there already are ongoing coordinated efforts with other nations with these efforts underway best left to U.S. and partner intelligence agencies to avoid duplication of effort and not risk disruption of already developed coordination between these nations' intelligence agencies.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/senators-seek-to-declassify-info-on-russia-role-in-us-election-822587459996

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-intelligence-russia-idUSKBN13R2GB?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtopNews+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Top+News%29

Copyright 2016 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

19 April 2015

Internet "Militarization" Threat As White House And GOP Congress Conspire On "Cyberdefense" Corporate Immunity Bill For Personal Privacy Invasions

     Sunday, 19 April 2015, WASHINGTON, D.C. - Exploiting the latest government-contrived hysteria over dire cybersecurity threats including a well-timed "chilling" Government Accountability Office (GAO) report concluding that hackers "potentially" could take control of airliners exploiting onboard Wi-Fi passenger networks (not to mention some kid just taking aircraft down with a consumer drone bought at a local market) further raising the alarm of those "confessing" the "rising threat of cyberjihadists" two Texans (freshmen from the endemically corrupt Lone Star state Republican party John Heath and formerly with the C.I.A. Will Hurd) have "written and engineered" a so-called "cyberdefense" bill (doubtless "engineered" as capably as the Patriot Act) granting businesses "broad immunity" for sharing "cyberthreat indicator" information with each other and the government's "obscure" National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center and for launching counterattacks (potentially against consumers' computers and phones) on the basis of "suspected" attacks which bill last week was rushed in a day through the House Homeland Security Committee by another Texan Republican chairman and "chief architect" of the bill (which apparently also required architecture as well as engineering and writing) Michael McCaul "working with the White House" who before calling for a vote informed committee members that "American companies are under siege" and also mentioned that hackers had this month acquired "nonclassified" but "sensitive" White House information including the President's unpublished schedule (President Obama's "published" schedule for the day is available to anyone signing up for daily White House emails).
     The House of Representatives is expected to pass the corporate immunity from "reasonable" privacy invasions and computer counterattack damages bill (the Ninth Amendment editorial board's proposed alternative name for the bill) as early as this week although the House and Senate still must resolve differences over privacy protections (or the lack thereof) and overcome concerns of civil liberties advocates such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) who "worry" about spying on innocent people and others about Internet "militarization" because of private companies being authorized or effectively deputized to "launch countermeasures" against those suspected of "attacking" them. Businesses long until now have been particularly concerned about liability for accidentally releasing personal customer information "compounded by leaks from National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden" which also reportedly causes industries to "fear disclosing vulnerability" presumably about themselves as well although it is unclear how. In any case reportedly "[i]n the end, fear may outweigh concerns about civil liberties".
     Readers interested in more information about the above can go to the San Antonio Express-News article link below also describing in some detail the huge cybersecurity apparatus in that city (which former C.I.A. Republican freshman Hurd represents) said to employ 2,000 through 3,000 in private companies and 7,000 through 10,000 in government cybersecurity installations including the Air Force Cyber Command and "one of the largest" National Security Agency (NSA) centers outside of the NSA's Fort Meade, Maryland headquarters. (Readers not presently subscribed to that newspaper can get a free two week all digital subscription which would seem to be necessary to read the article in its entirety although the Ninth Amendment by no means intends this as a promotion nor endorsement of that newspaper.)

http://www.expressnews.com/news/local/article/Cybersecurity-bill-could-let-companies-trade-info-6208429.php

 Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved  

13 October 2014

I. Google Retaliates For Google+ Deceptive Practices Disclosure? EXCLUSIVE: Google Bloggers Damaged By Massive Failures In Statistical Performance Reporting Reinforcing Fears Either Of Google Complicity Or Being A Further Major U.S. Target Of Hacker Attacks With Breakdown Of Server Control Possibly By Malevolent Inside Or Third Parties In Diverse IT Operation Areas In Retaliation For Google Complicity In Illegal Federal Government Including Partner CIA Dragnet Unconstitutional Spying Or Alternatively Orchestrated By Federal Government "Domestic Spying" Surveillance (NSA) And Response Agencies Retailiating For Recent Google And Other Tech Firms' Public Federal Court Wins Against Federal Spy Agencies In Actions Being Appealed At President Obama's Direction Prosecuted By Resigning Attorney General Eric Holder And DOJ Clandestine Operations Divisions

       Monday, 13 October 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA - The editorial board of the Ninth Amendment has initiated a continuing investigation by its domestic and global bureaus of the above as yet unconfirmed various speculations in light of CIA partner Google's and other tech companies such as Microsoft Inc., longtime CIA facilitator Facebook, and Twitter recent public stances and formal legal proceedings against forced participation in "NSA Snooping" organizing opposition to Federal Government domestic spying activities on a dragnet scale including by the FBI, NSA, and as many as scores of other newly styled federal "dark ops" being perpetrated domestically as well as on foreign soil including against American citizens without probable cause nor any seeming adherence to long-established Constitutionally mandated standards of conduct in direct contravention of prevailing legal interpretations of Americans' core fundamental Constitutional and admittedly violated as claimed to be non-applicable statutory and other rights without due process of law nor any required public notice including neither to the public nor to Congressional oversight committees under cover of various undeclared "wars" against non-states including those against "drugs, terrorism, with new unrestrained command and control opportunities presented by ISIS and more recently Ebola both of which were brought to the American public's larger attention at about the same time, cyberattacks in fact for example found to have been launched by U.S. Government executive branch "black ops" agencies including against foreign sovereign nations and internal entities tied to them and extending to those largely unaccountable operatives now responsible for intelligence gathering and rapid response activities including lethal surveillance teams acting on behalf of the Federal Government executive branch's newly enhanced worldwide interrogation and assassination apparatus with de facto murders including those documented of such targets as current United States citizens for example by a new global scale proliferation of communications and visual spy satellites as well as unmanned surveillance and termination aerial combat drones with foreign and domestic unreported but widely rumored significant collateral damage under direct final exclusive execution orders of U.S. President Barack Obama and speculated to be at least in part responsible for Attorney General Eric Holder's sudden unexpected meeting with the President to tender his resignation at the earliest time practicable as United States Attorney General the Nation's highest law enforcement official responsible for day-to-day operational control of the Department of Justice under White House direction in both its public and more recently expanded clandestine and damage control capacities often currently rendering legal opinions ordered in after-the-fact attempts to justify actions and perform damage control including by unprecedented use of "national security" related unexplained secrecy claims even in apparently purely domestic proceedings rather than traditional dispensing of legal advice informing the future conduct of the growing mass of federal spying, intelligence, and security implementation agencies increasingly having grown seemingly uncontrollably unresponsive to long-established Constitutional, statutory and chain-of-command restraints on their conduct feared by many publicly and privately to have run amok capitalizing on various campaigns exploiting terror fears and "wars" none of which have been Constitutionally declared since the Second World War under President and Commander-In-Chief and once reported President Obama idol former United States President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
       Meanwhile Google continues to retaliate against the Ninth Amendment by interfering with recent posts reader access and/or accurate statistical reporting for the Ninth Amendment's exposure of just one component of Google's deceptive practices in trying to coerce Google Blogger and other service users to switch to Google+ solely for Google's financial benefit in attempting to create a contrived very lucrative social media franchise by deceiving current users to disclose personal information and artificially create friendships and relationships between persons which are none existent one example of which is discussed for interested readers in the link immediately below:

http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/column/jay-gabler/google-plus-deceptive-friend-invite

Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

08 October 2014

UPDATE: New Information On Computer Breach Of JPMorgan Chase And Nine Other Financial Institutions From Saturday, 4 October 2014 Post Below Now Reported Of Ongoing Great Concern To President Obama And White House With Routine Briefings

       Wednesday, 8 October 2014, NEW YORK, NEW YORK - This post briefly updates the below Ninth Amendment post dated Saturday, 4 October with more detailed information provided as to the above and related computer breaches and emphasizing the great concern of President Obama, the White House and Wall Street meriting the President's routine attention equivalent to that of national security matters including also some historical context of large-scale computer hacking of major financial and retail institutions as well as very serious difficulties in tracing their sources which have included past traces to current fugitives identified as long ago as 2011 and now believed to be in the Ukraine although not necessarily related to the months-long current cyberattacks which have continued for months without a determination of their purpose whether it be related to Putin's retaliation for economic sanctions, more straightforward common theft, or some other motivation nor determination of perpetrators as well as further tips for readers in addition to those included in the above-referenced post and link. For interested readers the link to the New York Times article digitally published within the past hour here now replaced with the 9:57 pm update detailing new information on the recent major breaches, more historical background, enforcement efforts and the extreme difficulty of bringing culprits to justice or the existence of adequate legislation for prosecution of them as well as tips for consumers to take protective measures appears directly below.

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/10/08/cyberattack-on-jpmorgan-raises-alarms-at-white-house-and-on-wall-street/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_php=true&_type=blogs&hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=HpSumSmallMediaHigh&module=second-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=1&

Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

02 April 2013

"Massive Cyberattack" Hits Internet Disrupts Worldwide Web Service Allgedly Launched By Cyberbunker, Others Against Non-Profit Spamhaus

     Tuesday, 2 April 2013, AMSTERDAM - The Ninth Amendment's Amsterdam bureau reports corroborating information regarding what other sources including CNN have called a "massive cyberattack" allegedly launched by Dutch company Cyberbunker and other alleged conspirators last Friday, 29 March 2013 against non-profit Spamhaus Group which provides free data used by companies including many e-mail service providers to block up to 80% of the world's "spam" dissemination on the internet. Cyberbunker based in a former military bunker in Holland reportedly boasts that it provides servers for worldwide dissemination of any type of material except "child porn" or that aiding or abetting "terrorists".
     The alleged Cyberbunker attack was reported to be a "denial of service" attack against Spamhaus which consists of directing overwhelming amounts of internet traffic to its servers so as to shut them down. Spamhaus in an effort to avoid being literally knocked off the internet employed a technique of redirecting the huge volume of traffic onto the internet, apparently in such great amounts that it subsequently impacted and significantly disrupted much of the internet's worldwide traffic. Although the alleged three-day Cyberbunker attack reportedly ended it has now been picked up by other hackers and/or presumably corporate enemies of non-profit Spamhaus.
     Although this attack apparently has reached unparalleled proportions the perceived feud (at least by Cyberbunker) between Cyberbunker and Spamhaus reportedly has continued for some time. Although the Ninth Amendment at this time lacks information from law enforcement sources the private internet security firm engaged by Spamhaus has cast the alleged Cyberbunker attack as a debilitating denial of free speech on the internet whereas Spamhaus provision of data on entities such of spammers is entirely at the discretion of companies such as e-mail providers which voluntarily choose to use it to protect their computer and time resources as well as those of their users and customers.
     This CNN report which readers may access directly from the link below was brought to the attention of many by Avast! Corporation along with the provision of a free routine upgrade. Avast! currently is the leading provider of free and subscription virus protection programs. Readers are advised that reviews of much free and subscription software such as Avast! are available at www.cnet.com along with free downloads. Many computer experts this year have withdrawn their top recommendation for Microsoft Security Essentials which readers can research on their own with simple internet searches.
     Furthermore many computer experts such as the Ninth Amendment's own expert consultant BigBigJoe recommend that for most computer users choosing a single security software whether free or paid is one's most advisable course of action to, among other things, avoid conflicts between the different software which actually may identify elements of one another as various kinds of computer security threats and secondly because BigBigJoe recommends not overburdening one's computer with, excuse our English, too much "crap" that slows down or even causes one's computer eventually frequently to crash, resulting in one of most computer companies' favorite misconceptions.
     That being that it is time to pull out one's wallet and "upgrade". Translation: Dump out more money for more processing/memory power to accommodate more unwanted garbage that often is merely dumped onto readers' computers with a variety of "clever", or perhaps borderline fraudulent, techniques. Alternatively to run poorly and sloppily written software which eats up unimaginable amounts of computer resources such as the programming for which Microsoft has earned its infamy amongst many of those apparently in the know.
     Such as for example programmers for Microsoft and Apple who actually often do not use their own companies' software to write their "product" but instead rely on freeware such as Linux. Finally one way to avoid downloading unwanted software, toolbars, homepages, etc.is to refrain from running "express" downloads but instead choose the other option for "experts", i.e. those with the patience to review what actually is being downloaded along with their "free" software. After all, when it comes to for-profit America is anything really "free"? As we understand it, although we are not offering legal advice which can only be provided by a duly licensed attorney, in our lay understanding these corporations do have an obligation to maximize profits for shareholders within the limits of the law. Oh, yeah.
     The Ninth Amendment receives no remuneration of any type for the content of this post from any entity whatsoever. The link to the CNN report regarding "Massive Cyberattack" appears directly below..

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/03/27/tech/massive-internet-attack/index.html

Copyright 2013 Big M All World Rights Expressly Reserved