FBI Cries Foul To Latest Generation Apple iPhones Password Protection Even Apple Cannot Bypass To Access Data At Feds' Demand And Google Follows Suit Makes Claim For New Android Phones In Wake Of Yahoo Privacy Lawsuit Against Government

       Sunday, 28 September 2014, WASHINGTON, D.C. - In the wake of staggering revelations made public in documents still being released from Edward Snowden methodically upon determination that they will not put Government operatives or agents at direct risk steadily chronicling United States Government blatantly unconscionable unconstitutional criminal misconduct among other things in wholesale mass eavesdropping on and permanently recording its own American citizens across the board with no cause at all snooping into every aspect of the lives of all American people respecting no privacy whatsoever even in every sacred moment of their lives including their communicating about perfectly legal business, family and pleasure matters to everything in between without limitation including for example all from the most deeply personal to commercial secrets to private religious, medical, and political conversations as well as with their lawyers and accountants, political to intimate conversations between couples married and not and the millions of other types of perfectly legal totally private and personal conversations in which everyone in the United States should be able to engage with the expectation of the right to privacy being absolutely recognized and respected by the State whose morally bankrupt criminal snoops otherwise belong in prison.
       That expectation is inherent given the understanding of for what Americans have fought and died to live in a country with a government constrained and respectful of laws rather than one that routinely criminally misbehaves as a matter of course lording over its citizens as if they were the oppressed slaves of a totalitarian state now to the point that finally even America's tech giants are fighting back perhaps soon in court and right now in their research and development efforts after routinely being forced under illegal orders to execute the Government's criminal dirty work against Apple and Google's own clients and customers and then left largely to play the fall guys for these heinous illegal Government-ordered invasions of privacy on a scale so universal as to have come to seem unreal as directed by Government representatives now too young to have fought in anything but phony wars as exemplified by the phony Nixon totally hypocritical insincere losing "war on drugs" dragging on now for 40+ years with no overall progress at all to show for it but rather the establishment of highly violent international crime organizations that are at the point of rivaling the firepower of entire corrupted nations leaving behind a trail countless dead including tens of thousands of innocents and nothing to show but failure failure and misery.
       Though Facelog's Zuckerboy with his ever-evolving schemes to extract from Facebook users as much private information by any means possible with no notice whatsoever until forced to provide it has long been suspected by many of being a CIA operative with a devious brilliance this sick penchant for extracting more information through ever-expanding trickery in his Mugbook service that will "always be free" including using devices such as facial recognition technology and "tagging" and on and on as he relentlessly persists in trying to dupe Americans and persons worldwide into creating their own most intimate files to serve as ready fodder "selfie"-made dossiers for government perusal at its leisure essentially a J. Edgar Hoover sicko romp into Zuckerboy's twisted idea of privacy invasion mugshot heaven with all biographical information including birth, location, family, friends, activities, politics, thoughts, etc. to boot. The European community having a little more context long has not been amused with his twisted antics with its European Union regulators fining his spydom goldmine hundreds of millions of dollars on more than one occasion yet barely even followed in the news it means so little to the bottom line especially as it is probably paid by American taxpayers via the CIA anyway.
       Back in the United States while Zuckerboy no doubt gladly hands it all over to his handlers the other tech giants have become increasingly uneasy with first Yahoo which unsuccessfully sued the U.S. Government for ordering it to turn over clients' private information but did prevail in being able to make the damning case files public.  Unlike Zuckerboy proud to violate the Constitution at every opportunity at the Government's behest provided Zuckerboy even knows or cares what the Constitution is (or rather was), Apple too like Yahoo apparently has had it with playing criminal in the eyes of the American and foreign peoples under orders from the metastasized National Security agencies thus commercially threatening the company at home and especially abroad and yesterday announced the release of the latest generation iPhone which even Apple cannot penetrate once it is in the customer's hands. No backdoor for the suits to sneak into Americans treasure trove of private information which the U.S. Government has come to see as its birthright.
       Now Google long suspected itself of managing Americans private information in collusion with the CIA allegedly with some data centers built side-by-side has turned and also taken aim first organizing resistance to NSA blanket interception and storage of communications and now like Apple in the technology research and development arena announced it also no longer had provided a "backdoor" for the government "suits" to slip inside to snoop around Google's clients' most private information either. So Google although long suspected itself of complicity in the Government's mass surveillance run totally amok of the Constitution (although a big deal was made most likely as a cover story about the resourceful Feds having to crack the code and secretly intercept an uncooperative Google's internal date packet transmissions "on the fly" under yet another novel lame legal theory of legitimacy concocted by U.S. Government "lawyers" no doubt on the condition that whatever latest tortured analysis they had concocted justifying the Government's crimes in advance be locked deep in a vault and never looked at again until fifty years after all involved were dead now also apparently really is fed up as Google now spearheads NSA reform drives and apparently shares Apple's domestic and especially foreign commercial concerns about further even involuntary participation with the government spying on its customers and/or clients and thus made Google's own announcement on the heels of Apple's that its latest generation Android phones likewise could not be penetrated for data even by Google.
      The Feds with their newfound 21st Centuty attitude of total entitlement and apparent perceived immunity from incarceration (for themselves) are apoplectic having sucked at the tit of unconstitutionality for so long and with such impunity that the existing phone warrant requirement (still the law of the land for wired phones last the Ninth Amendment heard) seems to them a quaint relic of the dinosaur age (the 1950's) since the advent of the portable and then cellphone of course meant to them that although the legal reasoning should have been exactly the same and likewise protected such communications the Feds had soon made it clear that if it went through the air rather than a line a telephone conversation involved no expectation of privacy at all. A perfectly tautological argument making no sense whatsoever.
       And that reasoning certainly did become a self-fulfilling prophecy because law enforcement with impunity since routinely has listened in on any such telephone so there sure was no expectation of privacy since law enforcement made sure privacy in such conversations was non-existent. As the Virginia farmboys' parents and ancestors who had themselves once made honest livings and fought to the death for such liberties would say it was a case in which "the horse followed the cart". And the American people allowed this further assault to be perpetrated against their rapidly disappearing core fundamental rights under the Constitution with barely a whimper all for the sake of the instant convenience of pulling a phone from one's pocket and also because they most likely knew no better even if the government would be the third party on the line.
       Readers interested in more detail concerning this latest seemingly ever more rare "last stand" to uphold a constitutional right to privacy here by sure force of technology may refer to the CNN print story below now with a little more context perhaps as to why the FBI grown fat and lazy (at least metaphorically if not in the movies) certainly cannot abide being deprived of the convenience of merely being able to order some tech giant to suck the information out of readers' phones although the FBI apparently still grudgingly recognizes the requirement of some sham of a warrant for data surprisingly acknowledging that any part of the Constitution that protects the American people's rights still even may exist (or so it claims, but the FBI could be lying too).
       However the mere thought of Apple or Google marketing its most recent phones in the face of the FBI's brilliant (for the FBI) argument that like a closet that can NEVER be opened, now by that thought the FBI cannot just abide. The Constitution is said go be a "living document" and sometimes living things just need to die for a while before they can come back. . . . as for example . . . a totalitarian state. The infrastructure of a rigorous democracy ostensibly is still here seemingly visible for all to see although its actual out of sight functionality merely has merely changed a bit. Indeed just as Aldous Huxley predicted.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/25/politics/fbi-apple-google-privacy/index.html?section=money_topstories&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fmoney_topstories+%28Top+Stories%29

Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

Illegal NSA "Top Secret" Google Encrypted Cloud Data Transmission Interception Revealed, Google And Partner CIA Weigh Cuba Or North Korea Relocation

       Monday, 5 November 2013, HAVANA - The New York Times weekly "Bits and Blogs" section today examines how the United States Government continues to destroy the credibility of some of this Country's most successful modern era high-tech businesses including Yahoo, Google and others. The included Washington Post article below linked continues that newspaper's investigation of illegal NSA interception of Americans' individual personal private and corporate proprietary information apparently under the mistaken delusion that conspiring to commit criminal acts by hiring others to do it for one is itself legal.
       General Alexander's NSA desperate to determine who readers' Google "Circle of  Friends" are and why the NSA has so few is rumored to have followed the lead of other "National Security" agencies believed exclusively to hire first-year law students to issue legal opinions out of their Agana, Guam garage "HQ Legal Cubicle Suite" producing "opinions on demand" such as that any U.S. agency which includes "National Security" can flaunt laws in the United States and in Europe and elsewhere commit even more clearly illegal acts by enlisting assistance from its overseas "partners in crime" including the most recently disclosed GCHQ.
      NSA which is not on speaking terms with its drone-armed archrival CIA presumably is unaware that it has been widely known for a decade that the CIA is both a major Google investor through a Wall Street "front company" as well as business partner through a publicly acknowledged well-publicized joint venture with Google.
        Google and CIA servers in fact frequently are housed  in neighboring buildings although Google usually has nice ones while the CIA's usually are hidden in faux "office parks". This can be confirmed by looking through their garbage on "trash day". The DEA has helped to establish laws that once placed out on the curb trash is "public property" as to which there is "no expectation of privacy". Neither the NSA nor the CIA are known to be conscientious recyclers even where required by law due to a legal concept known as pre-emption.
       Meanwhile Google's President Eric Schmidt last week praised the "connectivity" of Cuba and North Korea presumably hinting that a major relocation of Google and other top American high-tech businesses may be under consideration to such countries with less intrusive governments which have better things to do than read people's mail constantly harassing the businesses to spend their time and money assembling massive illegal government information requests regarding topics such as who got what for their birthday.

Washington Post  article link:

 http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/11/04/how-we-know-the-nsa-had-access-to-internal-google-and-yahoo-cloud-data/

Copyright 2013 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved. No claim as to Washington Post material.

Comment On Ninth Amendment Posts Does Not Include Breaking Into E-Mail, Telephone And/Or Other Accounts, Drafting Fake Messages "From" Others Against Interest, Hacking In Unauthorized Phones Such As (415) 602-7250 To Issue Account Administrator Authroizations, Entering Account "Side Doors" With Illegally Obtained Information Using Compromised Accounts Such As Google, And Most Significantly Implying That The Actions, Friends And Habits Of Young Children Of Or Known By The Victim(s) Are Being Observed As Implicit Threats Of Harm ("Short Eyes")

     Lundi, 15 July 2013, HILL COUNTRY, TEXAS - Hello readers, investigators, interested parties, parties of interest, and others seeking truth, justice and liberty for all. That is but for such person(s) and/or institution(s) who and/or which may not presently enjoy life, liberty, property and happiness if deprived of it and/or them only as provided in the United States Constitution through their own action(s) as determined by their peers through proper machinations ensuring due process of law in reaching any determination or judgment.
     Notwithstanding the above the Ninth Amendment editorial board here in these hours following commemoration of Parisians 14 July storming of the Bastille commencing the French Revolution reminds or informs readers as the case may be that Ninth Amendment log posts at this URL address www.waronnothing.blogspot.com constitute core political free speech styled specifically to honor, in furtherance of  the New American tradition-in-the-making of "Gonzo" journalism as it originally was conceived, evolved and ultimately with mastery executed, the works and writing of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson.
     In all seriousness in the preceding days the following  has been communicated through all channels presently deemed appropriate, proper and necessary for the safety and well-being of all concerned parties. The lawful and accepted way to present commentary on the content of the Ninth Amendment log is to submit comments which incidentally to date since its inception have been published as submitted without change, the only admonition that the comment forum is not the place to communicate as "comments" what actually have been deemed to be submitted solely for the furtherance of commercial purposes unrelated to any posts here.
       Furthermore in all seriousness Comment is NOT the improper and unlawful violation of legally protected and enforceable rights of the Ninth Amendment log itself collectively, and/or as directed against individuals comprising its voice or the expression it embodies of fully free and protected speech, and/or by means individually or by a conspiracy of individuals attempting and/or acting as intentionally thinly veiled intimidation, inchoate threats or implications of surveillance and or personal knowledge of persons, or what may purport to be their personal and protected information for the apparent purpose of causing harm to individual(s) with intent, as well as with intent to stifle rights of expression and assembly including those protected by the First Amendment. Involvement with such conduct moreover even on the part of others may cast a wide net of culpability through the principles of attempt,conspiracy, knowledge before and after the fact,  obstruction of Justice, and so on in connection with the types of most serious crimes set out as but some possible examples apparent even as here to laypersons and set out in the following by this writer:
      
    "In or about the last several days one or more perpetrators apparently wished to make obvious to me their security breaches in my (formerly believed by me to be) sole administration and control of various (so far identified in and related to) internet and telephone accounts. The content of these breaches both comprised elements, as well as suggesting a possible conspiracy and/or attempt (so far as is known), to threaten me or the children of people I care about with being the victim of further potentially serious but unnamed crimes for which I believe other persons taking the actions necessary to do so risk bearing heavy criminal penalties when identified. These suspected breaches preliminarily were investigated and confirmed privately by former and present federal government trained computer security and cryptography experts of my acquaintance, at which time they were communicated by me to newspaper(s), service provider(s), and persons who work with, inter alia, the Department of Justice, also communicated and recorded by them including specific uncovered confirming evidence of the breach points, as well as the offending content, and told by me to many other confidantes as well. If any friend questions why I write and publicly expose the information developed here by me with help it is because I believe it my duty to all in my world to do so when these intruders might as well (except most is supposedly written in my words) claim to know my movements and those of the specifically named children of person(s) close to me, with the observation that today's world should not be assumed to be too safe a place. Furthermore I would hope to dissuade anyone even to consider doing anything else of nearly such a serious nature. Finally as some of the content in the draft emails purportedly from me led inexplicably directly into the lines of computer code appearing on the computer screen before a post goes final to digital publication in the Ninth Amendment log at www.waronnothing.blogspot.com (in case the possible/probable connection of the above-described to the publication of that internet publication escaped me), rather than succumb in silence as would appear to have been the intention of the attempted intimidation, it is my sincere hope that this course of action has been the most prudent one in both responsibly warning others who might be at risk, as well as dissuade whoever is behind it from taking anything any further. I am immensely grateful for the intensive late-night and overnight work of the two computer experts I mentioned, the latter especially who confirmed through the astounding depth of information he was able to uncover at incredible speed, including the connection to at least one specific identified telephone number accessing one of the accounts, and all the information available with that, including that phone's then-current approximate nearby geographical location. Furthermore he was able to uncover immediately thereafter that other communications to the account were being masked as from California but actually emanated from this Country's Central Time Zone, as another route to controlling the account had been hacked through a side door from a connection which I had not established the Google account in which the Ninth Amendment was published. Thanks too to all the others who took messages, preserved information, and most recently the Yahoo representative who spent more than three hours with me on the phone examining one of the e-mail accounts. As I told her I am terribly sorry her supervisor was on the phone for an extended period at the end on another matter, and I did not have the opportunity to thank her with all my heart, unlike representatives earlier in the day who would give me no more than thirty seconds and wanted to know nothing more than if I had changed my password. In any case, the urgency had seemed especially great as a frequent satirical target of the Ninth Amendment was Governor Rick Perry of Texas, and shortly after the undrafted by me drafts in my drafts account were literally thrust to my attention on my computer screen when they seemingly inserted themselves somehow above the inbox text underneath, I learned that Governor Perry had announced effectively the end of his historically long political career as Texas' in that he would not run again for Governor of Texas. Thank you for your attention to this and my best wishes to all friends and their loved ones."

Copyright 2013 BigM All World Rights Expressly Reserved