Sunday, 23 November 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA - As Texas Indicted Idiot lameduck Governor Rick "Payback" Perry continued to call upon someone anyone and everyone to sue United States President Barack Obama for something anything and everything the Ninth Amendment meanwhile seemingly was prevented by interfering parties or circumstances as described in the Ninth Amendment's recent reply to a reader's inquiry as to upcoming articles on the subject of problems experienced with Google-reported Blogger statistics to a publisher such as the Ninth Amendment's site owner. The Ninth Amendment is committed fully to take whatever measures are necessary to assist in the investigation and corrective action required to insure the best possible presentation possible of the Ninth Amendment site to our readers.
There have been increasingly erratic divergences from what over several years had been this Site's experience with Google's contractually provided ¨accurate up to the minute statistics¨ which figures in the past months repeatedly have proven exponentially less reliable contradictory in their reporting of statistics such as numbers of pageviews depending upon what time period one is examining and then even much more greater discrepancies with Google Analytics.
Just one more in a long list of new irregularities for now being traffic seemingly reaching the site if at all through constantly changing foreign referring URLS and sites rarely seen before. Today for example for some time the highest referring URL/site address was http://goody498.blog27.fc2.com/ with the referral numbers later dropping. In any case however the fact is that it appears to be Japanese blog or journal of some sort with which the Ninth Amendment has no known connection whatsoever. (This is not meant as encouragement to readers to go to that address in any way as the Ninth Amendment has no assurance regarding the integrity of the site nor any information as to why it would been refer readers to the Ninth Amendment.)
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
The Ninth Amendment to the Constitution is the strongest statement therein that powers not expressly granted the State are retained as rights of the People. The State has misconstrued, misrepresented, ignored, and denied the People's rights by elimination of protections reserved alone to them, not recognized by the Supreme Court, the Legislative, and worst the Executive Branch in the illegitimate exercise of draconian powers which unlawfully disparage the inalienable rights of the People.
Showing posts with label contract. Show all posts
Showing posts with label contract. Show all posts
23 November 2014
12 October 2014
BREAKING NEWS: Ebola Texas Second Case Dallas Healthcare Giver Provided Care For Texas Dead Ebola Patient Zero Duncan In Preliminary Examination Tests Positive For Deadly Ebola Virus As Eric Duncan's Family Expands Complaints Against Hospital And State For Growing Series Of Newly Documented Errors And Lies
Sunday, 12 October 2014, DALLAS, TEXAS - Reuters in the link below reports that Texas officials announced early this morning that a healthcare worker who cared for the state's first diagnosed Ebola case that of Liberian citizen Eric Thomas Duncan who 14 days after being turned away and 11 days after being admitted for Ebola three days later to the same hospital died on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital has just tested positive in a preliminary examination for the Ebola virus after the healthcare worker fell ill with a low-grade fever two days ago on Friday, 10 October 2014 who then would be the first person known to have contracted the deadly virus within the state of Texas.
Reporting from the New York Times this morning raises further the possibility that both Mr. Duncan's death from Ebola and the new case reported above need never have happened but for the Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital and its medical staff engaging in a cascading series of potentially catastrophic errors from the moment Mr. Duncan first made the possibly fatal decision initially to enter the doors of that hospital. His family already claiming he received sub-standard care far lower than to two Americans with Ebola who were flown immediately to a qualified Nebraska hospital because he was African now also have obtained hospital medical records showing in addition to mistakenly refusing to admit Mr. Duncan on Sunday, 5 October 2014 when he presented himself with a fever climbed to 103+ F and clearly informed medical staff and the hospital he had just come from Liberia the hospital further sent him out potentially to infect others including the family with whom he stayed after recording his 103+ degree temperature while suffering severe abdominal pains which he reported at a level pain level of over 8 out of 10 and which are frequently aseryre a symptom of Ebola.
Ironically the DEA the next day finally had been permitted to implement its demand of which it had reportedly harangued the FDA for years that prescription pain medications such as hydrocodone for pain be rescheduled to the highest restriction level schedule 2 which it now shares with drugs such as morphine. Doctors throughout the United States are readily aware that as far as the DEA is concerned it is the DEA that routinely illegally practices medicine without a license nor any formal medical knowledge whatsoever through intimidation of the medical community under such threats that physicians' medical decisions have effectively been abdicated by force to the DEA illegally in contradiction of all medical standards and oaths such as the Hippocratic Oath often.
This without physicians admitting the impropriety and illegality of what has occurred that in order actually to practice medicine since the explosion of the fabricated hysteria of the phony losing "war on drugs" which is in which the State often is complicit in dealing drugs the "drug war" now even being extended to prescription drugs legally prescribed by licensed physicians who now might as well skip medical school and its huge associated debt not get an MD but get a GED to join the DEA and illegally practice medicine without a license.
The DEA does not want patients being effectively treated for pain but prefer they remain in agony rather than experience relief even upon entering the hospital which could explain how a patient with a fever of over 103 degrees and complaining of a pain level of over eight out of ten in the abdomen caused by Ebola which can be one of the world's most painful diseases could be dismissed just with antibiotics which are known to be entirely ineffective for a "low grade" or any virus by dishonest emergency physicians and a hospital committing clear malpractice and in violation of their sworn medical oaths out of fear of the DEA and saving their own hides. Thus tossing Mr. Duncan out back to his immediate U.S. family possibly to infect all others with whom he had direct contact or via fluid on surfaces and greatly reduce his chances of surviving.
Mr. Duncan's family further complained that Mr. Duncan was cremated without consulting or even informing the family and that earlier when his family had contacted the hospital after his death the hospital lied by omission in not telling Mr. Duncan's family that he already had died but instead actually intentionally mislead them to believe he was still alive by telling his family "he could not come to the phone". Perhaps the hospital by this point was desperately trying to cover its and its medical staff's growing series of possibly fatal blunders not just to Mr. Duncan but possibly having led to the second Ebola healthcare worker's preliminary positive examination for Ebola today as well as unknown others possibly yet to be identified as by yesterday as CNN reported the hospital had altered its account of events surrounding Mr. Duncan's care with its release now of at least three distinctly different altered versions of the "facts".
The above complaints of the family which also include Texas officials in what has become an avalanche of possibly fatal errors and intentional contradictory altered accounts on the part of at least definitely the hospital can be found in the second article linked to below in today's edition of the New York Times. Previous accounts of the DEA's war on physicians being permitted to practice medicine including with which medications the physicians see fit to use has been reported here in the Ninth Amendment in earlier posts. It is especially ironic that the DEA's war on pain control should coincide exactly with the worst Ebola outbreak in history one of the world's most painful diseases now having reached the shores of the United States.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/12/us-health-ebola-texas-idUSKCN0I10AM20141012?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/us/ebola-victims-family-blames-hospital-and-state.html?action=click&contentCollection=Middle%20East®ion=Footer&module=TopNews&pgtype=article
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Reporting from the New York Times this morning raises further the possibility that both Mr. Duncan's death from Ebola and the new case reported above need never have happened but for the Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital and its medical staff engaging in a cascading series of potentially catastrophic errors from the moment Mr. Duncan first made the possibly fatal decision initially to enter the doors of that hospital. His family already claiming he received sub-standard care far lower than to two Americans with Ebola who were flown immediately to a qualified Nebraska hospital because he was African now also have obtained hospital medical records showing in addition to mistakenly refusing to admit Mr. Duncan on Sunday, 5 October 2014 when he presented himself with a fever climbed to 103+ F and clearly informed medical staff and the hospital he had just come from Liberia the hospital further sent him out potentially to infect others including the family with whom he stayed after recording his 103+ degree temperature while suffering severe abdominal pains which he reported at a level pain level of over 8 out of 10 and which are frequently aseryre a symptom of Ebola.
Ironically the DEA the next day finally had been permitted to implement its demand of which it had reportedly harangued the FDA for years that prescription pain medications such as hydrocodone for pain be rescheduled to the highest restriction level schedule 2 which it now shares with drugs such as morphine. Doctors throughout the United States are readily aware that as far as the DEA is concerned it is the DEA that routinely illegally practices medicine without a license nor any formal medical knowledge whatsoever through intimidation of the medical community under such threats that physicians' medical decisions have effectively been abdicated by force to the DEA illegally in contradiction of all medical standards and oaths such as the Hippocratic Oath often.
This without physicians admitting the impropriety and illegality of what has occurred that in order actually to practice medicine since the explosion of the fabricated hysteria of the phony losing "war on drugs" which is in which the State often is complicit in dealing drugs the "drug war" now even being extended to prescription drugs legally prescribed by licensed physicians who now might as well skip medical school and its huge associated debt not get an MD but get a GED to join the DEA and illegally practice medicine without a license.
The DEA does not want patients being effectively treated for pain but prefer they remain in agony rather than experience relief even upon entering the hospital which could explain how a patient with a fever of over 103 degrees and complaining of a pain level of over eight out of ten in the abdomen caused by Ebola which can be one of the world's most painful diseases could be dismissed just with antibiotics which are known to be entirely ineffective for a "low grade" or any virus by dishonest emergency physicians and a hospital committing clear malpractice and in violation of their sworn medical oaths out of fear of the DEA and saving their own hides. Thus tossing Mr. Duncan out back to his immediate U.S. family possibly to infect all others with whom he had direct contact or via fluid on surfaces and greatly reduce his chances of surviving.
Mr. Duncan's family further complained that Mr. Duncan was cremated without consulting or even informing the family and that earlier when his family had contacted the hospital after his death the hospital lied by omission in not telling Mr. Duncan's family that he already had died but instead actually intentionally mislead them to believe he was still alive by telling his family "he could not come to the phone". Perhaps the hospital by this point was desperately trying to cover its and its medical staff's growing series of possibly fatal blunders not just to Mr. Duncan but possibly having led to the second Ebola healthcare worker's preliminary positive examination for Ebola today as well as unknown others possibly yet to be identified as by yesterday as CNN reported the hospital had altered its account of events surrounding Mr. Duncan's care with its release now of at least three distinctly different altered versions of the "facts".
The above complaints of the family which also include Texas officials in what has become an avalanche of possibly fatal errors and intentional contradictory altered accounts on the part of at least definitely the hospital can be found in the second article linked to below in today's edition of the New York Times. Previous accounts of the DEA's war on physicians being permitted to practice medicine including with which medications the physicians see fit to use has been reported here in the Ninth Amendment in earlier posts. It is especially ironic that the DEA's war on pain control should coincide exactly with the worst Ebola outbreak in history one of the world's most painful diseases now having reached the shores of the United States.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/12/us-health-ebola-texas-idUSKCN0I10AM20141012?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/12/us/ebola-victims-family-blames-hospital-and-state.html?action=click&contentCollection=Middle%20East®ion=Footer&module=TopNews&pgtype=article
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
30 September 2014
Insured Patients Who Go To "In-Network" Hospitals Ambushed By Huge Bills From "Contract" ER Doctors Who Accept No Insurance
Tuesday, 30 September 2014, NEW YORK, NEW YORK - The New York Times in the first of a series of articles on the shameful state of the United States healthcare system to which interested readers may follow the below link reports that fully insured patients who are careful to use "in-network" hospitals still are increasingly completely ambushed by later surprise huge bills particularly for "contract" Emergency Room (ER) physicians by whom they have no choice but to be seen having been made to sign mountains of forms when usually waiting in distress in the ER which they are in no condition to read nor understand but are given to believe they must sign or die which means they essentially are signing under duress incomprehensible to them pre-prepared documents with no opportunity and in no condition to understand nor give meaningful agreement.
This effectively means these piles of documents are worse even than for example the printed insurance company "adhesion contracts" which courts invalidated as unenforceable non-contracts almost a century ago as not fulfilling fundamental requirements of contract law such as a meeting of the minds and moreover being completely invalidated by the fact that attempts to bind people to such documents merely by having them sign them in such circumstances is per se unconscionable. As by the way are the fees often charged by the ER "contract" doctors as documented in the Times article which gives examples of even physicians bringing family members in for care and objecting to "contract" ER doctor bills as absolutely outrageous. Also when being gouged for such simple things as putting in eight stitches later followed by a surprise out-of-network surgeon's bill for $4,878.
Apparently many ER doctors often just gouge completely uninformed patients for relatively simple procedures because being an "ER doctor" was not even a specialty until the 1980's meaning that if any complicated medical work has to be done it still needs to be done by an actual medical specialist and not just someone who is merely a specialist at overbilling unknowing patients in distress and protecting their precious medical licenses by undermedicating patients in serious pain and distress because they are too scared of the DEA, the FDA and/or the state medical board so whenever possible they leave that risky problem to the actual treating physician they tell patients they must see as soon as possible anyway.
The Ninth Amendment wishes this could be said to be the exception and not the rule but the hard numbers prove otherwise. There have to be a great many ER doctors seriously overcharging to have in a period of just the past four years driven the average ER doctor's annual income up from $247,000 to $311,000 during an era of near zero and even negative inflation and when the average American's real income has not even yet risen back to previous levels. The Times horror stories include an ER physician charging $2,000 for having a patient hooked up to a heart monitor for a few hours before being released. In the stitching case mentioned above an out-of-network surgeon (not ER doctor) saved the day in the ER by putting eight stitches in a girl's chin and later charging $4,878 creatively coding his valiant work as "open wound, jaw, complicated". The Times did not detail if "complicated" referred to the procedure of putting in eight stitches or for thinking up a word that could possibly justify charging that amount for putting in just eight stitches and not getting sued (good thing it was not Medicare).
Likewise ER physicians' overcharging now has driven up their average annual incomes to more than that of all the previously most notoriously expensive out-of-network specialists being anesthesiologists, radiologists and pathologists (who best we recall often used to be want-to-be surgeons with challenges like alcohol problems who were directed away to a specialty where the patients were already dead) for basically looking at bloodwork, ordering x-rays, oh yes having nurses glance at heart monitors, and interrogating any patient who believes they need medicine that the physician possibly believes might be abused with any subsequent doctor then de rigeur giving an inconsistent explanation of why it cannot be prescribed.
It has been the experience of the Ninth Amendment that most but not all such physicians lie to patients on such matters more creatively than many law enforcement officers sworn on a witness stand and that is pretty bad. Even the ER physicians' spokesman Dr. Jeffrey Bettinger, chairman of the reimbursement committee of the American College of Emergency Physicians, apparently could not help himself from lying to the New York Times when he "said that out-of-network emergency room doctors were an unusual phenomenon and expressed doubt that the practice was widespread". Actually the Times reported that the occurrence of out-or-network emergency room doctors indeed was "widespread" having now risen to an overwhelming 65% in the Nation's emergency rooms.
In fact the Ninth Amendment actually has been informed by emergency physicians for example in a Florida hospital that it is the policy of the State of Florida that because of the high level of abuse of pain medication that patients no longer can be treated at the hospital for previously existing pain conditions. We suggest the license plate slogan be changed from "Florida The Sunshine State" to "Florida It Is Going To Hurt A Little" superimposed over a five thousand dollar invoice rather than an orange. When the Ninth Amendment asked nurses if they had had many cases of deaths by prescription pain medicine overdoses coming in to the hospital they were able to remember none other than ones in which hospital anesthesiologists had accidentally given patients additional doses of pain medicine on the operating table after they forgot they already had given patients pain medicine which then overdosed them. Anyway pain apparently is now one less worry for ER "specialists" at least in Florida since they can let the State and the DEA practice medicine without a license and just follow orders and not treat it.
THE NINTH AMENDMENT IS IN NO WAY QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE MEDICAL NOR LEGAL ADVICE. READERS SEEKING LEGAL OR MEDICAL ADVICE OR CARE MUST CONSULT A PROPERLY QUALIFIED LICENSED LEGAL OR MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL.
The Ninth Amendment sympathizes that the situation exposed by the New York Times in the article with link below describes an impossibly frustrating situation for even readers who take every possible reasonable step to see that they are not shocked by what would seem to be a blatantly unfair circumstance that may arise especially in the case of a medical emergency for which they rightfully believe they have taken all apparent possible prudent precautions to avoid surprise unscrupulous catastrophic costs and expenses for which they have purchased and/or arranged insurance or other health cost coverage to the best of their ability.
It is apparent that the Times describes a healthcare system that is broken and completely unworthy of a country blessed with the great God-given resources of our Nation. How can President Obama repeatedly say in good conscience that the United States has "the best military the world has ever known" fully aware that he can say no such thing about the United States healthcare system? Although the Ninth Amendment can offer no suggestion at this time of a considered workable long-term solution it is our lay opinion in the meantime that given our understanding that all hospitals are obligated to provide emergency medical care to all patients who enter in need of it until such time as they have been stabilized properly with appropriate arrangements made for their continued care that the signing of prepared documentation in conditions such as those as set forth above is arguably unconscionable and cannot be a requirement of necessary medical treatment.
Rather than argue the point based on past experience we would be inclined to refrain from signing documents which we are in no condition to understand nor able to meaningfully signify agreement but rather simply scribble "I willl not pay" and hand them back as if they had been signed. But then that may just be us.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/29/us/costs-can-go-up-fast-when-er-is-in-network-but-the-doctors-are-not.html?src=me&module=Ribbon&version=origin®ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Most%20Emailed&pgtype=article
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
This effectively means these piles of documents are worse even than for example the printed insurance company "adhesion contracts" which courts invalidated as unenforceable non-contracts almost a century ago as not fulfilling fundamental requirements of contract law such as a meeting of the minds and moreover being completely invalidated by the fact that attempts to bind people to such documents merely by having them sign them in such circumstances is per se unconscionable. As by the way are the fees often charged by the ER "contract" doctors as documented in the Times article which gives examples of even physicians bringing family members in for care and objecting to "contract" ER doctor bills as absolutely outrageous. Also when being gouged for such simple things as putting in eight stitches later followed by a surprise out-of-network surgeon's bill for $4,878.
Apparently many ER doctors often just gouge completely uninformed patients for relatively simple procedures because being an "ER doctor" was not even a specialty until the 1980's meaning that if any complicated medical work has to be done it still needs to be done by an actual medical specialist and not just someone who is merely a specialist at overbilling unknowing patients in distress and protecting their precious medical licenses by undermedicating patients in serious pain and distress because they are too scared of the DEA, the FDA and/or the state medical board so whenever possible they leave that risky problem to the actual treating physician they tell patients they must see as soon as possible anyway.
The Ninth Amendment wishes this could be said to be the exception and not the rule but the hard numbers prove otherwise. There have to be a great many ER doctors seriously overcharging to have in a period of just the past four years driven the average ER doctor's annual income up from $247,000 to $311,000 during an era of near zero and even negative inflation and when the average American's real income has not even yet risen back to previous levels. The Times horror stories include an ER physician charging $2,000 for having a patient hooked up to a heart monitor for a few hours before being released. In the stitching case mentioned above an out-of-network surgeon (not ER doctor) saved the day in the ER by putting eight stitches in a girl's chin and later charging $4,878 creatively coding his valiant work as "open wound, jaw, complicated". The Times did not detail if "complicated" referred to the procedure of putting in eight stitches or for thinking up a word that could possibly justify charging that amount for putting in just eight stitches and not getting sued (good thing it was not Medicare).
Likewise ER physicians' overcharging now has driven up their average annual incomes to more than that of all the previously most notoriously expensive out-of-network specialists being anesthesiologists, radiologists and pathologists (who best we recall often used to be want-to-be surgeons with challenges like alcohol problems who were directed away to a specialty where the patients were already dead) for basically looking at bloodwork, ordering x-rays, oh yes having nurses glance at heart monitors, and interrogating any patient who believes they need medicine that the physician possibly believes might be abused with any subsequent doctor then de rigeur giving an inconsistent explanation of why it cannot be prescribed.
It has been the experience of the Ninth Amendment that most but not all such physicians lie to patients on such matters more creatively than many law enforcement officers sworn on a witness stand and that is pretty bad. Even the ER physicians' spokesman Dr. Jeffrey Bettinger, chairman of the reimbursement committee of the American College of Emergency Physicians, apparently could not help himself from lying to the New York Times when he "said that out-of-network emergency room doctors were an unusual phenomenon and expressed doubt that the practice was widespread". Actually the Times reported that the occurrence of out-or-network emergency room doctors indeed was "widespread" having now risen to an overwhelming 65% in the Nation's emergency rooms.
In fact the Ninth Amendment actually has been informed by emergency physicians for example in a Florida hospital that it is the policy of the State of Florida that because of the high level of abuse of pain medication that patients no longer can be treated at the hospital for previously existing pain conditions. We suggest the license plate slogan be changed from "Florida The Sunshine State" to "Florida It Is Going To Hurt A Little" superimposed over a five thousand dollar invoice rather than an orange. When the Ninth Amendment asked nurses if they had had many cases of deaths by prescription pain medicine overdoses coming in to the hospital they were able to remember none other than ones in which hospital anesthesiologists had accidentally given patients additional doses of pain medicine on the operating table after they forgot they already had given patients pain medicine which then overdosed them. Anyway pain apparently is now one less worry for ER "specialists" at least in Florida since they can let the State and the DEA practice medicine without a license and just follow orders and not treat it.
THE NINTH AMENDMENT IS IN NO WAY QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE MEDICAL NOR LEGAL ADVICE. READERS SEEKING LEGAL OR MEDICAL ADVICE OR CARE MUST CONSULT A PROPERLY QUALIFIED LICENSED LEGAL OR MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL.
The Ninth Amendment sympathizes that the situation exposed by the New York Times in the article with link below describes an impossibly frustrating situation for even readers who take every possible reasonable step to see that they are not shocked by what would seem to be a blatantly unfair circumstance that may arise especially in the case of a medical emergency for which they rightfully believe they have taken all apparent possible prudent precautions to avoid surprise unscrupulous catastrophic costs and expenses for which they have purchased and/or arranged insurance or other health cost coverage to the best of their ability.
It is apparent that the Times describes a healthcare system that is broken and completely unworthy of a country blessed with the great God-given resources of our Nation. How can President Obama repeatedly say in good conscience that the United States has "the best military the world has ever known" fully aware that he can say no such thing about the United States healthcare system? Although the Ninth Amendment can offer no suggestion at this time of a considered workable long-term solution it is our lay opinion in the meantime that given our understanding that all hospitals are obligated to provide emergency medical care to all patients who enter in need of it until such time as they have been stabilized properly with appropriate arrangements made for their continued care that the signing of prepared documentation in conditions such as those as set forth above is arguably unconscionable and cannot be a requirement of necessary medical treatment.
Rather than argue the point based on past experience we would be inclined to refrain from signing documents which we are in no condition to understand nor able to meaningfully signify agreement but rather simply scribble "I willl not pay" and hand them back as if they had been signed. But then that may just be us.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/29/us/costs-can-go-up-fast-when-er-is-in-network-but-the-doctors-are-not.html?src=me&module=Ribbon&version=origin®ion=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Most%20Emailed&pgtype=article
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
03 August 2014
GOOGLE aka "KNOWN ISSUES" May Change Name To "GOO-GLITCH" Denotes Multitude Of Faulty Products Once Known To Buyers Simply As "Defective". Please GOO-GLITCH Has No Time To Answer Piddling Questions So Beneath Its Giant Piles Of Cash About KNOWN ISSUES Replaces Nothing Unless One Bought "The Plan" But Please Feel Free To Gnaw In On Our Unpaid "Buddies Circle Jerkle" Best Known Guesses So We Can Sell Your Personal Info ID'ing You Too In "Buddies Circle Jerkle" Social Media
Sunday, 3 August 2014, MOUNTAIN "OF CASH" VIEW, CALIFORNIA -Well Blogger friends and domestic help are any of you getting nearly as rich as Google yet letting Google aka KNOWN ISSUES data mine your every contact and interest that you were not even sure you had with their relatively recently joined or merely just more encouraged and patted on their heads by (but never yet consciously -- to them -- punished with the old water board) their new best CIA friends who coincidentally almost magically just have found themselves just so very simultaneously as fascinated as Google with every activity in your life. It is all just money to Google whether the information for commercial social media wars and incidental bonuses from the CIA comes in through Blogger+ or the old "sponsored results" that never ever would have happened on so reputably academic a search engine as Google until of course they did.
So when did Google and the others like Zuckerboy begin to feel so sure they were above the law (probably from a little too much exposure to those charged with enforcing the law against "others") that they for example apparently can claim when they never answer you except in court sell you products which were previously just known as "defective" junk but never anymore return for refund but instead have developed to the point that they have the audacity to tell you they do no even answer phones about defects but just maybe you can "circle buddy" with some of the thousands of others who also have suffered through their so-called "beta" defects and will be happy to commiserate but please just be clear on one thing most importantly which is even if GOO-GLITCH aka KNOWN ISSUES gives those unpaid geeks a few unpaid ribbons everything they come up with is strictly answered on their own behalves and NO KNOWN ISSUES guarantees nothing except any royalties coming from more social media data mining belongs to them (and their CIA partners) alone.
As for the shared problems new "jerkle buddy circle" users are experiencing while Google is busy designing the next generation of planned obsolescence or rather planned defects in its next generation of products while also figuring out ways to get users (or "used ones") to sign off every detail or access to every detail of jerkle buddy life from birth to death and everything inbetween which is pretty crafty because actually in one's "real" social life whatever that used to be none of these geeks were ever your "friends" and would not have merited another scoff if you caught them trying to chart and graph every aspect of your social life which was so much more interesting to them than their own existence spent with their own best friend the Asteroids machine.
And you were beginning to think that you were just perhaps nothing but not quite mostly up-to-par "bloggers" raking it in which was after all the original "idea" as advertised was it not although coincidentally or not that was just around the time the NSA, CIA and rest of the national acronym crowd began to give Google perhaps just an inkling of the real value of that "Blogger" sky's the limit up-to-the-minute (very roughly speaking) was perhaps after all not really quite so much the focus of the whole "operation" as might have perhaps a bit more honestly been communicated. No now Google makes a fortune off of your Person+ for which you are not getting a dime except new bunch of "freinds" for your "circle of jerkles".
In fact that part of the tale after seeing a United States President ELECTED after all and all those heady skirmishes just at the shaky borders of the foundation in the age of "terrible secrets" of the United States Constitution once held so dear by so many well that part of the tale really did not seem so "compelling" nor so "heady" to the ones now become in the know and dining with the spooks outside Mclean that it really may have begun to slip their swimming minds just a bit amidst all these heady developments that there were, well, starting to be what rapidly had become the "cover story" that clearly was not nearly so exciting nor PROFITABLE as some of the other stories.
Well fellow Bloggers we urge you for the moment not to rush into the Blogger+ deal and spend a bit of time asking yourself whether you really deep down feel some COMPELLING REASON to find yourself sharing yourself and so much of your life with some people who well quite frankly as of just a couple years ago may not have even really known from Adam. Remember when you perhaps wanted to prove yourself personally with a successful bit of writing well-received by an audience which was not "scientifically" determined and placed among your, what, followers?
We ask for now that you just might wish to collect your thoughts for a bit and not jump into putting that + after your personal "profile" information maybe more so as to release its disclosure from a legal point of view and to take Google forward leaps and bounds in some perhaps new merely greedy direction whereby it might get its hands ASAP on that "social media" information from Facebook and the others if not by some in-kind trade that strengthens it all then some sort of clever tact at getting you to actually feel some sort of eagerness to part with that information you might not ever have even dreamed of with a company in ten short years become larger than General Motors and you really are not even sure why. There is after all no big rush. Except perhaps for when the time comes that we all decide to go after Google itself for fraud, class action, punitive damages, invasion of privacy, psychological manipulation by methods of the always jury-loved cult?
Yes please friends keep us in mind if your statistics that are promised to be accurate and timely seem increasingly are neither. That all that Adsense and other advertising program money you have heard so much of the old favorite Ronald Reagan "anecdotal evidence of" such as quite amazing riches or financial independence or in any case close to it are not quite coming true for you yet either. But then there is always SO MUCH more new information provided by Google and it is no doubt "well" paid acting agents that may not always make that much sense nor seem that revolutionary, but what the heck after just six or seven years why not give them a chance, ESPECIALLY if you have already started your own business.
Yes friends we sense a new day dawning and since it is one where both a federal agency or agencies and a very rich company or companies who have indeed demonstrated indeed that they do have VERY DEEP pockets we first of all DISCLAIM ANY SPECIAL LEGAL OR FINANCIAL EXPERTISE IN THIS AREA WHICH YOU MUST SEEK ONLY FROM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL, but may we suggest that in the meantime we proceed carefully and cautiously keeping as best we can accurate records of what we were promised or APPEARED TO BE and WHAT WE ACTUALLY HAVE OR HAVE APPEARED TO RECEIVE. In the meantime we are keeping a very close watch on whether those pageview numbers which Google has provided with growing inaccuracy as freely can be followed in our posts are keeping up commensurate where historical performance would indicate they should be and with these recent efforts even better perhaps maybe even more so God willing with your support which as you are all too aware costs fellow "bloggers" nothing. Just imagine a million bloggers all standing up for one million other bloggers.
And should we see those growing numbers of pageviews and ad impressions continuing to grow well then we shall also have very good grounds for examining and ask that KNOWN ISSUE is being especially diligent and careful about reporting them completely and timely as that after all was to be at least what is appearing to us as what may be for all of us who choose and performed for Google as our part of the bargain and therefore must especially taking care to make sure that we too benefit richly where they have from our own "benefit of the bargain" and also having done so kept us from putting or fortunes with those of so many competitors for our work from whom Google lured us. And make no mistake as for the specifics of each of us, it is each of us who is putting in the work, writing all the feedback and looking for those non-existent Google return letters. Stay strong, read on, and let those of us who continue on this path remember where lies the true path and reward of "mutual support".
Let GOOGLE have its KNOWN issues fellow Bloggers we shall have our MUTUAL SUPPORT. So pay attention and in the the unforgettable words of Douglas Adams on the cover of The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy "DON'T PANIC". Just keep track of that money GOOGLE owes you from mathematical errors or selling your social media without your permission to sell and soon those + signs will be adding up in your column also. We hope.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
So when did Google and the others like Zuckerboy begin to feel so sure they were above the law (probably from a little too much exposure to those charged with enforcing the law against "others") that they for example apparently can claim when they never answer you except in court sell you products which were previously just known as "defective" junk but never anymore return for refund but instead have developed to the point that they have the audacity to tell you they do no even answer phones about defects but just maybe you can "circle buddy" with some of the thousands of others who also have suffered through their so-called "beta" defects and will be happy to commiserate but please just be clear on one thing most importantly which is even if GOO-GLITCH aka KNOWN ISSUES gives those unpaid geeks a few unpaid ribbons everything they come up with is strictly answered on their own behalves and NO KNOWN ISSUES guarantees nothing except any royalties coming from more social media data mining belongs to them (and their CIA partners) alone.
As for the shared problems new "jerkle buddy circle" users are experiencing while Google is busy designing the next generation of planned obsolescence or rather planned defects in its next generation of products while also figuring out ways to get users (or "used ones") to sign off every detail or access to every detail of jerkle buddy life from birth to death and everything inbetween which is pretty crafty because actually in one's "real" social life whatever that used to be none of these geeks were ever your "friends" and would not have merited another scoff if you caught them trying to chart and graph every aspect of your social life which was so much more interesting to them than their own existence spent with their own best friend the Asteroids machine.
And you were beginning to think that you were just perhaps nothing but not quite mostly up-to-par "bloggers" raking it in which was after all the original "idea" as advertised was it not although coincidentally or not that was just around the time the NSA, CIA and rest of the national acronym crowd began to give Google perhaps just an inkling of the real value of that "Blogger" sky's the limit up-to-the-minute (very roughly speaking) was perhaps after all not really quite so much the focus of the whole "operation" as might have perhaps a bit more honestly been communicated. No now Google makes a fortune off of your Person+ for which you are not getting a dime except new bunch of "freinds" for your "circle of jerkles".
In fact that part of the tale after seeing a United States President ELECTED after all and all those heady skirmishes just at the shaky borders of the foundation in the age of "terrible secrets" of the United States Constitution once held so dear by so many well that part of the tale really did not seem so "compelling" nor so "heady" to the ones now become in the know and dining with the spooks outside Mclean that it really may have begun to slip their swimming minds just a bit amidst all these heady developments that there were, well, starting to be what rapidly had become the "cover story" that clearly was not nearly so exciting nor PROFITABLE as some of the other stories.
Well fellow Bloggers we urge you for the moment not to rush into the Blogger+ deal and spend a bit of time asking yourself whether you really deep down feel some COMPELLING REASON to find yourself sharing yourself and so much of your life with some people who well quite frankly as of just a couple years ago may not have even really known from Adam. Remember when you perhaps wanted to prove yourself personally with a successful bit of writing well-received by an audience which was not "scientifically" determined and placed among your, what, followers?
We ask for now that you just might wish to collect your thoughts for a bit and not jump into putting that + after your personal "profile" information maybe more so as to release its disclosure from a legal point of view and to take Google forward leaps and bounds in some perhaps new merely greedy direction whereby it might get its hands ASAP on that "social media" information from Facebook and the others if not by some in-kind trade that strengthens it all then some sort of clever tact at getting you to actually feel some sort of eagerness to part with that information you might not ever have even dreamed of with a company in ten short years become larger than General Motors and you really are not even sure why. There is after all no big rush. Except perhaps for when the time comes that we all decide to go after Google itself for fraud, class action, punitive damages, invasion of privacy, psychological manipulation by methods of the always jury-loved cult?
Yes please friends keep us in mind if your statistics that are promised to be accurate and timely seem increasingly are neither. That all that Adsense and other advertising program money you have heard so much of the old favorite Ronald Reagan "anecdotal evidence of" such as quite amazing riches or financial independence or in any case close to it are not quite coming true for you yet either. But then there is always SO MUCH more new information provided by Google and it is no doubt "well" paid acting agents that may not always make that much sense nor seem that revolutionary, but what the heck after just six or seven years why not give them a chance, ESPECIALLY if you have already started your own business.
Yes friends we sense a new day dawning and since it is one where both a federal agency or agencies and a very rich company or companies who have indeed demonstrated indeed that they do have VERY DEEP pockets we first of all DISCLAIM ANY SPECIAL LEGAL OR FINANCIAL EXPERTISE IN THIS AREA WHICH YOU MUST SEEK ONLY FROM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL, but may we suggest that in the meantime we proceed carefully and cautiously keeping as best we can accurate records of what we were promised or APPEARED TO BE and WHAT WE ACTUALLY HAVE OR HAVE APPEARED TO RECEIVE. In the meantime we are keeping a very close watch on whether those pageview numbers which Google has provided with growing inaccuracy as freely can be followed in our posts are keeping up commensurate where historical performance would indicate they should be and with these recent efforts even better perhaps maybe even more so God willing with your support which as you are all too aware costs fellow "bloggers" nothing. Just imagine a million bloggers all standing up for one million other bloggers.
And should we see those growing numbers of pageviews and ad impressions continuing to grow well then we shall also have very good grounds for examining and ask that KNOWN ISSUE is being especially diligent and careful about reporting them completely and timely as that after all was to be at least what is appearing to us as what may be for all of us who choose and performed for Google as our part of the bargain and therefore must especially taking care to make sure that we too benefit richly where they have from our own "benefit of the bargain" and also having done so kept us from putting or fortunes with those of so many competitors for our work from whom Google lured us. And make no mistake as for the specifics of each of us, it is each of us who is putting in the work, writing all the feedback and looking for those non-existent Google return letters. Stay strong, read on, and let those of us who continue on this path remember where lies the true path and reward of "mutual support".
Let GOOGLE have its KNOWN issues fellow Bloggers we shall have our MUTUAL SUPPORT. So pay attention and in the the unforgettable words of Douglas Adams on the cover of The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy "DON'T PANIC". Just keep track of that money GOOGLE owes you from mathematical errors or selling your social media without your permission to sell and soon those + signs will be adding up in your column also. We hope.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
10 April 2014
CREDO Mobile $15 Off Monthly Readers' Voice Bill No Contract Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) New Offer
Thursday, 10 April 2014, SAN FRANCISCO - The Ninth Amendment's readers overwhelmingly have responded favorably to the reproduced CREDO (Working Assets Mobile) post here months earlier offering readers who switch to CREDO immediately to pay off readers' full remaining time contracts chained to other major mobile phone network hell with consistently right-wing carriers including AT&T, Sprint and Verizon, which among other things are huge contributors to politicians such as Senator Ted "Superstupid" Cruz and his travelling Tea Party brain dead.
For readers who missed that earlier post to cash out readers' major evil carrier contract at CREDO's expense when switching to CREDO service readers may find that post with either the "Search Box" at the right or in the all-time most popular posts listed below the current posts at the bottom center of this page.
The Ninth Amendment here belatedly due to continuing New Zealand corruption-related interference as detailed in other posts again here has copied verbatim the new CREDO solicitation with links we received from CREDO for a new offer to take $15 off CREDO's monthly voice service when readers Bring Your Own Device (BYOD).
CREDO is the technological mobile socially-conscious successor to San Francisco's Working Assets Long Distance. Working Assets long has provided its customers with monthly free long distance opportunities and direct telephone contact information to share with persons in power such as their Washington, D.C. representatives a piece of their mind on current issues. CREDO follows that tradition with steady streams of circulated petitions and communications on pressing issues appropriate to these times.
The Ninth Amendment as always when presenting some product, service or related consumer issue in the body of a post receives absolutely no pay, no other remuneration whatsoever, nor does anyone or entity for posting this for our readers' evaluation. Nor has the post been communicated with CREDO in any way.
|
Copyright 2014 M. Pesaresi All World Rights Expressly Reserved (No claim to CREDO material)
14 October 2013
Google Users And Developers BEWARE Google Lawyers' Unilateral Rule Changes "Effective" 11 November 2013
Sunday, 13 October 2013, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA. - Well we all know that this is the day and this is the age when a very strange thing has occurred with contracts and other areas of law. As best we of the Ninth Amendment Editorial Board recall there were a great many tenets of the law stretching far back to the common law that long predated the TYRANNY OF THE CORPORATIONS SUCH AS GOOGLE. How long must we close our eyes and pretend that we are utterly blind to the fundamental concepts of the great foundations of the once great and now completely eviscerated foundations of the legal system as handed down from the ironclad principles of such things as the English Common Law?
Was it not any longer ago than our parents' lifetimes that institutions engaging in the practices of our banks, our credit card companies, our insurance companies and all that ilk would be taken out and strung up for the practices they have come to embrace with reckless abandon today crushing the ordinary workingperson with unilateral after-the-fact dictates of once-"loans" now become champions of "usury" and all form of injustice from which they no longer are held back by any form of BILATERAL (yes, that is correct, two parties) agreement rather than by one party's "fiat".
Does anyone remember when a contract was a "meeting of the minds", does anyone remember such quaint concepts as a mutuality of consideration and things such as "terms and conditions" which actually were agreed to by the parties rather than simply ANNOUNCED by one party to the other, well, readers here we go again. . . .
Now does anyone really know what in the world Google has been up to enslaving over two million families around the world allegedly writing their blogs amidst GREAT TALES OF RICHES while how rarely is it that we ever see them actually come to fruition except of course Google's latest joint schemes with the CIA to do what we do not know? Well readers we have been at this Ninth Amendment log some time now and there must be a leak somewhere in our piggy bank. That is all we can imagine as we have yet to receive even our first advertising pay?
Well be warned Google if these young (yes of course 18+) children can make theirs and their families' fortunes we have decided that we too now shall read up and try to make sense of every bit of this endless series of Google pages that always to point both ways at the bottom (ever seen that one before?) yet never seem to come to any conclusion which yields any more MONEY for the faithful. Google cannot just be in the business of making 2 million families rich, can it? No thank you we do not want anymore "followers" and "+1ers" nor "circles of Google friends", we are going to figure this out once and for all and demand some accounting of exactly in what amounts and to whom and for how long those first checks and long since direct deposits started to flow. We are owed an accounting are we not? Perhaps a FOIA to the right-placed federal agencies?
We do come carrying some news of WARNING, HOWEVER, GOOGLERS! You have been warned if you weed carefully through the endlessly back circling computer text screens so start reading up ahead of next month. Yes come 11 November 2013 or on or about same day thereabouts the UNILATERAL GOOGLE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ARE CHANGING ONCE AGAIN.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. READ IT IN ADVANCE, AND JUST TRY AND FIGURE OUT WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT, OR ASK YOUR LAWYER IF YOU HAVE ENOUGH TIED UP IN IT. ASSUME IT IS NOT IN YOUR BEST INTEREST. NOW, EVERYONE, ALL TOGETHER NOW, LET US MAKE SOME MONEY AT THIS THING. GO, GO, GO, EVEN IF YOU NEED WRITE 500 BLOGS EACH WITH 499 FULL OF GOOGLE-SANCTIONED "ADULT MATERIAL".
As best we can tell you do not need to tell anyone your real name, your real anything, except maybe the tax man, except for now your "Circle of Friends" can "repay the favor" according to Google and repay all the writing you have done with some recommendations where they send on your work to be re-advertised, re-monetized, re-Bloggerized in its entirety.
Remember that date November 11, 2003, and try to figure out exactly what it is they are up to right to THIS TIME now what have have they planned right that very minute? Roll out the Blogs, Google we are ready for our share of that cash and so much for your "contracts" your "terms and conditions" that are neither but dunenforceable unilateral breaches of contract. Show us the money!
Now we are no practicing lawyers but we bet that Google has a few lawyers themselves who might explain (to Google in any case) why is it that Google NEEDS TO CHANGE UNILATERALLY THOSE "TERMS" AND "CONDITIONS" such that Google can take and adapt the Google's developers' (that is right, "us", we their friends) "intellectual property" developed for challenges but only for things such as Google's "business purposes" but otherwise "totally" respect our "intellectual property" rights oh yes, yes, really indeed to our ideas.
Funny we did not see any such language going the other way? Nothing about us being able to make fair and necessary use of Google's "intellectual property". Oh, no, no, quite the opposite. After all we "developers" are not their "employees", we certainly have not been afforded those kinds of rights and assurances of employees have we? No reason Google should have acquired any rights to any intellectual property we might develop on OUR OWN TIME or why WE SHOULD NOT SUE GOOGLE should it mistakenly ascertain that after it it really did need "OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" to further Google's "BUSINESS PURPOSES".
Any chance Google might actually write these things down say ON PAPER and STAPLE and COLLATE them in order? So much easier to try and make sense of one's terms and conditions if they are not presented to one in what appear to be home-made movies made by virtual children whom one is not even sure work for Google or, alas, do not?
Oh we can be so picky! Any chance Google might actually have its lawyers prepare say just a little itsy-bitsy statement that some people might wish actually to have their own lawyers look over all this material presented in such a DECEPTIVELY OFF-HAND WAY? Just a guess. Sometimes we scare ourselves we seem to make so much more sense than the ones who are paid so much NOT to get GOOGLE SUED? Finally while we are at it the "Terms and Conditions" do seem to anticipate at least the possibility of less than total harmony, their close making clear (unilaterally of course) that should their be any little disagreement that "Calfiornia Law Shall Govern". Only that is "As to choice of law provisions".
Any of you twenty-year-old developers happen to have a clue what that might be about? Well, just going out on a limb, let us just guess that Google believes the laws of the Great State of California can be expected to bring a FAVORABLE outcome in any dispute against Google, which after all pays about half the State's budget, does it not? However, in the rare case where Google might not be expected to win , such as to the children's work laws which instead look favorable in say the Great Nation of Tibet, in that case might it not be prudent to have the Googlers pack up their suits and in that one special-circumstance case make at least just that one long flight over to Tibet, give the others a break on that airfare just that once? Sometimes it is just so hard to make sense of what really are one's best ime/tions
Copyright 2013 Little L & Big M All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Was it not any longer ago than our parents' lifetimes that institutions engaging in the practices of our banks, our credit card companies, our insurance companies and all that ilk would be taken out and strung up for the practices they have come to embrace with reckless abandon today crushing the ordinary workingperson with unilateral after-the-fact dictates of once-"loans" now become champions of "usury" and all form of injustice from which they no longer are held back by any form of BILATERAL (yes, that is correct, two parties) agreement rather than by one party's "fiat".
Does anyone remember when a contract was a "meeting of the minds", does anyone remember such quaint concepts as a mutuality of consideration and things such as "terms and conditions" which actually were agreed to by the parties rather than simply ANNOUNCED by one party to the other, well, readers here we go again. . . .
Now does anyone really know what in the world Google has been up to enslaving over two million families around the world allegedly writing their blogs amidst GREAT TALES OF RICHES while how rarely is it that we ever see them actually come to fruition except of course Google's latest joint schemes with the CIA to do what we do not know? Well readers we have been at this Ninth Amendment log some time now and there must be a leak somewhere in our piggy bank. That is all we can imagine as we have yet to receive even our first advertising pay?
Well be warned Google if these young (yes of course 18+) children can make theirs and their families' fortunes we have decided that we too now shall read up and try to make sense of every bit of this endless series of Google pages that always to point both ways at the bottom (ever seen that one before?) yet never seem to come to any conclusion which yields any more MONEY for the faithful. Google cannot just be in the business of making 2 million families rich, can it? No thank you we do not want anymore "followers" and "+1ers" nor "circles of Google friends", we are going to figure this out once and for all and demand some accounting of exactly in what amounts and to whom and for how long those first checks and long since direct deposits started to flow. We are owed an accounting are we not? Perhaps a FOIA to the right-placed federal agencies?
We do come carrying some news of WARNING, HOWEVER, GOOGLERS! You have been warned if you weed carefully through the endlessly back circling computer text screens so start reading up ahead of next month. Yes come 11 November 2013 or on or about same day thereabouts the UNILATERAL GOOGLE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ARE CHANGING ONCE AGAIN.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. READ IT IN ADVANCE, AND JUST TRY AND FIGURE OUT WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT, OR ASK YOUR LAWYER IF YOU HAVE ENOUGH TIED UP IN IT. ASSUME IT IS NOT IN YOUR BEST INTEREST. NOW, EVERYONE, ALL TOGETHER NOW, LET US MAKE SOME MONEY AT THIS THING. GO, GO, GO, EVEN IF YOU NEED WRITE 500 BLOGS EACH WITH 499 FULL OF GOOGLE-SANCTIONED "ADULT MATERIAL".
As best we can tell you do not need to tell anyone your real name, your real anything, except maybe the tax man, except for now your "Circle of Friends" can "repay the favor" according to Google and repay all the writing you have done with some recommendations where they send on your work to be re-advertised, re-monetized, re-Bloggerized in its entirety.
Remember that date November 11, 2003, and try to figure out exactly what it is they are up to right to THIS TIME now what have have they planned right that very minute? Roll out the Blogs, Google we are ready for our share of that cash and so much for your "contracts" your "terms and conditions" that are neither but dunenforceable unilateral breaches of contract. Show us the money!
Now we are no practicing lawyers but we bet that Google has a few lawyers themselves who might explain (to Google in any case) why is it that Google NEEDS TO CHANGE UNILATERALLY THOSE "TERMS" AND "CONDITIONS" such that Google can take and adapt the Google's developers' (that is right, "us", we their friends) "intellectual property" developed for challenges but only for things such as Google's "business purposes" but otherwise "totally" respect our "intellectual property" rights oh yes, yes, really indeed to our ideas.
Funny we did not see any such language going the other way? Nothing about us being able to make fair and necessary use of Google's "intellectual property". Oh, no, no, quite the opposite. After all we "developers" are not their "employees", we certainly have not been afforded those kinds of rights and assurances of employees have we? No reason Google should have acquired any rights to any intellectual property we might develop on OUR OWN TIME or why WE SHOULD NOT SUE GOOGLE should it mistakenly ascertain that after it it really did need "OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" to further Google's "BUSINESS PURPOSES".
Any chance Google might actually write these things down say ON PAPER and STAPLE and COLLATE them in order? So much easier to try and make sense of one's terms and conditions if they are not presented to one in what appear to be home-made movies made by virtual children whom one is not even sure work for Google or, alas, do not?
Oh we can be so picky! Any chance Google might actually have its lawyers prepare say just a little itsy-bitsy statement that some people might wish actually to have their own lawyers look over all this material presented in such a DECEPTIVELY OFF-HAND WAY? Just a guess. Sometimes we scare ourselves we seem to make so much more sense than the ones who are paid so much NOT to get GOOGLE SUED? Finally while we are at it the "Terms and Conditions" do seem to anticipate at least the possibility of less than total harmony, their close making clear (unilaterally of course) that should their be any little disagreement that "Calfiornia Law Shall Govern". Only that is "As to choice of law provisions".
Any of you twenty-year-old developers happen to have a clue what that might be about? Well, just going out on a limb, let us just guess that Google believes the laws of the Great State of California can be expected to bring a FAVORABLE outcome in any dispute against Google, which after all pays about half the State's budget, does it not? However, in the rare case where Google might not be expected to win , such as to the children's work laws which instead look favorable in say the Great Nation of Tibet, in that case might it not be prudent to have the Googlers pack up their suits and in that one special-circumstance case make at least just that one long flight over to Tibet, give the others a break on that airfare just that once? Sometimes it is just so hard to make sense of what really are one's best ime/tions
Copyright 2013 Little L & Big M All World Rights Expressly Reserved
04 October 2013
CREDO Phone Service Save Money Get Your Full Cash Credit Switch Back From ATT And Verizon Contract Hell, Plus Stop Readers' Payments Funding Senator Superstupid Ted Cruz "Tea Party" Titantic Plus All Giant ATT And Verizon Giveaways
Friday, 4 Octobeer 2013, WASHINGTON, D.C. - Superstupid Senator Ted Cruz (R- Texas, surprise, surprise) what more perfect de facto voice of that awesome phenomenon in the United States come to be known as the "Tea Party". The name evokes richly textured small-town communities of mostly more mature thoughtful women discussing topics in knitting circles with others they may have known for decades, not to mention of course the seminal American historical Revolutionary event which started the United States on its long and hard-fought road to independence.
Only fitting that Cruzian "Tea Partiers" of today distort that essential foundation of our Nation's history to debase it to a series of meaningless noisemaker events worthy of nothing more than the decimation of a collapsing country. Only this country to be rendered once again into the Republicans' timelessly failed recipe for repeated homeland economic disasters a la "Apocalypse Now", copyright the Doors, is our own fault.
As usual the big-slime corporate donors want readers wrongly to believe "they are helpless" but to keep dumping money in the coffers of social pariahs like ATT and Verizon busy using confused callers perpetually extending "contract fees" (i.e. their latest consumer ripoffs) vying for those coveted front tables at the latest iteration of their "Tea Party" luncheon where they can sit just feet (oh boy!) from the Superstupid Tea Partier Supreme (yesterday dragged from the House of Reprsentatives because he did not know which house of Congress to which he belonged blabbing his phony filibuster). Sentaor Cruz may have his no doubt gathering henchman explain to him who is giving what so that it is easier to keep it straight on "payback" day, which in the Republican spirit unabashedly was cemented by former movie star and poster child for the disadvantaged Ronald Reagan.
As best we recall before his Presidential inauguration speech had even begun Reagan's staff already had started working the front rows assuring luminaries such as then Searle President ("Pigheart") Cheney that that pesky aspartame ruling (causes brain cancer, does not everything?) would be reversed as soon as "Big Ron" could be taught to sign (no, NOT PRINT) his name to the orders to the FDA Administrator. No need to wait even until the Administrator could be replaced with someone more "enlightened", or should we say "encumbered" with the famous Cheney signature pallets of crisp new stacks of $100 bills straight from the mint press to the helipad do NOT pass time-consuming bill serial number recording.
Speaking of brain cancer why not FINALLY ALREADY turn our attention back to today and the selfless generosity of ATT and Verizon wireless extended to the "Tea Party" morons and most of all their self-styled brainless leader Senator Ted Cruz, hear the tea spoons clanking around in his empty noggin?). The link below will help fill in those "interested" (or shall we just say "thoroughly nauseated" readers) with fascinating key participation of these well-practiced sleight-of-contract cellphone grifters ATT and Verizon whom we might thank our lucky stars do not get in the automobile sales, leasing and repair business (as far as we know, that is) were we not reasonably confident that they left no stone unturned getting a hand in EVERYONE's pocket except maybe in those countries which do not yet have pockets.
The reported facts are presented in the CREDO cellular service advertisement set out below but are worthy of brief empahsis here. CREDO by the way is the modern-day mobile iteration of Working Assets which was the pioneer in social activism amongst long-distance landline carriers which monthly let its callers make free long-distance telephone calls directly to provided direct-dial numbers of callers representatives in Washington.
The Ninth Amendment log does not take any money or remuneration whatsoever for any commercial interest that we on a unanimous vote of the editorial board believe worth of presenting in the body of a post. We have never spoken or communicated in any way with any such entity when we have made recommendations solely on the basis of our own observations and opinions. Likewise no guarantees, although we try to be sparing with only those recommendations we deem most worthy of mention in hopes that they may raise readers knowledge base and standard of living as better, more broadly informed consumers. The Ninth Amendment does not however exercise any control over advertisements in the borders of this log chosen through an auction process by Google adsense, and on which we give no input. Readers are encouraged as always to do their own research. For allegedly untracked and unrecorded queries on subjects with a secure connection when available the Ninth Amendment frequently does "searches" with qrobe.it (HTTPS) which is so described by Mozilla.org for its Firefox browser as an additional search engine which can be added to the drop-down search box list by going to the term "Manage Search Engines" after which point it remains available on the drop-down list. The link below the CREDO notice contains the terms of the CREDO mobile offer.
Copyright 2014 Big M All World Rights Expressly Reserved (no claim to CREDO material)
http://www.credomobile.com/lp/oct13/25off350em.aspx?pc=318145&aid=5397176&cmp=sep13offer&day=11http://www.credomobile.com/lp/oct13/25off350em.aspx?pc=318145&aid=5397176&cmp=sep13offer&day=11
Only fitting that Cruzian "Tea Partiers" of today distort that essential foundation of our Nation's history to debase it to a series of meaningless noisemaker events worthy of nothing more than the decimation of a collapsing country. Only this country to be rendered once again into the Republicans' timelessly failed recipe for repeated homeland economic disasters a la "Apocalypse Now", copyright the Doors, is our own fault.
As usual the big-slime corporate donors want readers wrongly to believe "they are helpless" but to keep dumping money in the coffers of social pariahs like ATT and Verizon busy using confused callers perpetually extending "contract fees" (i.e. their latest consumer ripoffs) vying for those coveted front tables at the latest iteration of their "Tea Party" luncheon where they can sit just feet (oh boy!) from the Superstupid Tea Partier Supreme (yesterday dragged from the House of Reprsentatives because he did not know which house of Congress to which he belonged blabbing his phony filibuster). Sentaor Cruz may have his no doubt gathering henchman explain to him who is giving what so that it is easier to keep it straight on "payback" day, which in the Republican spirit unabashedly was cemented by former movie star and poster child for the disadvantaged Ronald Reagan.
As best we recall before his Presidential inauguration speech had even begun Reagan's staff already had started working the front rows assuring luminaries such as then Searle President ("Pigheart") Cheney that that pesky aspartame ruling (causes brain cancer, does not everything?) would be reversed as soon as "Big Ron" could be taught to sign (no, NOT PRINT) his name to the orders to the FDA Administrator. No need to wait even until the Administrator could be replaced with someone more "enlightened", or should we say "encumbered" with the famous Cheney signature pallets of crisp new stacks of $100 bills straight from the mint press to the helipad do NOT pass time-consuming bill serial number recording.
Speaking of brain cancer why not FINALLY ALREADY turn our attention back to today and the selfless generosity of ATT and Verizon wireless extended to the "Tea Party" morons and most of all their self-styled brainless leader Senator Ted Cruz, hear the tea spoons clanking around in his empty noggin?). The link below will help fill in those "interested" (or shall we just say "thoroughly nauseated" readers) with fascinating key participation of these well-practiced sleight-of-contract cellphone grifters ATT and Verizon whom we might thank our lucky stars do not get in the automobile sales, leasing and repair business (as far as we know, that is) were we not reasonably confident that they left no stone unturned getting a hand in EVERYONE's pocket except maybe in those countries which do not yet have pockets.
The reported facts are presented in the CREDO cellular service advertisement set out below but are worthy of brief empahsis here. CREDO by the way is the modern-day mobile iteration of Working Assets which was the pioneer in social activism amongst long-distance landline carriers which monthly let its callers make free long-distance telephone calls directly to provided direct-dial numbers of callers representatives in Washington.
The Ninth Amendment log does not take any money or remuneration whatsoever for any commercial interest that we on a unanimous vote of the editorial board believe worth of presenting in the body of a post. We have never spoken or communicated in any way with any such entity when we have made recommendations solely on the basis of our own observations and opinions. Likewise no guarantees, although we try to be sparing with only those recommendations we deem most worthy of mention in hopes that they may raise readers knowledge base and standard of living as better, more broadly informed consumers. The Ninth Amendment does not however exercise any control over advertisements in the borders of this log chosen through an auction process by Google adsense, and on which we give no input. Readers are encouraged as always to do their own research. For allegedly untracked and unrecorded queries on subjects with a secure connection when available the Ninth Amendment frequently does "searches" with qrobe.it (HTTPS) which is so described by Mozilla.org for its Firefox browser as an additional search engine which can be added to the drop-down search box list by going to the term "Manage Search Engines" after which point it remains available on the drop-down list. The link below the CREDO notice contains the terms of the CREDO mobile offer.
Copyright 2014 Big M All World Rights Expressly Reserved (no claim to CREDO material)
| Call 877-346-0516 with special offer code 318145 | Need to unsubscribe? |
 |
 |
 |
|
Senator Ted Cruz is the ringleader of the current government
shutdown—taking millions of Americans hostage in an attempt to thwart
the will of voters in the 2012 election by defunding or delaying
Obamacare. He even sought to thwart the will of his fellow senators by
staging a rambling 21-hour faux-filibuster when he couldn't get enough
colleagues to join a real filibuster.
If the shutdown lasts more than a few weeks, millions of veterans may not get their disability claims or pension payments, and low-income pregnant women and new moms may stop getting the help they need to buy healthy food for their families. And who helped Mr. Cruz go to Washington? Verizon Wireless and AT&T. Both telecom giants contributed thousands of dollars to his 2012 Senate campaign. On top of that, Verizon has contributed $220,600 and AT&T a whopping $1,093,000 since 2009 to members of the House and Senate Tea Party Caucuses, who have pushed Republicans in Congress to hostage-taking extremism. At CREDO, we don't fund radical right politicians like Ted Cruz—we fight them. We fight through our powerhouse network of 3 million activists at CREDO Action. Over the past week, we rallied more than 13,000 of our activists to call Republicans and demand that they vote against the shutdown. And another 9,000 called Democrats, urging them not to cave to outrageous Republican demands. We also donate millions of dollars each year to nonprofit groups working for progressive change. Since 1985, we've raised $75 million for groups like Planned Parenthood, Democracy Now! and 350.org. The more members we have, the harder we can fight back against extremists like Ted Cruz. Join the fight. Make the switch to CREDO Mobile by October 11, and get everything you expect from a mobile phone company—and a whole lot more:*
Call 877-346-0516 and mention special offer code 318145 or join online today. Offer expires October 11, 2013. |
 |
  |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)