Sunday, 23 November 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA - As Texas Indicted Idiot lameduck Governor Rick "Payback" Perry continued to call upon someone anyone and everyone to sue United States President Barack Obama for something anything and everything the Ninth Amendment meanwhile seemingly was prevented by interfering parties or circumstances as described in the Ninth Amendment's recent reply to a reader's inquiry as to upcoming articles on the subject of problems experienced with Google-reported Blogger statistics to a publisher such as the Ninth Amendment's site owner. The Ninth Amendment is committed fully to take whatever measures are necessary to assist in the investigation and corrective action required to insure the best possible presentation possible of the Ninth Amendment site to our readers.
There have been increasingly erratic divergences from what over several years had been this Site's experience with Google's contractually provided ¨accurate up to the minute statistics¨ which figures in the past months repeatedly have proven exponentially less reliable contradictory in their reporting of statistics such as numbers of pageviews depending upon what time period one is examining and then even much more greater discrepancies with Google Analytics.
Just one more in a long list of new irregularities for now being traffic seemingly reaching the site if at all through constantly changing foreign referring URLS and sites rarely seen before. Today for example for some time the highest referring URL/site address was http://goody498.blog27.fc2.com/ with the referral numbers later dropping. In any case however the fact is that it appears to be Japanese blog or journal of some sort with which the Ninth Amendment has no known connection whatsoever. (This is not meant as encouragement to readers to go to that address in any way as the Ninth Amendment has no assurance regarding the integrity of the site nor any information as to why it would been refer readers to the Ninth Amendment.)
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
The Ninth Amendment to the Constitution is the strongest statement therein that powers not expressly granted the State are retained as rights of the People. The State has misconstrued, misrepresented, ignored, and denied the People's rights by elimination of protections reserved alone to them, not recognized by the Supreme Court, the Legislative, and worst the Executive Branch in the illegitimate exercise of draconian powers which unlawfully disparage the inalienable rights of the People.
Showing posts with label publish. Show all posts
Showing posts with label publish. Show all posts
23 November 2014
16 July 2014
Criminal Interference Attempts Against Ninth Amendment Freedoms Of Speech And Press And Readers' Access To Site Resumed By Conspiring Parties' Felony Violations Of Federal And State Statutes
Tuesday, 15 June 2014, SHREVEPORT AND HOUSTON, THE GULF OF COREXIT - The editorial board of the Ninth Amendment once again reluctantly has determined that the time is upon us that we must creep about for a few hours because it is that brief period no longer than an extra-innings professional baseball game after luncheon and before the dinner hour when Texas present and former Governors and Presidents lay down for their nappy-time toddies perhaps occasionally arising from their untroubled slumbers to play another quick round of video golf or practice their penmanship signing all those darn papers that just keep coming no matter how fast they sign them and then check to make sure that all were signed right side up. An honest man must earn his money the honest way or it just does not feel right.*
Fantasy worlds of sweet delusion aside the editorial board of the Ninth Amendment has decided actually at this time that the all too familiar increasing interference with domestic, interstate and international communications between our northern hemisphere headquarters and various technical support and news bureau locations such that one who did not know better might think that our rigorous investigative and reporting impartiality and focus of attention might be compromised by the implied complications inherent in various implicit and more explicit threats really is nothing more than an arguably refreshing opportunity to peruse the statutes for the latest draconian penalties enacted for cybercrimes both mundane and exotic and related newly criminal activities focused on information technology, computers and the Internet that the State has been so busily enacting in the broad sweep of its hysteria that the number of years those who intermittently maintain such an interest in attempting to disrupt and divert this site qualify for achieve a number that eventually becomes higher than we are able easily to count but certainly totals something on the order of several centuries' worth of lifetimes far greater than one person might ever reasonably expect to live.
Then of course for good measure comes the time to throw on the less sexy (as they say in the profession) list of activities which are not cyber anything but nevertheless have been around for centuries since in most cases there also is a laundry list of predicate unlawful acts which one would rather just have skipped altogether but remain altogether necessary nevertheless in many cases just to get to the scene of the crime whether one likes it or not.
And finally as if all that were not enough just to make sure some bad guy (or gal) who is not one of the lucky ones who secretly was slipped their get out of jail free card out of the woodwork come the seemingly non-specific innocuous-sounding but not really so much as one would think charges like conspiracy, aiding and abetting, knowledge before the fact, knowledge after the fact, obstruction of justice, attempted, abandoned (but not in time), and of course always the danger of misidentification, disidentification, robodentification, wrong prisoner, blind witness, jailhouse snitch one never even remembers seeing before, even God forbid a peace officer sworn to uphold the law but who describes you and your actions such that you do not even realize she is testifying under penalty of perjury about you.
is it worth risking all that? Especially when one then will more likely than not be at the mercy of some other sick individual not a true friend but who will hold out, no way will he sell you out for a song. But then on the other hand, maybe for what he finally settled for which was a song and a sandwich. And you have nothing new to say? So maybe they decide not to rat you out either. At least they only have something Well then on a slow day maybe it is time to speak of mandatory sentences, so sad everyone's hands are tied. Oh except come to think of it maybe there was that one person, that one alone who might change the charges just a little bit to manipulate the "mandatory" minimum. If only that dog had not barked, the one that just did not care for steak seasoned with valium.
Well on the other hand someone could have had a handgun for self-defense. Maybe they never really made it to the gun range despite the best intentions. Likewise cleaning and oiling it. Anyway readers can tell where this one is going. Some of us had it happen right down the street. Two bad guys lost their shirts at a poker game so they followed another fellow who had cleaned up at the poker game home and into the house with him and his wife. Only problem was that they were two armed men and he was one in pajamas with his gun in the drawer. But he pulled out the gun beside his wife still sleeping and pandemonium ensued. Later it took the police a while to figure out how who got where.
In any case the domestic gunfighter did get off a shot or two. The only problem was that the one he hit and killed was his wife. As for the other two they had been around the block, avoid ed the "gunfight", they just wanted the money. And sure enough the police did catch the guys which gives us the chance to add one last point to what seemed like such a simple little crime. The poker thief did not have a gun and did not take a shot at anyone. But the husband shot his wife dead during the crime. Because the law can be a strange thing with some little surprises. He was tried and went down for murder.
So there is one last thing to add on to everything else when we try to add up all those years. The guy who had hardly a thing to do with any cybercrime ended up with one last thing about which to worry. Like everything else it seems it has its own name, a special circumstance, although it does not sound so special in a good sort of way.
The editorial board of the Ninth Amendment has seen more than its share of the law. We do not particularly wish it on anyone although in this Country sometimes there is a cost for speaking your voice and writing things that not everyone will wish to hear. We do not do it because we hate our Country nor anyone in it. We do it because we love our Country it has a lot of problems but it is the best one on Earth. We aim to do our part to keep it that way with the clear instructions of the men and women (they could not sign it but we have no doubt where the true decisions were made). People will disagree on how best things are done until there are no people left but one.
But we have the ground rules as straightforward as they can be. Our ancestors made a sacred compact that established the rights and responsibilities among many different people trying to live together in one country, and among the people and the State to which they would lend their power. From their own very painful experience they agreed foremost that with very few exceptions a person, a group of people and a press were free to say as they pleased and others respond as they wished.
As the Ninth Amendment reminded readers before in times when persons disagreed with our words all persons have always been free to respond as they pleased elsewhere or with allowance provided right here for their comments published for all to read for themselves. However it is axiomatic that free speech in no way encompasses interference or attempting interference with another person's right to speak, to assemble and/or to publish what words they will. And finally as to the truth itself one can spend a lifetime trying to change facts, but so far as we are concerned a fact is a fact and the truth is the truth. And the truth cannot be denied nor ignored forever. That is a fact.
* Dick Cheney. Former C.E.O. of Halliburton professional obtainers of U.S. Government contracts too large for competitive bidding , Self-Declared Acting President of U.S. On 11 September 2001 Bunkering In White House "Situation Room", Former President of Blackdeath official mercenaries of U.S. State Department non-competitive overseas contracts for Embassy and Consulate Security and Pakistani Crowd Control, Blackdeath Iraqi Oil Refinery Security, Non-Competitive Iraq Construction Contracts for Substandard U.S. Military Bases, Meals and Airstrips, Model Living Pigheart Transplant Recipient, Chief CIA Fake WMD Project, Cheney Subject Of Texas Monthly 2007 Cover Award For "Buy This Magazine Or Dick Cheney Will Shoot You In The Face"
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Fantasy worlds of sweet delusion aside the editorial board of the Ninth Amendment has decided actually at this time that the all too familiar increasing interference with domestic, interstate and international communications between our northern hemisphere headquarters and various technical support and news bureau locations such that one who did not know better might think that our rigorous investigative and reporting impartiality and focus of attention might be compromised by the implied complications inherent in various implicit and more explicit threats really is nothing more than an arguably refreshing opportunity to peruse the statutes for the latest draconian penalties enacted for cybercrimes both mundane and exotic and related newly criminal activities focused on information technology, computers and the Internet that the State has been so busily enacting in the broad sweep of its hysteria that the number of years those who intermittently maintain such an interest in attempting to disrupt and divert this site qualify for achieve a number that eventually becomes higher than we are able easily to count but certainly totals something on the order of several centuries' worth of lifetimes far greater than one person might ever reasonably expect to live.
Then of course for good measure comes the time to throw on the less sexy (as they say in the profession) list of activities which are not cyber anything but nevertheless have been around for centuries since in most cases there also is a laundry list of predicate unlawful acts which one would rather just have skipped altogether but remain altogether necessary nevertheless in many cases just to get to the scene of the crime whether one likes it or not.
And finally as if all that were not enough just to make sure some bad guy (or gal) who is not one of the lucky ones who secretly was slipped their get out of jail free card out of the woodwork come the seemingly non-specific innocuous-sounding but not really so much as one would think charges like conspiracy, aiding and abetting, knowledge before the fact, knowledge after the fact, obstruction of justice, attempted, abandoned (but not in time), and of course always the danger of misidentification, disidentification, robodentification, wrong prisoner, blind witness, jailhouse snitch one never even remembers seeing before, even God forbid a peace officer sworn to uphold the law but who describes you and your actions such that you do not even realize she is testifying under penalty of perjury about you.
is it worth risking all that? Especially when one then will more likely than not be at the mercy of some other sick individual not a true friend but who will hold out, no way will he sell you out for a song. But then on the other hand, maybe for what he finally settled for which was a song and a sandwich. And you have nothing new to say? So maybe they decide not to rat you out either. At least they only have something Well then on a slow day maybe it is time to speak of mandatory sentences, so sad everyone's hands are tied. Oh except come to think of it maybe there was that one person, that one alone who might change the charges just a little bit to manipulate the "mandatory" minimum. If only that dog had not barked, the one that just did not care for steak seasoned with valium.
Well on the other hand someone could have had a handgun for self-defense. Maybe they never really made it to the gun range despite the best intentions. Likewise cleaning and oiling it. Anyway readers can tell where this one is going. Some of us had it happen right down the street. Two bad guys lost their shirts at a poker game so they followed another fellow who had cleaned up at the poker game home and into the house with him and his wife. Only problem was that they were two armed men and he was one in pajamas with his gun in the drawer. But he pulled out the gun beside his wife still sleeping and pandemonium ensued. Later it took the police a while to figure out how who got where.
In any case the domestic gunfighter did get off a shot or two. The only problem was that the one he hit and killed was his wife. As for the other two they had been around the block, avoid ed the "gunfight", they just wanted the money. And sure enough the police did catch the guys which gives us the chance to add one last point to what seemed like such a simple little crime. The poker thief did not have a gun and did not take a shot at anyone. But the husband shot his wife dead during the crime. Because the law can be a strange thing with some little surprises. He was tried and went down for murder.
So there is one last thing to add on to everything else when we try to add up all those years. The guy who had hardly a thing to do with any cybercrime ended up with one last thing about which to worry. Like everything else it seems it has its own name, a special circumstance, although it does not sound so special in a good sort of way.
The editorial board of the Ninth Amendment has seen more than its share of the law. We do not particularly wish it on anyone although in this Country sometimes there is a cost for speaking your voice and writing things that not everyone will wish to hear. We do not do it because we hate our Country nor anyone in it. We do it because we love our Country it has a lot of problems but it is the best one on Earth. We aim to do our part to keep it that way with the clear instructions of the men and women (they could not sign it but we have no doubt where the true decisions were made). People will disagree on how best things are done until there are no people left but one.
But we have the ground rules as straightforward as they can be. Our ancestors made a sacred compact that established the rights and responsibilities among many different people trying to live together in one country, and among the people and the State to which they would lend their power. From their own very painful experience they agreed foremost that with very few exceptions a person, a group of people and a press were free to say as they pleased and others respond as they wished.
As the Ninth Amendment reminded readers before in times when persons disagreed with our words all persons have always been free to respond as they pleased elsewhere or with allowance provided right here for their comments published for all to read for themselves. However it is axiomatic that free speech in no way encompasses interference or attempting interference with another person's right to speak, to assemble and/or to publish what words they will. And finally as to the truth itself one can spend a lifetime trying to change facts, but so far as we are concerned a fact is a fact and the truth is the truth. And the truth cannot be denied nor ignored forever. That is a fact.
* Dick Cheney. Former C.E.O. of Halliburton professional obtainers of U.S. Government contracts too large for competitive bidding , Self-Declared Acting President of U.S. On 11 September 2001 Bunkering In White House "Situation Room", Former President of Blackdeath official mercenaries of U.S. State Department non-competitive overseas contracts for Embassy and Consulate Security and Pakistani Crowd Control, Blackdeath Iraqi Oil Refinery Security, Non-Competitive Iraq Construction Contracts for Substandard U.S. Military Bases, Meals and Airstrips, Model Living Pigheart Transplant Recipient, Chief CIA Fake WMD Project, Cheney Subject Of Texas Monthly 2007 Cover Award For "Buy This Magazine Or Dick Cheney Will Shoot You In The Face"
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
12 July 2014
George Clooney Continues To Slam Trash English Tabloid The Daily Mail Online Mail New York Times Article Reports - Times Digital Publishes Ninth Amendment Editorial Board Comment
Saturday, 12 June 2014, NEW YORK, NEW YORK - The New York Times edition today reported in the article linked below that the normally publicly reserved George Clooney remains unmollified by what he apparently regards as insufficiently half-hearted insincere efforts of the English trash tabloid The Daily Mail's Web Publication Mail Online to worm its way out of an incendiary article it published making untruthful assertions including about Mr. Clooney's Lebanese fiancee and her family's relationship with him which seemingly have incensed Mr. Clooney.
The tabloid already has acknowledged its online piece was factually incorrect and withdrew it within hours of Mr. Clooney's publication of his first response in USA Today reportedly hammering the tabloid for what Mr. Clooney claims to have been its extreme recklessness in publishing a piece which could expose his fiancee and/or her mother and their far-flung families potentially to serious danger in a world which already presents more than enough real dangers.
Preceding the link below directly to the Times article concerning Mr. Clooney's continuing apparent outrage at The Daily Mail's Web Publication Mail Online while that tabloid's Web Publication has continued to enjoy a surge of readership in its expansion into the United States' market is a comment submitted to the Times on behalf of the Ninth Amendment editorial board in response to the Times article which Ninth Amendment comment is here below reproduced verbatim (with one spelling error corrected) having been just hours ago published in today's same digital edition of the Times along with other comments directly responding to the Times article.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved (no claim as to Times material)
The tabloid already has acknowledged its online piece was factually incorrect and withdrew it within hours of Mr. Clooney's publication of his first response in USA Today reportedly hammering the tabloid for what Mr. Clooney claims to have been its extreme recklessness in publishing a piece which could expose his fiancee and/or her mother and their far-flung families potentially to serious danger in a world which already presents more than enough real dangers.
Preceding the link below directly to the Times article concerning Mr. Clooney's continuing apparent outrage at The Daily Mail's Web Publication Mail Online while that tabloid's Web Publication has continued to enjoy a surge of readership in its expansion into the United States' market is a comment submitted to the Times on behalf of the Ninth Amendment editorial board in response to the Times article which Ninth Amendment comment is here below reproduced verbatim (with one spelling error corrected) having been just hours ago published in today's same digital edition of the Times along with other comments directly responding to the Times article.
BigMartin
waronnothing 1 hour ago
The editorial board of the Ninth Amendment at www.waronnothing.blogspot.com expresses its full sympathy and support for Mr. Clooney, his fiancee, and all their families and loved ones. Mr. Clooney both in his life on and off the set is a living example of the very finest qualities of decorum and compassion far beyond what we ourselves could ever hope to achieve in our lifetimes. We are completely unfamiliar with the offending "tabloid" which would by all accounts seem to aspire to all the very worst qualities antithetical to what Mr. Clooney and his work both professional and humanitarian represents to all of us as the very finest example of the highest qualities which persons of every race might only aspire to achieve. Should the offending "tabloid" purport to hold itself out as a "news" organization given the most copious resources reported to be at its disposal might we suggest, including in recognition of and in respect for the scores of journalists who have given their lives in the field in just the past year to report the news, that it follow the example of news organizations such as CNN, the New York Times, le Monde and so many others and get some of its people off the streets of SoHo and Los Angeles and out there to the front lines of the Middle East and perhaps eastern Ukraine, for starters. These are serious times which is all the less excuse for spurious and infantile behavior by those who would hold themselves out to be members of the noblest of professions
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/12/business/media/heard-the-news-on-george-clooney-this-much-is-true-hes-livid.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=HpSumSmallMediaHigh&module=second-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved (no claim as to Times material)
13 June 2014
Google Blogger Fails To Report Reliable Accurate Site Statistics Nor Effectively Address Site Pageview Interference And/Or Reports Exposing Vulnerabilities Of Publishers' and Advertisers' Privacy
Friday, 13 June 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA - Despite many recent and increasing requests by the editorial board of the Ninth Amendment log Google has declined to comment and/or provide information on why this New American log's site pageview statistics have in recent weeks steadily declined either in accuracy and/or to identify whether site viewership now is suffering interference and/or denial of access as the result of the misconduct of other parties or that in which Google is complicit, has knowledge of, and/or lacks the ability to remedy.
Statistics which have appeared to be reliable as suggested by consistency with historical site performance now increasingly are being reported as totally inconsistent for periods lasting as long periods approaching on half a day suggesting Google can no longer maintain the performance standards Google originally established in order to attract publishers and advertisers to its highly lucrative Blogger and Blogger-related endeavors including Google's expansion into the extremely data brokering area of "social media" information collection and sharing particularly through its innocuously named "plus" feature.
As reported by Google itself this information is not only available to its CIA partner but through its "hub" and other "features" for purposes of exchanging it with other popular social media sites with an obviously extremely aggressive emphasis on its "plus" feature to which Google has gone to great lengths to draw in existing publishers who currently do not participate nor wish to participate in this personal information collection vehicle.
Publishers and advertisers wishing to publish and/or advertise on blogs or other popularly accessible web page creation and maintenance outlets will readily find that there now are a great many other entities available providing similar or better services at little or no cost including those based in other countries including those of the European Union which have demonstrated as documented in earlier posts on this New American site significantly greater respect for and legal protections for individuals' privacy regardless of the individuals' home countries.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Statistics which have appeared to be reliable as suggested by consistency with historical site performance now increasingly are being reported as totally inconsistent for periods lasting as long periods approaching on half a day suggesting Google can no longer maintain the performance standards Google originally established in order to attract publishers and advertisers to its highly lucrative Blogger and Blogger-related endeavors including Google's expansion into the extremely data brokering area of "social media" information collection and sharing particularly through its innocuously named "plus" feature.
As reported by Google itself this information is not only available to its CIA partner but through its "hub" and other "features" for purposes of exchanging it with other popular social media sites with an obviously extremely aggressive emphasis on its "plus" feature to which Google has gone to great lengths to draw in existing publishers who currently do not participate nor wish to participate in this personal information collection vehicle.
Publishers and advertisers wishing to publish and/or advertise on blogs or other popularly accessible web page creation and maintenance outlets will readily find that there now are a great many other entities available providing similar or better services at little or no cost including those based in other countries including those of the European Union which have demonstrated as documented in earlier posts on this New American site significantly greater respect for and legal protections for individuals' privacy regardless of the individuals' home countries.
Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)