Freaky Ted Cruz Slammed By New York Times Entire Editorial Board As "Weird" In Self-Contradictory "Imagine" Speech Divorced From "Reality"

       Tuesday, 24 March 2015, Lynchburg, VA -The potentially dangerous to all Tea Party Freak Texas U.S. Senator Ted "Stonehead" Cruz yesterday announced his early entrance into the 2016 Presidential race giving what the New York Times entire editorial board described as a self-contradictory speech divorced from "reality" to a carefully chosen but nevertheless forced-to-attend unenthusiastic crowd many wearing "Rand Paul" t-shirts at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia. The Times pointed out that Cruz while repeatedly invoking the word "imagine" to the extent that it seemed a refrain from the John Lennon song of the same name that it in fact could not be more divergent as among other things Cruz himself and his father both immigrants nevertheless called for the ridiculously impossible "sealing" of the Nation's borders.
       Other than that the speech was so much at odds with itself as well as Freak Cruz' record the major accomplishment of which appears to have been to cost the United States an estimated $24 billion being the "brains" behind the disastrous 2013 federal government shutdown that the Times concluded the most accurate description of Freak Ted Cruz was that he was "weird". As previously emphasized by the Ninth Amendment although the fanatical Cruz is doubtless among the top tier of freaks the Republican Party has produced his past strongly suggests that the extreme Cruz may be "dangerous" weird. As arguably the Tea Party cult's leading voice it was perhaps fitting that the fanatical freak Cruz' speech was as muddled as his cult's thinking decipherable perhaps the Times suggested only to Fox "News" (and also broadcast by law on C-Span).
       Interested readers will find further information in the New York Times article linked to below.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/24/opinion/imagine-president-ted-cruz.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region&region=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region&_r=0

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

Americans' ACA Health, Welfare and Very Lives in Hands of Single Supreme Court Justice Kennedy? And He Smiles Like a Fool As He Figures Out What "Liberty" Means

       Saturday, 31 March 2012, WASHINGTON, D.C. - Readers routinely reminded not to READ FREE UNLIMITED NEW YORK TIMES' DIGITAL CONTENT SIMPLY BY SETTING FREE FIREFOX BROWSERS TO "PRIVATE BROWSING" by later that year on April Fool's Day that is tomorrow in fact the Times already fired at least one executive over the "gold-plated" tens of million dollar porous "paywall" when it if anyone should have known that for a few million dollars of $100 bills lowered on pallets from helicopters the Times simply could have called Dick "Pig Heart" Cheney on the scrambled Batphone and had his "Blackdeath" boys go door to door to crack some heads and get the message out.
       Speaking of April fools the Ninth Amendment moves on to the Justices haunting the once-hallowed halls of the Supreme Court where now Mr. Justice Thomas must be patted down for pornography or self-pleasure devices before entering the men's rooms out in the public area of the Court. Not to mention his lifetime bar from the women's rooms just like his Republican-expected extremely long lifetime appointment to the bench which he is giving up nohow since no one can make him do any work, and he hears from up there on the bench when he can understand what they are saying down there that it may be kind of hard to get another job in America these days.
       In stark contrast Justice Antonin "Broccoli" Scalia sliding his words and the underclass unfortunate enough to slide legs apart down his razor sharp mind that shared an epiphany long ago that life/death/law it is all just economics. Sure does miss those pals of a similar bent from the University of Chicago school and the Seventh Circuit up there. Too bad Bork could not make the cut in 1987 simply because in his case as well it is not necessary to turn to the opinion to know the result, just the parties and/or the causes. Legal realism, economic style. If you have not got the bucks your "justice" decision on the case is a foregone conclusion. As is Mr. Justice Scalia's here with this what who cares Act rich people can pay for their doctors so how dare the Government tell them how to spend their money and the poor already have emergency rooms dammit.
     The Ninth Amendment previously posted its prediction that the Court just because it found it essentially could ignore the United States Constitution (and that sure turned out to be a stellar idea) and in a day position a man for President  who was not even elected, never to cite THAT decision again, now could take on this one too where the American people already clearly have spoken and having done so may not be so tolerant once again this time to have their and their families and loved ones health, welfare, and lifespans profoundly affected by nine spooks in black robes hiding up behind a bench that really is not that high. We could and did reach right over it as children just to bang the Chief's gavel.

Ninth Amendment Comment Published in Digital New York Times Regarding Mr. Justice Kennedy

1.             (Verbatim with one editorial correction "menal" to "mental")

   • BigMartin
   • waronnothing

   Intellectually stimulating as it may or may not be to focus on the alleged jurisprudence of Mr. Justice Kennedy's apparent fascination with the concept of "liberty" (yes such as allows us to carry firearms in schoolzones) given the occasion of this most momentous week in this Court's history as it publicly considers the constitutionality of the ACA, perhaps we might just consider the shameful reality of the "Greatest Nation on Earth" not even providing basic healthcare for all. The Ninth Amendment log at www.waronnothing.blogspot.com observes that in the Federal Government every government worker gets health insurance from a list of about 100 plans which either play ball and provide reasonable healthcare or simply do not get to be on the list. We assume the Justices have at least similar benefits in addition to special attention wherever when needed. (If Mr. Justice Thomas is unwilling to use his provided mental healthcare but instead sit on the bench for decades manifesting some kind of semi-catatonic stupor, no doubt Mr. Justice Kennedy could find him at "liberty" to do so unless and until Thomas is removed under pertinent provisions of the US Constitution). So assuming the Justices are well aware of this excellent system already in place for millions, why agonize reinventing the wheel over the distracting din of obscenely well-financed biased filthy rich opponents who obviously care of nothing but their bottom line while Americans continue to suffer and die for no reason?

   • March 30, 2012 at 4:33 p.m.
   • Reply
   • Recommend5
   • 
     
   • Copyright 2012 Big M and Little L All World Rights Expressly Reserved