Showing posts with label ssci. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ssci. Show all posts

16 May 2015

UPDATED REPUBLICATION: U.S. Torturers Can Be Prosecuted For The Rest Of Their Lives U.S. And Abroad Including International Criminal Court Analysts Agree As Obama DOJ So Far Fails To Prosecute Under Sham "Legal Memos"

     16 May 2015, WASHINGTON, D.C. - [ REPUBLICATION UPDATE] Not-really-elected Bush-Cheney administration and top C.I..A.officials along with C.I.A. torturers exposed in the U.S. Senate Torture Report in December 2014 committing war crimes against humanity have faced no known domestic prosecutions whatsoever for these actions as of 16 May 2015 a full five months after the Senate Torture Report summary's release.
     This absolute lack of criminal prosecution is consistent with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) legally, morally and ethically bankrupt stated position (not legally binding) that it will not prosecute American torturers at its discretion based on what are known to be totally bogus crank legal justifications with DOJ therefore selectively enforcing U.S. laws even while intentionally ignoring what may well include grave capital offenses subject however to no statute of limitations. Readers interested in more information on this can go to the the first link below to an article from earlier this year.
     Analysts however remain in agreement that even given and regardless of the Barack Obama administration's expressed unwillingness to enforce enormously significant U.S. laws against heinous crimes against humanity including those applicable under international signatory treaties that the American torturers known at the least directly to encompass Bush-Cheney administration and then top CIA officials as well as those under their command and responsibility directly committing torturous war crimes against humanity still also can be prosecuted in various international forums including but not limited to the International Criminal Court at any time for the remainder of their lives. Readers interested in more information on this can go to the second link below to another article from the New York Times published earlier this year.
   
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/10/1350790/-Justice-Department-says-it-still-won-t-pursue-criminal-charges-over-American-torture-program#

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/11/us/politics/americans-involved-in-torture-can-be-prosecuted-abroad-analysts-say.html&assetType=nyt_now?gwh=8F182291CC1EDECC273E455BF8F2498F&gwt=pay&assetType=nyt_now

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

31 January 2015

Ninth Amendment Suffers Interference And Reported Pageviews Plummet Since Reporting CIA And Bush Administratioon Officials Going Unpunished For Torture Crimes Against Humanity After Past Month "Visit" To Ninth Amendment By Apparent CIA "Front" Firm Alleged Service Provider Network Barrett Woodyard & Associates

       Saturday, 31 January 2015, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA -  The editorial board of the Ninth Amendment seeks the help of all well-intentioned readers who believe in the vital necessity of the right to free speech and the press as embodied in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as indispensable to a free and open society unintimidated by the State and as far more essential to that freedom than readers' immediate agreement or disagreement with the Ninth Amendment's apparent view or tone in the publishing of any particular post which it has the undeniable right and indeed in our belief duty to publish.      
       Namely the Ninth Amendment makes the unprecedented request in all seriousness that all individuals of good intention who read this post bear witness to the following not only to help protect these vital American liberties but to protect the continued vitality and well-being of the Ninth Amendment as symbolic of all free speech of individuals and of the press in any form including "blogs" to demonstrate and reinforce that no person or publication will not be cowed from exercising their free expression but in fact will be empowered by attempted acts against their well-being which will only serve to strengthen them and their readership and collectively serve to protect all from future Government encroachments or of those of other private parties who may seek unlawfully to silence them.
        Specifically after studying Google reported performance statistics and Google Analytics apparent underlying site-specific information as to entities impacting site readership in all its aspects the Ninth Amendment has concluded after considering all other apparent reasonable possibilities that the Ninth Amendment in the past month has suffered a steep decline in reported pageviews accompanied by bizarrely near impossible other Google reported performance statistics barring some gross outside manipulation.
       These historically unprecedented irregularities for this site which has been published on Google Blogger consistently without any fundamental such drastic change for about the past eight years moreover apparently coincide with two distinct events. One "originates" with the Ninth Amendment itself which for a period of a couple weeks more than the past month has reported significantly more posts on the recently released facts of the CIA Detention and Torture Program at Guantanamo Bay as well as various identified "Black Sites" in foreign countries as partially detailed in the Torture Report released 9 December 2014 by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) as well as the near-universally agreed culpability of and therefore necessary but so far neglected prosecution of senior Bush Administration as well as CIA officials for commission of acts of torture under existing United States law as well as for crimes against humanity under signatory International Treaties and Human Rights Conventions including requiring a statement of compliance by the Obama Administration before the United Nations Committee on Torture. 
       The second appears to be related to a one-time site visit on 30 December 2014 captured by Google Analytics of a reported service provider network of the reported name Barrett Woodyard & Associates reportedly of Malibu, California lasting a reported four minutes and sixteen seconds (4:16) and visiting a reported ten (10) pages of the Ninth Amendment. Since the approximate date of that visit the Google reported overall Ninth Amendment pageviews and particularly those relating to Bush Administration and CIA officials past and present torture and human rights abuses without explanation have plummeted relative to all historical site experience. What greatly reduced pageviews have been reported are of unlikely pageviews of posts years past often originating reportedly from countries rarely or never before having had readers of the Ninth Amendment but as stated above strangely reportedly nevertheless emanate from a very small number of reported browsers and operating systems suggesting obvious manipulation and coordination.
       First let us take a look at the more or less outstanding performance in the latter months of 2014 of the Ninth Amendment relative to its own prior performance approximately up to the time of its postings concerning and leading up to the weeks before the public disclosure of the SSCI Torture Report up to and after which time a significant number of Ninth Amendment posts have focused on the Bush Administration and CIA Officials' conspiracy to conduct its illegal detention and torture program and its attempted interference with investigation of and disclosure of the true facts of that program right up to the present. Exhibit "A" below.

Graph of Blogger page views
                                                       Exhibit "A"                        
   
       Next let us observe the search information available on the reported service provider network Barrett Woodyard & Associates reportedly of Malibu, California "visiting" the Ninth Amendment for a single time as reported by Google Analytics on 30 November 2015 for a reported period of four minutes and sixteen seconds (4:16) visiting a reported 10 pages of the Ninth Amendment. When we run the search on one of our preferred search engines Privatlee for the following specific search "barrett woodyard & associates" which we encourage readers to do for themselves. As can be observed in Exhibit "A" above the Ninth Amendment pageviews have plummeted from more or less exactly that time.
       Now here is the result of the Privatlee search "barrett woodward & associates" "central intelligence agency" which readers were asked directly above to perform as is presented here as Exhibit "B":

Web Images



Results 1 - 13 of about 13

  1. 7x24 Exchange Member Companies




    Barnett Consulting Engineers, Inc. Barrett Woodyard & Associates Baskervill ... Cellwatch Central Intelligence Agency Centris CFR Engineering Consultants
  2. mris.com |




    Online real estate information service for real estate professionals in MD, DC, Northern VA, and parts of WV and PA. Profile, news and membership information.
  3. 2014 Design Forecast - Gensler




    Barrack, Rodos & Bacine. Barrett, Woodyard & Associates, Inc. Base Management .... Central Intelligence Agency. Central Shoe Repair, Inc. Centrum Partners.
  4. Lead411 Company Directory: Emails, Addresses, Business




    Lead411's Company profiles including all companies from A to Z. ... Company/Phone: CEO/Industry: Email / Co Size: City / IT Technologies: Schneider National Inc
  5. Annual Report 2008-2009 - University Career Center




    US Central Intelligence Agency. 1. 4. Vanguard. 1. 20. Wachovia. 1. 12. Totals ...... Barrett Woodyard & Associates. Rabinowitz, Brad. BASF Corporation. Dillon ...
  6. Directory - InsideView - Market Intelligence for Sales and ...




    • Get real-time intelligence • Increase your productivity • Never miss an opportunity
  7. CONTRIBUTIONS FOR ROMNEY FOR PRESIDENT, INC.



    Server Location

    BARRETT WOODYARD & ASSOCIATES, 500.00. BARRICK GOLDSTRIKE MINES ...... CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, 250.00. CENTRAL INVESTMENTS ...
                                                             Exhibit "B"

       The Ninth Amendment does not here attempt to delve further into the implications of some of the search results found at this time but does wish to preserve a record and encourages interested readers to do so. Readers however are asked please to well note and bear witness to the coincidence in every case of the two search terms in each result one of which reportedly is a "network service provider" which reportedly visited the Ninth Amendment just around the time of its reported dive in pageviews particularly of recent posts which as it turns out largely concern the second search term.
       Although the page copied from the Privatlee search and sought to be pasted here as Exhibit "B" did not paste in its entirety readers who have performed or do perform the Privatlee search themselves should unless it has been altered find a most curious search return which for unknown reasons is omitted here. In that search return the Central Intelligence Agency appears to be making a $250.00 donation to the Mitt Romney presidential election campaign as duly noted by the FEC. However for the time-being the Ninth Amendment wishes to stay on point focused on the commonality between the two entities whose co-appearance in search results is inescapable. 
       Meanwhile readers should further be aware and bear witness to the fact that after repeatedly requesting corrective action from Google nearly daily along with transmitted specific screenshots of site performance statistics the Ninth Amendment has received absolutely no communication nor any other apparent action from Google in response to its requests. 
       These screenshots repeatedly have shown Google in the limited number of pageviews Google has reported that many are from obscure countries never before seen by the Ninth Amendment in results which reportedly contrary to all prior experience are for old posts with almost none for the newer posts which unsurprisingly encompass the focus on the misdeeds and culpability of the Bush Administration and past and present CIA officials. Meanwhile additionally even though the pageviews reportedly originate from a hodgepodge of most unlikely countries other reported statistics show Google that these obscure countries at far different points on the globe are using the exact same operating systems and browsers.
       The performance statistics the Ninth Amendment has seen in the past month have gone from the virtually statistically impossible to the utterly absurd although the attempted ultimate result of these disruptions in reporting of statistics which unfortunately have extended some readers report to the interference or disruption of their access to Ninth Amendment posts are anything but an absurd joke as they appear to be a dead serious effort to stifle one more American voice which is that of the Ninth Amendment.
       In conclusion the editorial board of the Ninth Amendment makes the unprecedented request of readers that they bear witness to all that is set out in this post and do not forget it. That is the best hope for preserving the Ninth Amendment's and all Americans' freedom of speech and the press essential to a free society under the United States Constitution. Rather than stifling speech ideally it will strengthen it as we ask all readers sufficiently concerned who have not read posts in the past month or slightly more if at anytime please to peruse them now if possible.
       If there are those who would seek to interfere or discourage the writing and/or reading of those posts that is most likely where readers will find exactly what it is they keep out of the public eye and thus avoid public clamor that justice be done by the Obama Administration. Please do not let them succeed. Should readers of the Ninth Amendment suffer any interference the Ninth Amendment editorial board believes the best remedy is that all contact their internet service provider, Google and news media contacts directly. The editorial board as always expresses its gratitude to all readers and visitors to this site of good intention and in this case especially those who have persevered to the end of this post.

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved 

19 January 2015

UPDATED: American Torturers Can Be Prosecuted Abroad Including By International Criminal Court Analysts Agree While DOJ Refuses To Prosecute

       19 January 2015, WASHINGTON, D.C. - In Memory of Martin Luther King, Jr. on this day devoted to his remembrance. This post has been substantially updated with the following:

16 May 2015, WASHINGTON, D.C. - [ REPUBLICATION UPDATE] Not-really-elected Bush-Cheney administration and top C.I..A.officials along with C.I.A. torturers exposed in the U.S. Senate Torture Report in December 2014 committing war crimes against humanity have faced no known domestic prosecutions whatsoever for these actions as of 16 May 2015 a full five months after the Senate Torture Report summary's release.
     This absolute lack of criminal prosecution is consistent with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) legally, morally and ethically untenable stated position (not legally binding) that it will not prosecute American torturers at its discretion based on what are known to be totally bogus crank legal justifications with DOJ therefore selectively enforcing U.S. laws even while intentionally ignoring what may well include grave capital offenses subject to no statute of limitations. Readers interested in more information on this can go to the the first link below to an article from earlier this year.
     Analysts however remain in agreement that even given and regardless of the Barack Obama administration's expressed unwillingness to enforce enormously significant U.S. laws against heinous crimes against humanity including those applicable under international signatory treaties that the American torturers known at the least directly to encompass Bush-Cheney administration and then top CIA officials as well as those under their command and responsibility directly committing torturous war crimes against humanity all for the remainder of their lives still also can be prosecuted in various international forums including but not limited to the International Criminal Court.  Readers interested in more information on this can go to the second link below to another article from the New York Times published earlier this year.
 
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/10/1350790/-Justice-Department-says-it-still-won-t-pursue-criminal-charges-over-American-torture-program#

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/11/us/politics/americans-involved-in-torture-can-be-prosecuted-abroad-analysts-say.html&assetType=nyt_now?gwh=8F182291CC1EDECC273E455BF8F2498F&gwt=pay&assetType=nyt_now

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

George Bush (43), Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld And Their Hack Lawyers Alberto Gonzales, David Addington, William Haynes, Jay Bybee And John Yoo Found Guilty Of War Crimes By Malaysian International War Crimes Tribunal

       Monday, 19 January 2015, KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA - A Malaysian International War Crimes Tribunal comprised of a five senior judge panel (the "Tribunal") consistent with the Nuremberg Charter which reportedly scrupulously adhered to the regulations of the Nuremberg courts and the International Criminal Courts in 2012 tried in abstenia not-really-elected "President" George W. Bush, Vice-President "Pigheart" Dick "Criminal Notorious" Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld (former Nixon appointee, anti-FOIA fanatic, recruiter of Cheney as federal official, bribed by G.D. Searle to get aspartame approved despite FDA finding unacceptable risk of brain cancer, resigned in disgrace in 2006 after engineering illegal U.S. failed Afghanistan and Iraq quagmires, wrote autobiography detailing steps guaranteed to get one into hell) as well as their hack lawyers Alberto Gonzales (Bush personal lawyer who wrote legal opinion okaying obviously unconstitutional NSA "Operation PRISM" dragnet domestic spying of all U.S. citizens only copy of which then was kept in his office safe so no one could see his hack "legal analysis"), David Addington, William Haynes, Jay Bybee and John Yoo all of whom the Tribunal found guilty as war criminals for torture and inhumane, cruel and degrading treatment.
       According to the below linked Foreign Policy Journal (the "Journal") article:
The prosecution case rested on proving how the decision-makers at the highest level President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld, aided and abetted by the lawyers and the other commanders and CIA officials – all acted in concert. Torture was systematically applied and became an accepted norm.
According to the prosecution, the testimony of all the witnesses exposed a sustained perpetration of brutal, barbaric, cruel and dehumanising course of conduct against them.
These acts of crimes were applied cumulatively to inflict the worst possible pain and suffering, said lawyers.The prosecution case rested on proving how the decision-makers at the highest level President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld, aided and abetted by the lawyers and the other commanders and CIA officials – all acted in concert. Torture was systematically applied and became an accepted norm.
The president of the tribunal Tan Sri Dato Lamin bin Haji Mohd Yunus Lamin, found that the prosecution had established beyond a “reasonable doubt that the accused persons, former President George Bush and his co-conspirators engaged in a web of instructions, memos, directives, legal advice and action that established a common plan and purpose, joint enterprise and/or conspiracy to commit the crimes of Torture and War Crimes, including and not limited to a common plan and purpose to commit the following crimes in relation to the “War on Terror” and the wars launched by the U.S. and others in Afghanistan and Iraq.”
 The Journal reported that testimony included that of Iraqi and British citizens from whom:
 The court heard how 
  • Abbas Abid, a 48-year-old engineer from Fallujah in Iraq had his fingernails removed by pliers.
  • Ali Shalal was attached with bare electrical wires and electrocuted and hung from a wall.
  • Moazzam Begg was beaten, hooded and put in solitary confinement.
  • Jameelah was stripped and humiliated, and was used as a human shield whilst being transported by helicopter.
The witnesses also detailed how they have residual injuries till today.
Finally the Journal reported that upon the Tribunal's handing down of a unanimous guilty verdict finding Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzaler, Addington, Haynes, Bybee and Yoo to be war criminals the Tribunal stated that although it had no custodial authority of the war criminals that:
What we can do, under Article 31 of Chapter VI of Part 2 of the Charter is to recommend to the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission to submit this finding of conviction by the Tribunal, together with a record of these proceedings, to the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, as well as the United Nations and the Security Council. 
The Tribunal also recommends to the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission that the names of all the 8 convicted persons be entered and included in the Commission’s Register of War Criminals and be publicised accordingly.
       The Journal reported that there may be some countries that these convicted war criminals have avoided and others that may have interfered with their prosecution despite the "duty" of all countries to prosecute convicted war criminals under the doctrine of "universal jurisdiction" established with the conviction of fellow war criminal former Chilean dictator Augustine Pinochet who was arrested in Britain and turned over to Spain for prosecution for his commission of war crimes.
       The Ninth Amendment at this time does not yet have information what actions if any the International Criminal Court as well as the United Nations and the Security Council may have initiated or plan against convicted war criminals Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, Addington, Haynes, Bybee and Yoo or "other commanders and CIA officials" not charged here but identified by the Tribunal as having been engaged in the same torture and war crimes conspiracy.
       Although it is evident that to date no torture and war crimes or other criminal actions have yet been referred by the Obama White House to the Department of Justice ("DOJ") nor any international tribunal for prosecution DOJ previously having defended itself by saying that the CIA sought a legal opinion as to its commission of acts of torture and detainment and confinement which the DOJ dutifully cleared by "legal analysis" but since has claimed the CIA lied to DOJ about the extent of its actions in seeking the opinion. Similarly the Bush White House which as the head of the executive branch was responsible for all actions of the CIA which is an executive branch agency claimed that the CIA lied to it about the extent of its commission of war crimes and torture.
       CIA officials claim that although the CIA did not mismanage its war crimes and torture program it was unaware of the extent of the activities of its operatives and contractors. One unidentified CIA employee however was sent home early after he was found to have "anger management and control issues" after he threatened a "detainee" with a pistol and electric drill and forced the "detainee" to play Russian Roulette with him although the employee subsequently faced no punishment or discipline from the CIA.
       The Senate Select Committee On Intelligence (SSCI) Bush CIA Torture Report released a 524 page redacted executive summary of the otherwise classified 6,000 page Torture Report which concludes that CIA officials did and have continued to lie repeatedly to the United States Congress about its actions. The former chair of the SSCI Senator Dianne Feinstein in an extraordinary forty-five (45) minute speech on the Senate floor detailed how the CIA and delayed and obstructed the SSCI from fulfilling its oversight duties of the CIA.
       This included the CIA referring apparently bogus charges with DOJ against Senate staffers of the SSCI from somehow hacking into CIA computers although the CIA computers were completely segregated including at a different physical location from those used by the staffers. The SSCI concluded that this most likely was an attempt by the CIA to "intimidate" SSCI staffers while actually it was determined and later admitted by the CIA that it at this time was hacking into Senate computers allegedly to conduct an investigation of its own legislative branch overseers.
       The main impetus for this more recent flurry of activities by the CIA apparently was its alarm over having released to the SSCI staffers probably either by mistake or a whistleblower a document come to be known as the "Panetta Report" so-called because it was prepared under the direction of former CIA Director Leon Panetta and which apparently definitively proves that the CIA not only misled Congress but actually knew it was doing so and therefore CIA officials were in fact lying under oath to Congress. Members of the SSCI have reviewed the Panetta report and have since not released it but kept it secured in a safe in a Senate office building.
       The CIA has continued to complain that the report was stolen by SSCI staffers. The CIA also has attempted to assert numerous non-existent privileges as to the "Panetta Report" and other documents apparently accidentally released relating to the allegedly partially "draft" status of the "Panetta Report" as well as other privileges familiar to federal prosecutors such as ones apparently derived from the "deliberative process" privilege and others seemingly akin to the "work product" or "attorney-client" privilege none of which privileges Senator Feinstein pointed out are recognized by the Senate.


http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2012/05/12/bush-convicted-of-war-crimes-in-absentia/

Copyright 2005 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved