Tuesday, 15 June 2015, LONDON - A coordinated ridiculously obvious effort of various British "security services" and the Home Office in a transparent attempt to terrorize the British people into giving up even more of their civil rights anytime now by means of a coordinated attack of vague completely unsubstantiated doomsday innuendo based on neither any current nor proven incident at all casting the handily "notorious" (to all except most normal persons on the street worldwide) N.S.A. mass surveillance whistle-blower Edward J. Snowden as fall guy followed a blatantly manipulative press "leak" dutifully regurgitated by the Sunday Times. Its hyperbolic blather reproduced here below until cut off alas for our not having a subscription to that newspaper but not before the article belied its own total lack of any factual foundation bereft of evidence of official substantiated reason for concern for any harm to anyone at all.
The handy but nevertheless true genius of the narrative device of the further vilification of Snowden served well for Cameron officials to express their outrage at little personal risk and as well as provide an enjoyable laughable complement to the opening of this past Sunday's "exclusively" leaked front page article to cast Snowden as some kind of beastly monster who seemingly long has been on intimate terms (and actually in the Sunday Times appears in effectively superimposed photos coyly to be avoiding a kiss on the lips or peck on the cheek from "call me Vlad" Putin) with his globetrotting now dearest of exile hosts Russian President Vladimir Putin no doubt met long ago and known by Snowden and his dog on the streets of Fort Meade, Maryland as Putin of course is known worldwide to be permitted freely to roam the United States shirtless and bareback on his horse befriending Americans young and old alike except in communities where horses are prohibited on public byways or shirts are required in public.
Following the ghastly news in the "leak" was an ardently repetitive seemingly specific but at the same time factually void mostly identical pair of reasons fed to the selected press with great drama in which government officials to differing degrees intimated or outright lied that the Russian and Chinese were known (not true) to have decrytped documents they had obtained (well, were suspected of obtaining) but known definitively not to contain either names nor identifying information of British spies which documents only had been released to a very select few members of the most highly regarded conscientious members of the U.S. and British press by the "villain" Snowden who had "blood on his hands" and further was called by one official a "traitor" (although apparently not to Great Britain which is not known to have granted him citizenship) and so on which indeterminate event had within the past two years or whenever caused such a serious British security breach that some secret agents had actually been "moved" as in from one place to another.
This apparently was such a traumatic experience and unfamiliar experience to them that being in a new place without the same contacts and personal support groups and so on that they were intimated to have been at a complete loss as to what to do to make new "friends" so might as well have been or right now might actually be on the dole (not the regular but the special one for government officials between jobs in public service and/or new areas such as "consulting" and "think tanking" for their old chums). It was conceded that wherever they might be none actually were ever at risk for harm except perhaps for theoretical harm had they been which they were not and so on.
The effort to manufacture danger or damage fed to the press on its face is exposed most succintly as complete garbage by a single short statement from Downing Street (which the article had alleged shared the hysteria of the "security services" and the Home Office) completely negating all of the extreme and violent imagery of impending doom of which security types are are so fond with the simple statement in the concluding paragraph of the section of the "leaked" article below actually truthfully admitting in a simple statement that there was "no evidence of anyone being harmed" thus discrediting the entire idiotic endeavor of all others official and otherwise in the piece to create public hysteria (poor coordination perhaps not so momentous but nearly as unprofessional as for example when JFK's assassination was reported in some detail at Christchurch, New Zealand newsstands before it actually unfolded in Dallas, Texas according to several sources including Oliver Stones' film JFK just provided here as a rambling aside).
In addition to that limited section of the Sunday Times "exclusive" which the Ninth Amendment was able to peruse before it made the not difficult decision not to purchase a subscription nor find a way around the "paywall" of that newspaper to read the entire article readers further interested below can themselves find the second link below goes directly to the article should they wish to take that route for whatever reason as well as for other interested readers who also or instead may go the first link below to a BBC News UK article reporting on the "exclusive" article offering a somewhat more reasoned analysis including from a security analyst who does in his observations in the article seem not unduly alarmed by the "news".
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-33125068
http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/
The handy but nevertheless true genius of the narrative device of the further vilification of Snowden served well for Cameron officials to express their outrage at little personal risk and as well as provide an enjoyable laughable complement to the opening of this past Sunday's "exclusively" leaked front page article to cast Snowden as some kind of beastly monster who seemingly long has been on intimate terms (and actually in the Sunday Times appears in effectively superimposed photos coyly to be avoiding a kiss on the lips or peck on the cheek from "call me Vlad" Putin) with his globetrotting now dearest of exile hosts Russian President Vladimir Putin no doubt met long ago and known by Snowden and his dog on the streets of Fort Meade, Maryland as Putin of course is known worldwide to be permitted freely to roam the United States shirtless and bareback on his horse befriending Americans young and old alike except in communities where horses are prohibited on public byways or shirts are required in public.
Following the ghastly news in the "leak" was an ardently repetitive seemingly specific but at the same time factually void mostly identical pair of reasons fed to the selected press with great drama in which government officials to differing degrees intimated or outright lied that the Russian and Chinese were known (not true) to have decrytped documents they had obtained (well, were suspected of obtaining) but known definitively not to contain either names nor identifying information of British spies which documents only had been released to a very select few members of the most highly regarded conscientious members of the U.S. and British press by the "villain" Snowden who had "blood on his hands" and further was called by one official a "traitor" (although apparently not to Great Britain which is not known to have granted him citizenship) and so on which indeterminate event had within the past two years or whenever caused such a serious British security breach that some secret agents had actually been "moved" as in from one place to another.
This apparently was such a traumatic experience and unfamiliar experience to them that being in a new place without the same contacts and personal support groups and so on that they were intimated to have been at a complete loss as to what to do to make new "friends" so might as well have been or right now might actually be on the dole (not the regular but the special one for government officials between jobs in public service and/or new areas such as "consulting" and "think tanking" for their old chums). It was conceded that wherever they might be none actually were ever at risk for harm except perhaps for theoretical harm had they been which they were not and so on.
The effort to manufacture danger or damage fed to the press on its face is exposed most succintly as complete garbage by a single short statement from Downing Street (which the article had alleged shared the hysteria of the "security services" and the Home Office) completely negating all of the extreme and violent imagery of impending doom of which security types are are so fond with the simple statement in the concluding paragraph of the section of the "leaked" article below actually truthfully admitting in a simple statement that there was "no evidence of anyone being harmed" thus discrediting the entire idiotic endeavor of all others official and otherwise in the piece to create public hysteria (poor coordination perhaps not so momentous but nearly as unprofessional as for example when JFK's assassination was reported in some detail at Christchurch, New Zealand newsstands before it actually unfolded in Dallas, Texas according to several sources including Oliver Stones' film JFK just provided here as a rambling aside).
In addition to that limited section of the Sunday Times "exclusive" which the Ninth Amendment was able to peruse before it made the not difficult decision not to purchase a subscription nor find a way around the "paywall" of that newspaper to read the entire article readers further interested below can themselves find the second link below goes directly to the article should they wish to take that route for whatever reason as well as for other interested readers who also or instead may go the first link below to a BBC News UK article reporting on the "exclusive" article offering a somewhat more reasoned analysis including from a security analyst who does in his observations in the article seem not unduly alarmed by the "news".
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-33125068
http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/
