Ninth Amendment Suffers Interference And Reported Pageviews Plummet Since Reporting CIA And Bush Administratioon Officials Going Unpunished For Torture Crimes Against Humanity After Past Month "Visit" To Ninth Amendment By Apparent CIA "Front" Firm Alleged Service Provider Network Barrett Woodyard & Associates

       Saturday, 31 January 2015, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA -  The editorial board of the Ninth Amendment seeks the help of all well-intentioned readers who believe in the vital necessity of the right to free speech and the press as embodied in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as indispensable to a free and open society unintimidated by the State and as far more essential to that freedom than readers' immediate agreement or disagreement with the Ninth Amendment's apparent view or tone in the publishing of any particular post which it has the undeniable right and indeed in our belief duty to publish.      
       Namely the Ninth Amendment makes the unprecedented request in all seriousness that all individuals of good intention who read this post bear witness to the following not only to help protect these vital American liberties but to protect the continued vitality and well-being of the Ninth Amendment as symbolic of all free speech of individuals and of the press in any form including "blogs" to demonstrate and reinforce that no person or publication will not be cowed from exercising their free expression but in fact will be empowered by attempted acts against their well-being which will only serve to strengthen them and their readership and collectively serve to protect all from future Government encroachments or of those of other private parties who may seek unlawfully to silence them.
        Specifically after studying Google reported performance statistics and Google Analytics apparent underlying site-specific information as to entities impacting site readership in all its aspects the Ninth Amendment has concluded after considering all other apparent reasonable possibilities that the Ninth Amendment in the past month has suffered a steep decline in reported pageviews accompanied by bizarrely near impossible other Google reported performance statistics barring some gross outside manipulation.

       These historically unprecedented irregularities for this site which has been published on Google Blogger consistently without any fundamental such drastic change for about the past eight years moreover apparently coincide with two distinct events. One "originates" with the Ninth Amendment itself which for a period of a couple weeks more than the past month has reported significantly more posts on the recently released facts of the CIA Detention and Torture Program at Guantanamo Bay as well as various identified "Black Sites" in foreign countries as partially detailed in the Torture Report released 9 December 2014 by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) as well as the near-universally agreed culpability of and therefore necessary but so far neglected prosecution of senior Bush Administration as well as CIA officials for commission of acts of torture under existing United States law as well as for crimes against humanity under signatory International Treaties and Human Rights Conventions including requiring a statement of compliance by the Obama Administration before the United Nations Committee on Torture. 

       The second appears to be related to a one-time site visit on 30 December 2014 captured by Google Analytics of a reported service provider network of the reported name Barrett Woodyard & Associates reportedly of Malibu, California lasting a reported four minutes and sixteen seconds (4:16) and visiting a reported ten (10) pages of the Ninth Amendment. Since the approximate date of that visit the Google reported overall Ninth Amendment pageviews and particularly those relating to Bush Administration and CIA officials past and present torture and human rights abuses without explanation have plummeted relative to all historical site experience. What greatly reduced pageviews have been reported are of unlikely pageviews of posts years past often originating reportedly from countries rarely or never before having had readers of the Ninth Amendment but as stated above strangely reportedly nevertheless emanate from a very small number of reported browsers and operating systems suggesting obvious manipulation and coordination.

       First let us take a look at the more or less outstanding performance in the latter months of 2014 of the Ninth Amendment relative to its own prior performance approximately up to the time of its postings concerning and leading up to the weeks before the public disclosure of the SSCI Torture Report up to and after which time a significant number of Ninth Amendment posts have focused on the Bush Administration and CIA Officials' conspiracy to conduct its illegal detention and torture program and its attempted interference with investigation of and disclosure of the true facts of that program right up to the present. Exhibit "A" below.

                                                       Exhibit "A"                        

   

       Next let us observe the search information available on the reported service provider network Barrett Woodyard & Associates reportedly of Malibu, California "visiting" the Ninth Amendment for a single time as reported by Google Analytics on 30 November 2015 for a reported period of four minutes and sixteen seconds (4:16) visiting a reported 10 pages of the Ninth Amendment. When we run the search on one of our preferred search engines Privatlee for the following specific search "barrett woodyard & associates" which we encourage readers to do for themselves. As can be observed in Exhibit "A" above the Ninth Amendment pageviews have plummeted from more or less exactly that time.

       Now here is the result of the Privatlee search "barrett woodward & associates" "central intelligence agency" which readers were asked directly above to perform as is presented here as Exhibit "B":

Web Images

settings

add privatelee to search bar

PowerSearch commands

Results 1 - 13 of about 13

1. 7x24 Exchange Member Companies

   
   

   

   
   

   

   
   

   www.7x24exchange.org/membercompanies.phtml   more from www.7x24exchange.org -open in new window - try https

   Barnett Consulting Engineers, Inc. Barrett Woodyard & Associates Baskervill ... Cellwatch Central Intelligence Agency Centris CFR Engineering Consultants
2. mris.com |

   
   

   

   
   

   

   
   

   www.mris.com   more from www.mris.com -open in new window - try https

   Online real estate information service for real estate professionals in MD, DC, Northern VA, and parts of WV and PA. Profile, news and membership information.
3. 2014 Design Forecast - Gensler

   
   

   

   
   

   

   
   

   www.gensler.com/doc/gensler-design-forecast...   more from www.gensler.com -open in new window - try https

   Barrack, Rodos & Bacine. Barrett, Woodyard & Associates, Inc. Base Management .... Central Intelligence Agency. Central Shoe Repair, Inc. Centrum Partners.
4. Lead411 Company Directory: Emails, Addresses, Business

   
   

   

   
   

   

   
   

   https://www.lead411.com/companies   more from www.lead411.com -open in new window

   Lead411's Company profiles including all companies from A to Z. ... Company/Phone: CEO/Industry: Email / Co Size: City / IT Technologies: Schneider National Inc
5. Annual Report 2008-2009 - University Career Center

   
   

   

   
   

   

   
   

   career.uncc.edu/sites/career.uncc.edu/files...   more from career.uncc.edu -open in new window - try https

   US Central Intelligence Agency. 1. 4. Vanguard. 1. 20. Wachovia. 1. 12. Totals ...... Barrett Woodyard & Associates. Rabinowitz, Brad. BASF Corporation. Dillon ...
6. Directory - InsideView - Market Intelligence for Sales and ...

   
   

   

   
   

   

   
   

   www.insideview.com/directory   more from www.insideview.com -open in new window - try https

   • Get real-time intelligence • Increase your productivity • Never miss an opportunity
7. CONTRIBUTIONS FOR ROMNEY FOR PRESIDENT, INC.

   
   

   

   
   

   

   
   

   docquery.fec.gov/pres/2012/12G/C00431171/A_...   more from docquery.fec.gov -open in new window - try https

   BARRETT WOODYARD & ASSOCIATES, 500.00. BARRICK GOLDSTRIKE MINES ...... CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, 250.00. CENTRAL INVESTMENTS ...

                                                             Exhibit "B"

       The Ninth Amendment does not here attempt to delve further into the implications of some of the search results found at this time but does wish to preserve a record and encourages interested readers to do so. Readers however are asked please to well note and bear witness to the coincidence in every case of the two search terms in each result one of which reportedly is a "network service provider" which reportedly visited the Ninth Amendment just around the time of its reported dive in pageviews particularly of recent posts which as it turns out largely concern the second search term.

       Although the page copied from the Privatlee search and sought to be pasted here as Exhibit "B" did not paste in its entirety readers who have performed or do perform the Privatlee search themselves should unless it has been altered find a most curious search return which for unknown reasons is omitted here. In that search return the Central Intelligence Agency appears to be making a $250.00 donation to the Mitt Romney presidential election campaign as duly noted by the FEC. However for the time-being the Ninth Amendment wishes to stay on point focused on the commonality between the two entities whose co-appearance in search results is inescapable. 

       Meanwhile readers should further be aware and bear witness to the fact that after repeatedly requesting corrective action from Google nearly daily along with transmitted specific screenshots of site performance statistics the Ninth Amendment has received absolutely no communication nor any other apparent action from Google in response to its requests. 

       These screenshots repeatedly have shown Google in the limited number of pageviews Google has reported that many are from obscure countries never before seen by the Ninth Amendment in results which reportedly contrary to all prior experience are for old posts with almost none for the newer posts which unsurprisingly encompass the focus on the misdeeds and culpability of the Bush Administration and past and present CIA officials. Meanwhile additionally even though the pageviews reportedly originate from a hodgepodge of most unlikely countries other reported statistics show Google that these obscure countries at far different points on the globe are using the exact same operating systems and browsers.

       The performance statistics the Ninth Amendment has seen in the past month have gone from the virtually statistically impossible to the utterly absurd although the attempted ultimate result of these disruptions in reporting of statistics which unfortunately have extended some readers report to the interference or disruption of their access to Ninth Amendment posts are anything but an absurd joke as they appear to be a dead serious effort to stifle one more American voice which is that of the Ninth Amendment.

       In conclusion the editorial board of the Ninth Amendment makes the unprecedented request of readers that they bear witness to all that is set out in this post and do not forget it. That is the best hope for preserving the Ninth Amendment's and all Americans' freedom of speech and the press essential to a free society under the United States Constitution. Rather than stifling speech ideally it will strengthen it as we ask all readers sufficiently concerned who have not read posts in the past month or slightly more if at anytime please to peruse them now if possible.
       If there are those who would seek to interfere or discourage the writing and/or reading of those posts that is most likely where readers will find exactly what it is they keep out of the public eye and thus avoid public clamor that justice be done by the Obama Administration. Please do not let them succeed. Should readers of the Ninth Amendment suffer any interference the Ninth Amendment editorial board believes the best remedy is that all contact their internet service provider, Google and news media contacts directly. The editorial board as always expresses its gratitude to all readers and visitors to this site of good intention and in this case especially those who have persevered to the end of this post.

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved 

"Perpetuating Guantanamo's Travesty": New York Times Entire Editorial Board Again Opines On Failure Of The United States Government Yet To Close The Prison Site Of CIA Torture Of "Detainees" Never Charged Many Still Held Which At Least 38 Retired U.S. Generals And Flag Officers Say Is A "Betrayal Of American Values" And A "Recruiting Poster For Terrorists"

       Saturday, 24 January 2015, NEW YORK, NEW YORK - The New York Times entire editorial board in the below linked-to editorial from the 18 January 2015 New York Times Sunday Review opines that it is a "travesty" now the responsibility of the Obama Administration that the United States continues to operate at Guantanamo Bay the United States site of years of the documented imprisonment of a strangely uncertain number of so-called "War On Terror" foreign "detainees". Imagine the absurdity not to mention the consequences for a prison warden in the United States were she or he to report that they were unable to provide the exact number of prisoners they had incarcerated because he or she was unable accurately to count them.
       Moreover the conditions at Guantanamo Bay horrified as "inhumane" even U.S. Bureau of Prisons officials who said they had never seen humans anywhere so "sensory deprived"  when these officials toured the CIA torture "dungeons" of never charged, tried, convicted, nor sentenced "detainees". A great deal of information previously undisclosed just recently was made partially public by the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence ("SSCI") in its Bush Administration CIA "Torture Report" in the form of its 524-page redacted executive summary public release on 9 December 2014 with the remainder of the over six thousand (6.000) page $40 million Torture Report to date remaining "Classified" .
       The following brief excerpt from the New York Times editorial of last Sunday linked to in full directly below as quoted here documents prior attempts at action on Guantanamo Bay by Senator John McCain (himself revered throughout this Country for his service which included years himself spent as a prisoner of war in enemy captivity during the Vietnam War - or "Conflict" in official DOD documents - infuriating his North Vietnamese captors upon refusing even to be released when it was not yet his "turn") here speaking on the United States Senate floor:

In November 2013, Mr. McCain, backing a failed initiative that would have authorized transferring some Guantánamo detainees to the United States,read out loud on the Senate floor a letter from 38 retired generals and flag officers who supported shutting the facility.

“Guantánamo is a betrayal of American values,” the former military officers wrote. “The prison is a symbol of torture and justice delayed. More than a decade after it opened, Guantánamo remains a recruiting poster for terrorists, which makes us all less safe.” 

       In the letter Senator John McCain as can be seen read that 38 retired United States generals and flag officers called the continued operation of the Guantanamo Bay imprisonment and CIA "detainee" torture site "a betrayal of American values" and "a recruiting poster for terrorists, which makes us all less safe". This result is antithetical to what anyone except a terrorist would want. That is because to the extent there is a "War On Terror" Guantanamo's continued existence and operation contrary to American values stands as a living monument to the wrong side winning by appearing to all the world to have forced the United States to sacrifice its must fundamental values in order to save them. Not only that but as the former military officers state rather than making all Americans more secure the continuing operation of Guantanamo instead creates a more dangerous situation by spurring recruitment of terrorists "which makes us all less safe".
       It is a most scathing indictment of Guantanamo Bay that its historical and continued operation as a United States "detention facility" fully documented already as contrary to all accepted United States principles of jurisprudence and totally at odds with the human rights of all persons as well as the fundamental values informing the United States Constitution but moreover has been and still is wrongly "justified" as necessary to preserve and protect the United States and all American values. It however in fact while allegedly doing so in reality has all along been doing exactly the opposite. Guantanamo has come to represent before all the world community living proof of the abandonment of those very same American values that it would purport to preserve and protect.
       This broadcasts completely the wrong message to all lovers and defenders of ordered and defined liberty and those who love this Country for all that for which it stands surely none more so than the American people themselves that the enduring values of the Unites States which have seen this great Nation all the way from the American Revolution of the 18th Century up through the darkest times of the 20th Century no longer are sufficient but instead must be tossed aside without debate mush less Constitutional amendment in times of perceived crisis. Meanwhile the 21st Century seems in just its first fifteen years to the present to have consisted ceaselessly of one never constitutionally declared so-called "War" to the next.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/18/opinion/sunday/perpetuating-guantanamos-travesty.html?hpw&rref=opinion&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=well-region&region=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

Google Again In Apparent Breach Of Contract Requiring Google To Provide "Accurate Up To The Minute" Performance Statistics Which Google Has A Dismal Record Of Fulfilling To Detriment And Damage Of This Publisher

       Saturday, 3 January 2015, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA - The publisher of the Ninth Amendment through the Google provided Blogger service unfortunately must inform interested readers particularly those (1) specializing in technical areas extending to many aspects of internet integrity including that of all related aspects including of course of those providing communication services through the internet and the investigation of those who in various ways might be seeking to or even inadvertently interfering with the free and secure flow of information on the internet as well as those professionally analyzing performance of different services such as Google provided Blogger for purposes of rating its relative performance for whatever reason and (3) particularly those Blogger users also operating sites which may or may not be suffering from the same apparent problems with Google service as the Ninth Amendment.
       These problems of late whether emanating from Google or not but appearing nevertheless to be in the area of Google's responsibility to take all appropriate corrective action largely appear to relate to the provision of NOT "accurate up to the minute" performance statistics necessary for publisher's successful operation of the site and causing damages to publisher unspecified at this time but which may be ascertained by further scrutiny as necessary at the appropriate time. One primary example of this apparent failure of Google to fulfill its obligations to the detriment of publisher is the passage of long periods with, e.g. no pageviews showing or those showing from very unlikely locations such as for example Albania requesting access to posts from years ago which are also most unlikely choices given the availability of current posts, which long periods are then followed by a relatively enormous for this site appearance of pageviews at one particular moment.
       This practice almost certainly is not reflective of the reality of readers accessing the website and moreover appears to resemble to the well-known practice among certain parties of doing the the equivalent of what are know as "document dumps" so as to make it as difficult and time consuming as possible for the receiving party to sort out and make sense of the information provided by a reluctant providing party. Most recently for readers not familiar with this practice a good example would be that of Google's CIA partner in the release of its Torture Program documents for review by staffers of the Senate Intelligence Committee tasked with drafting a Senate Torture Report who were deluged after a period of an apparent trickle of disclosure of documents to the sudden "document dump" of an avalanche of over six million documents which apparently had been most likely intentionally if anything scrambled so as to be in no ascertainable coherent order much as more modern card scramblers in casino blackjack which constantly reshuffle cards to prevent apparently any type of counting or other malfeasance by players but by doing something which most likely is detrimental also to the odds of all players and most likely should be avoided with players instead seeking out more traditional blackjack tables where cards are dealt for example from a shoe.
       Now how is that for an extended analogy which might also be seen as a digression by some of the topic at hand which is the disappointment of the Ninth Amendment publisher reserving all rights with the apparent failure of fulfillment of Google aka Googlia aka CIGOO in providing this contractually required service without limitation to the damage and detriment of the Ninth Amendment. Readers who have made it this far through the post either probably should be or already are lawyers or the other interested parties mentioned above. The Ninth Amendment regrets having to waste resources on such a post when there are so many other pressing matters in our global community to investigate, report and provide commentary on at this time.
       Not having done so already the entire Ninth Amendment Editorial Board and all bureaus and personnel worldwide wish readers of good intent a joyous, healthy and prosperous New Year and moreover sincerely and humbly thank all such readers for their new or continued support of the Ninth Amendment. Over and out.

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

German Human Rights Group Filing War Crimes Charges Against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld And Other CIA Officials For Their Torturous Actions

       Tuesday, 30 December 2014, BERLIN - The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, a human rights group in Berlin chaired by Michael Ratner president emeritus of the U.S.-based Center for Constitutional Rights, reportedly is filing criminal complaints indicting former not-really-elected "President" George Bush (Bush 43), former not-really-elected Vice President "Pigheart" Dick "Criminal Notorious" Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and other CIA and possible other Bush Administration officials responsible for the systematic use of torture.
       Germans reportedly became "outraged" upon learning that in 2004 a German citizen was abducted while on vacation by C.I.A. agents and taken internationally to a secret C.I.A. prison torture facility identified only as "Cobalt" in the C.I.A. Torture Report apparently somewhere in Kabul, Afghanistan where he was tortured for four months after which time it was discovered that the C.I.A. had misidentified him in a "mistaken identity mix-up" at which time the C.I.A. continued to hold and torture him at the facility because it realized "it had the wrong man".
       The Ninth Amendment editorial board without comment provides for concerned/interested readers' further consideration the text of the addictinginfo.org article below with permanent link to original source and author information in blue headline text below.

Germany Files War Crimes Against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld And Other CIA Officials

AUTHOR: RYAN DENSON DECEMBER 21, 2014 1:35 PM

If President Obama won’t do it, someone else will. Thankfully, a human rights group in Berlin, The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, has begun the process of indicting members of the Bush Administration by filing criminal complaints against the architects of the Admin’s torture program.

Calls for an immediate investigation by the German human rights group was started after outrage ensued on the case of a German citizen, Khalid El-Masri, who had been captured by CIA agents in 2004  because of a mistaken identity mix-up and was tortured at a secret prison in Afghanistan.

Wolfgang Kaleck, the general secretary of the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, said:

“By investigating members of the Bush administration, Germany can help to ensure that those responsible for abduction, abuse and illegal detention do not go unpunished.”

In an interview with “Democracy Now,” Michael Ratner, president emeritus of the Center for Constitutional Rights and chairman of the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, said that he believes Cheney, among others, have no defense for torturous actions and should be indicted.

“I strongly disagree that Bush, Cheney, et al., would have a defense. This wasn’t like these memos just appeared independently from the Justice Department. These memos were facilitated by the very people — Cheney, etc. — who we believe should be indicted. This was part of a conspiracy so they could get away with torture. But that’s not the subject here now.”

“Secondly, whatever we think of those memos, they’re of uselessness in Europe. Europe doesn’t accept this, quote, ‘golden shield’ of a legal defense. Either it’s torture or it’s not. Either you did it or you didn’t.And that’s one of the reasons, among others, why we’re going to Europe and why we went to Europe to bring these cases through the European Center.”

Ratner then hit the nail on the head regarding America’s dangerous exceptionalism path down the road: “But, of course, you know, Cheney just showed us exactly why you have to — have to prosecute torture. Because if you don’t prosecute it, the next guy down the line is going to torture again. And that’s what Cheney said: ‘I would do it again.'”

Khalid El-Masri was on vacation in Skopje, in Macedonia, when he was pulled off of a bus by government agents, sodomized with a drug, and taken to the secret base that was identified only as Cobalt in the CIA torture report. After four months, and after the United States learned of the mistaken identity, they left him there and continued to torture him. They held him further because the U.S. realized they had been torturing the wrong man. Afterwards, they released him, dropping him off somewhere to resume his life.

El-Masri in his own words, in the same interview with “Democracy Now:”

[translated] I was the only one in this prison in Kabul who was actually treated slightly better than the other inmates. But it was known among the prisoners that other prisoners were constantly tortured with blasts of loud music, exposed to constant onslaughts of loud music. And they were—for up to five days, they were just sort of left hanging from the ceiling, completely naked in ice-cold conditions. The man from Tanzania, whom I mentioned before, had his arm broken in three places. He had injuries, trauma to the head, and his teeth had been damaged. They also locked him up in a suitcase for long periods of time, foul-smelling suitcase that made him vomit all the time. Other people experienced forms of torture whereby their heads were being pushed down and held under water.

He finished the interview with some pretty damning words that should make George Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice and Donald Rumsfeld shudder:

“And let me just say, Germany — whatever happened before, between the NSA spying on Germany and the fact that their citizen has now been revealed to have been kept in a torture place, when it was known that he was innocent, I’m pretty sure that Germany is going to take this very seriously.“

Help us get the word out!

 

Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved (no claim to addictinginfo.org content)