Wednesday, 14 March 2012, NEW YORK, NEW YORK - Again the Ninth Amendment says"
Thank you to our loyal Readers" for your continued support of our log (blog is not a word). The Ninth Amendment continues to seek out and expose those in our society who persist in exploiting the Working Class, abuse the less fortunate and ultimately most importantly have set out to
DESTROY OUR CONSTITUTION. The Ninth Amendment routinely reminds readers to avoid
SETTING FREE FIREFOX BROWSERS TO "PRIVATE BROWSING" SIMPLY TO READ UNLIMITED FREE CONTENT OF THEIGITAL NEW YORK TIMES.
The
fact of the day is that New York Times Columnist (and many other exceptional things as well, including a much faster and better writer than all of us here as he ceaselessly and modestly shares a seemingly endless stream of brilliant thoughts with his readers) Professor Paul Krugman widely is known to have won the Nobel Prize in Economics. Sadly as has proven inexorably to be the apparent undeniable truth as to that other Nobel "Peace" Prize winner aka Murderer Hypocrite Barack "Targeted Killing" Obama unlike Professor Krugman Obama now has conclusively by the admission of his own Administration of its heinous actions most recently "justified" as "targeted killings" of American citizens without any legal process or legal consultation on the part of the Administration.
The
hidden fact for the day which has remained less so it would seem with each passing moment is that the Ninth Amendment editorial staff is scrambling to identify any potential viable candidate for President who is neither flat-out unthinkable in that position or has proven themselves to be so. This member of the editorial board still holds forth a dream for someone of her own gender in that position, namely Hillary Clinton (who as many have observed comes with the bonus of housemate former President William Jefferson Clinton).
Can the Constitution withstand the relentless mindless attacks from all sides without some sort of saving grace? How can the voters who previously elected Obama in all his apparent enlightened sincerity stomach his legacy of misleading all, breaking sacred promises and worse yet not even know what horrors they may endure should they feel they must support him for another term as President if only to prevent any of the possible Republican candidates from picking up the Office where George "little shrub" Bush left off? Namely on the eve of the Country's destruction on every front Bush set upon.
Pardon the digression but then again perhaps Professor Krugman is another person just made for the job, though he would of course have to back off on a few of his other endeavors. Quite recently as mentioned in previous posts we lauded the fact that Dr.Krugman just now is having published a new book entitled
Stop The Depression Now! from his foundation of firm unshakeable economic knowledge borne of intense intellect and rigorous education rather than a Gingrich-style "motto" scribbled on a cocktail napkin before the flight landed or "I was raised just a poor-boy" Romney's delusions. Colleague Little L's comment on our hopes for Professor Krugman succeeding in taking a guiding role in saving us all from disaster was digitally published earlier this month as republished verbatim below.
Lynn, Texas
Copyright 2012 Little L and Big M All World Rights Expressly Reserved
That CIA sure has spent the years giving the term "war is peace" a run for its money. Meanwhile the "Center for Counter-Terrorism no doubt must have had a run for its money as to where to begin giving out its pallets of $100 bills (Dick "Pigheart" Cheney's favorite method of payment, especially when he was serving as, say Vice-President of the United States, a wonderful opportunity for personal growth). Well, whoever is out there keeping us safe sure is doing a bang-up job.
It did slightly concern the editorial staff and some of the more vulnerable Ninth Amendment global bureaus (that would be just about all of them now, thus the extra "hazard-duty" recognition for all but those actually in the company of a bona fide member of the Bush family or one of its bin Laden business colleagues.) that the Times we could not so help but notice rather hastily pulled the focus on the "much worse than first expected" loss of Libya intelligence line of reporting. Quickly it has been becoming rather more of a challenge to find. A quick call in New York on the redline "batphone" from Washington, D.C. no doubt nipped that one in the bud.
After all why scream in their faces our now nearly daily recital ("losses much worse than first expected" as in the, say, recent Taliban stroll into the most fortified southern Afghanistan base and ensuing destruction of more present-day dollar value of jet fighters sitting parked their neatly no doubt on the ground, where they sadly are not very effective and at least eighteen of them even less so after the Taliban has blown them up. In other words dear readers, what pray tell do you suppose are the chances that in Benghazi and most likely the rest of Libya as well we are as they say in the C.I.A. we are flying blind. Except of course for the legions of pilots warehoused in northern Virginia flying non-existent drones all over the globe. Excuse us if you would that would now be we understand "unmanned aerial vehicles". How creative. Just waiting for murderer Obama to give them the "go"
So now the C.I.A. special talent for assassinations gone awry is not quite so personal, taking quite a few more innocents along on their journey to death. Any votes for re-doing the gift shop and renovating the George Herbert Walker Bush Center for National Intelligence to enlarge the nearby "petting zoo" so clearly shown in the Google aerial photographs. So much the nicer way to spend the day. Of just back in the gated community with the babysitter watching some light television in what no doubt was and is still the far better "safe house", at least for now. Should readers find themselves right there were the action is we understand that the State Department offers some of the CHEAPEST AIRFARES, LOWCOST SEATS,BEST PLANE SERVICE AROUND,GET THOSE SEATS NOW IN TIME FOR THE HOLIDAYS.
The following comments to the New York Times when the "far greater loss" of Benghazi and Libyan intelligence than first feared was still giving the militants their pat on the back were published verbatim in the Times digital edition within the past couple days. Hit the time/date link on either comment and that should jump loyal readers right to the original Times article where the truth does exist.