Monday, 15 July 2013, PELICAN BAY, CALIFORNIA - The Ninth Amendment editorial board encourages both longtime and newer readers to use the Log's post search function (gadget) box in the sidebar to identify and read older posts previously appearing here which readers believe may have addressed a subject which has been or now become of more immediate interest. For example readers on seeing the date place of origin leading the body of the immediate post, such as Pelican Bay here, may use the search box here for immediate information on and links back to previous posts in which it appeared. Just as when reading other material in a trusted site with a dedicated search function they may use the dedicated search feature therein or alternatively as readers deem appropriate an outside search engine of their choosing to find some or more information on material of interest.
The Ninth Amendment's previous post documented steps by or on behalf of its editorial board and individual(s) properly authorized to publish its posts to determine and uncover the source(s) and apparently improper and unlawful methods confirmed to have been used by others apparently to stifle the Ninth Amendment log's publication and content.
The lengths gone to and the resources expended apparently in these efforts including but not limited to attempts at interference with our fundamental rights of speech which have been by us properly exercised through appropriate means available to us such as publication of the Ninth Amendment log total perhaps in the hundreds of hours. Ultimately should this be the case we are gratified as this would tend to suggest that if anything the Ninth Amendment has "struck some chords" or made others feel threatened that it has exposed some facts leading to or threatening to make public truths the exposure of which easily identifiable others apparently find most threatening.
Especially as such exposure or the threat of it has driven others apparently to break several distinct laws and expose themselves to the potentially severe consequences of doing so, we might expect that the Ninth Amendment is well on its way to achieving the objective of exposing and holding those who would and have misused power to which they have no legitimate claim. We find the attempts to stifle to serve as strong affirmation that the Ninth Amendment has been on to some things and to some persons which would appear to expose themselves to most serious risks to hide certain truths and facts.
The red flags to date investigated and under continuing investigation appear to confirm the commission of improper and unlawful acts conspired upon, attempted and/or executed including those detailed here and the post previous, in order to intimidate, harass and/or threaten individuals so as to interfere with the Ninth Amendment's publication in the exercise of its fundamental Constitutional rights including by means of violation of statutory laws in furtherance of this objective.
The Ninth Amendment finds this response to be the highest form of endorsement and evidence of the effectiveness of our scrutiny and informed speculation on the basis of what is widely known publicly already. Finally in checking the relatively recent advent of availability of gauges of our audience's trust in the integrity of our site, such as WOT and other social trust barometers, available collectively and in aggregated form by services such as WOT included in www.webrankstats.com, the level of trust our site where there is enough information available to gauge it, has proven to be at the highest levels on the scale. In other words it could be expected be at the opposite end of the scale from those who are the frequent subjects of our posts.
Finally back to the search box and our reference to finding further information on previous posts or in other places on items of interest, we came to think of this on reflecting on previously published material we have researched and we believe published on places such as Pelican Bay. This is the California "correction" system's most feared prison where inmates in the so-called "SHU" spend 23 and one half hours a day in underground isolated cells with one half an hour outside in a concrete walled-in exercise yard..
The "three strikes" law in California that can then land an individual deemed dangerous and unsuitable for mixing with the overall teeming perpetually ov California prison population has had unintended consequences which in the worst cases have allowed prosecutors to sometimes use even a single act to form the basis for successful "three strikes" sentencing, with the third "strike" component at times reportedly being manipulated to that degree from about the level of a small shoplifting offense.
As for threats made whether implicitly or expressly about young girls including intimating that they might be being watched and reminding (supposedly purporting to be in our own words) of the dangers and security threats posed them in today's world, we are astounded at anyone willing to expose themselves to the degree of risk associated with such threats.
Moreover when the young women referred to in the threats are in Texas as has been the case here, one begins to get a grasp if one has not so already of the risks to which certain person(s) apparently are willing to exposing themselves just to stifle the speech of this log. The Ninth Amendment most certainly has informed and or refreshed readers on the basic facts of the use of the ultimate penal sanction's use in Texas, a fact which has it escaped anyone can most certainly be confirmed and expanded upon by using the internal search function here or any of many external search engines. And the penal risk which that entails is certainly a most high one indeed.
Copyright 2013 BigM All World Rights Expressly Reserved
The Ninth Amendment's previous post documented steps by or on behalf of its editorial board and individual(s) properly authorized to publish its posts to determine and uncover the source(s) and apparently improper and unlawful methods confirmed to have been used by others apparently to stifle the Ninth Amendment log's publication and content.
The lengths gone to and the resources expended apparently in these efforts including but not limited to attempts at interference with our fundamental rights of speech which have been by us properly exercised through appropriate means available to us such as publication of the Ninth Amendment log total perhaps in the hundreds of hours. Ultimately should this be the case we are gratified as this would tend to suggest that if anything the Ninth Amendment has "struck some chords" or made others feel threatened that it has exposed some facts leading to or threatening to make public truths the exposure of which easily identifiable others apparently find most threatening.
Especially as such exposure or the threat of it has driven others apparently to break several distinct laws and expose themselves to the potentially severe consequences of doing so, we might expect that the Ninth Amendment is well on its way to achieving the objective of exposing and holding those who would and have misused power to which they have no legitimate claim. We find the attempts to stifle to serve as strong affirmation that the Ninth Amendment has been on to some things and to some persons which would appear to expose themselves to most serious risks to hide certain truths and facts.
The red flags to date investigated and under continuing investigation appear to confirm the commission of improper and unlawful acts conspired upon, attempted and/or executed including those detailed here and the post previous, in order to intimidate, harass and/or threaten individuals so as to interfere with the Ninth Amendment's publication in the exercise of its fundamental Constitutional rights including by means of violation of statutory laws in furtherance of this objective.
The Ninth Amendment finds this response to be the highest form of endorsement and evidence of the effectiveness of our scrutiny and informed speculation on the basis of what is widely known publicly already. Finally in checking the relatively recent advent of availability of gauges of our audience's trust in the integrity of our site, such as WOT and other social trust barometers, available collectively and in aggregated form by services such as WOT included in www.webrankstats.com, the level of trust our site where there is enough information available to gauge it, has proven to be at the highest levels on the scale. In other words it could be expected be at the opposite end of the scale from those who are the frequent subjects of our posts.
Finally back to the search box and our reference to finding further information on previous posts or in other places on items of interest, we came to think of this on reflecting on previously published material we have researched and we believe published on places such as Pelican Bay. This is the California "correction" system's most feared prison where inmates in the so-called "SHU" spend 23 and one half hours a day in underground isolated cells with one half an hour outside in a concrete walled-in exercise yard..
The "three strikes" law in California that can then land an individual deemed dangerous and unsuitable for mixing with the overall teeming perpetually ov California prison population has had unintended consequences which in the worst cases have allowed prosecutors to sometimes use even a single act to form the basis for successful "three strikes" sentencing, with the third "strike" component at times reportedly being manipulated to that degree from about the level of a small shoplifting offense.
As for threats made whether implicitly or expressly about young girls including intimating that they might be being watched and reminding (supposedly purporting to be in our own words) of the dangers and security threats posed them in today's world, we are astounded at anyone willing to expose themselves to the degree of risk associated with such threats.
Moreover when the young women referred to in the threats are in Texas as has been the case here, one begins to get a grasp if one has not so already of the risks to which certain person(s) apparently are willing to exposing themselves just to stifle the speech of this log. The Ninth Amendment most certainly has informed and or refreshed readers on the basic facts of the use of the ultimate penal sanction's use in Texas, a fact which has it escaped anyone can most certainly be confirmed and expanded upon by using the internal search function here or any of many external search engines. And the penal risk which that entails is certainly a most high one indeed.
Copyright 2013 BigM All World Rights Expressly Reserved
