Supreme Court Sickos OK Strip Searches For ANY Arrest, Say State Can Sniff All Your Body Holes No Touching Or Licking

       Tuesday, 3 April 2012, WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Ninth Amendment reminds faithful readers worldwide including certain members of the US Supreme Court please to avoid strip search searches by refraining from READING FREE UNLIMITED NEW YORK TIMES DIGITAL CONTENT SIMPLY BY SETTING READERS' FREE  FIREFOX BROWSERS TO "PRIVATE BROWSING". The Court in a hectic week surprised no one by now also issuing a decision contrary to a large majority of the Circuit courts that the State even with the safeguards of frisks, x-rays, and hoisting suspects upside down with a chain also may strip search persons arrested for anything including violating leash laws and lawn watering restrictions.
       The Ninth Amendment senses discouragement from over 200 million e-mails sent us by certain quarters that the Court, believed to be suffering from some new ultravirulent form of malignant dementia, brain fungus or rot, senility, and delusion but still able to groom themselves and speak (other than Justice Thomas), as it ravenously attacks any case before it that offers any opportunity to obliterate the last shreds of Americans' rights with nonsensical arguments and pithy factual examples based on no known reality. The Court thus has haphazardly obliterated the compact with the people that the US Constitution embodies.
       The well-known fact for the day is the marginally sometimes true conventional wisdom that "the glass can be called half-empty or half-full" especially if its packaging is produced by most major American corporations, or alternatively, "it all depends upon how you look at it" unless you have say just been run over by a monster Waste Management garbage truck which next then backs up over your head, neck and chest with the required "beeping" warning.
       Our point is that these sorts of little affronts to the Constitution such as the Court now finding it "reasonable" under the 4th Amendment for persons arrested for acts that would possibly have gotten you a "warning" back in grade school or even if just arrested by sloppy mistake as in the case at hand to justify a total-body strip search with government officials up close sniffing (but not touching) you and lingering around your body holes as they stare at your private parts in front of everyone yelling to "spread them" is no cause for anything such as say "armed revolution".
     Think positive and even if you really do not enjoy parading around naked with police real close staring at you all over inside and out, pretend to yourself that you do. Imagine that this is how you would be spending the evening anyway. Especially if you are Mr. Justice Thomas (who reportedly did have to be physically restrained in the Court's famous closed-door conference when he became over-excited and attempted to act out the Court's written opinion,) In any case voila problem solved, though you probably should not get carried away and let this get you TOO excited as there is always time for that in one's more private time should one be so inclined and not all the representatives of the State may be so similarly oriented possibly leading to some kind of unfortunate misunderstanding.
        As in they "suspected" you maybe are hiding an AK-47 or something in there and made a "furtive gesture". (Police like to tell creative stories like that in court if you are still alive to keep your future interesting.) No just take it easy and think of the rare opportunity to cavort naked with State officials as a gift. Well the Ninth Amendment editorial staff believes we may have been up for a few too many days now and hope anyway as we sign off this might have been a useful suggestion. God Bless America.
       The comment below was submitted by the Ninth Amendment and so far as we know was not one of the 1,500 or so that was published in response to yesterday's front page New York Times latest article on the Court run amok. It here is shared with readers verbatim.            

Ninth Amendment Comment To Times Not Published We Believe

            

• BigMartin
• waronnothing

The Court at one time at least ostensibly looked for "test" cases with some sympathetic facts say here of others "admitted" to jail [STET?]. Now in this case the man wrongly arrested and strip-searched for outstanding fines he actually already had paid (oops!) was his WIFE'S PASSENGER. The Ninth Amendment log at www.waronnothing.blogspot.com adds this as just another case showing a Court gone mad. Good facts, bad facts, imagined facts, whatever, the Court takes whatever is available ASAP should it suspect a SHRED of a Constitutional right intact such as that pesky 4th Amendment and its "unreasonable" restrictions in seven of the Circuits not allowing strip searches when ARRESTED for leash laws and so on. But really impressive is the Court's meticulous review of the strip policy in light of past experience. Justice Kennedy pointed out that one of the 9/11 hijackers was "pulled over for speeding just two days" before the horrific event. And? Had this latest historic decision been the practice at that time presumably he believes the whole 9/11 horror would be averted as with enough rigorous academic training one sees that the dastardly plan required first driving a couple days first with a carpet cutter stashed you-know-where. The next logical step is the savvy "correctional" official assembling a few simple pieces and averting the sordid history of the world for the next several decades. There again a tried and true technique of Supreme jurisprudence -- hit them with your best shot.

Copyright 2012 Big M and Little L All World Rights Expressly Reserved

Supreme Court Confirms Unsound Minds on Bench In Health Care Law Questionning, Assures Obama's Re-Election

       Wednesday, 28 March 2012, Washington, D.C. - The Ninth Amendment REMINDS OUR FAITHFUL READERS TO AVOID READING FREE UNLIMITED DIGITAL NEW YORK TIMES CONTENT SIMPLY BY SETTING READERS' FREE FIREFOX BROWSERS TO "PRIVATE BROWSING" especially now that the Times purports to have imminent plans to reduce "free" article reading from twenty (20) to a niggardly ten (10) a month.
       The editorial staff and global bureaus of the Ninth Amendment again apologize to our loyal readers as our game of cat-and-mouse with the National Security Agency continues. The NSA gets a new GPS system that tracks to the nearest centimeter, we get one that tracks to the nearest millimeter. The NSA gets new night vision combo infrared-10,000 candlelight gear that allows it from a satellite to read the date on a penny on the street in New York, we get new gear that allows us from the planet Pluto to read "LIBERTY" to the left of President Lincoln's head on a penny buried 30,000 feet in an ocean trench still covered with muck from Captain Hazelwood's Exxon Valdez mishap.(Still did not pay that $1 billion jury award after 25 trips to the Supreme Court, has Exxon?)
       The NSA gets frustrated and so has a very large contractor from the latest corporate iteration of Dick "Pig Heart" Cheney's "Blackdeath" outfit disguised as an African-American woman demanding $1.50 for a malt liquor toss one of our editors across the hood of a car speeding by on the main thoroughfare in "Hurricane" Carter's ("He could have been champion of the world. . . .") northern New Jersey hometown. And so it goes.
       Return from digression to note the news of the week as in the hallowed pure Italian marble halls of the Supreme Court the almost nine mentally unfit socio-psychopaths (word Copyright 2012 Big M and Little L) on the bench prepare to toss out Romneycare. Mr. Justice Scalia's incisive analogy of health insurance to broccoli making even the New York Times scratch its head. The black-robed gang glaring down from its bench in Fantasyland what do they care? They still get free care at Walter Reed, do they not? Though those in Washington, D.C. beginning to wonder if perhaps the standards have fallen somewhat there since they lost President Kennedy's brain. Or maybe that was the Smithsonian or Library of Congress, Thomas Pynchon might observe.
     No matter the brain-rotted denizens of the bench who have let Congress get away with any law under the "Commerce" or whatever clause (except of course outraged naturally finding a ban on handguns in schoolzones unconstitutional wildly beyond Congress' power). The Ninth Amendment predicts the Court's decision is a foregone conclusion, ninety-nine per cent of American's will hate this cast forever, and the Court will single-handedly insure President Obama's re-election. You read it here first. Take it to Vegas.

Copyright 2012 Big M and Little L All World Rights Reserved