No Encryption Terrorist $10 Million Reward State Department Website Plus Departments Of Justice, Homeland Security, Treasury And Other U.S. Government Inspectors General Whistleblower Unsecured Websites Put Tipsters At Risk Of U.S. Federal Government Retaliation Some Even Of Death

     Friday, 17 April 2015, WASHINGTON, D.C. - Whistleblowers providing what they are assured is information treated as "confidential" pursuant to federal law exposing Federal Government "waste, fraud and abuse" to Inspectors General (IGs) of most federal agencies including the Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, the Treasury and many others actually are subject to having their complaints and personal information including names, addresses and telephone numbers transmitted unencrypted via Internet exposing them to danger of career or other retaliation whether from the agencies themselves or even under the Obama Administration to Department of Justice (DOJ) overzealous prosecution not to mention tipsters facing obvious threats to life, limb, family or any number of other devastating consequences who might choose to send Internet communications to the unsecured State Department website offering up to a $10 million reward for terrorist information an ACLU review confirmed as accurate by federal government officials has disclosed leading to contact with the ACLU by DOJ IG Michael Horowitz regarding these most serious federal lapses.
     Among those that do encrypt their entire websites are the White House and CIA as well most major well-known technology firms especially in the wake of Edward J. Snowden's revelations disclosing the staggering extent of unconstitutional especially NSA domestic mass surveillance and metadata collection abuses perpetrated against the American people (assuming those major technology firms did not already know the full extent of and/or participate in those abuses themselves previously). Readers interested in significantly more information including the long list they should be aware of some of the federal agency IG's who do not have secure website Internet complaint and other transmissions can go to the link below.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2015/04/16/why-confidential-tips-to-the-government-may-not-be-confidential-after-all/?tid=hpModule_88854bf0-8691-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394&hpid=z14

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

BREAKING NEWS ALERT: U.S. Release Of Long-Delayed Heavily Redacted "Explosive" C.I.A. Bush Administration Torture Report Summary Expected To Increase Risk Of Worldwide Violence Against American Facilities With Six Thousand Marines On Three Continents Now On Heightened Global Alert

       Tuesday, 9 December 2011, WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. imminent release of a heavily redacted C.I.A. Bush Administration Torture Report is expected to increase immediately the risk of violence against American facilities worldwide with "thousands of Marines" and all the United States "military on high alert." This extraordinary announcement was made by Cable News Network (CNN) in recent hours. The Ninth Amendment urges all readers worldwide who have reason to believe they may be at increased risk to take this CNN report very seriously and commence all appropriate available security precautions while keeping themselves as real-time informed as possible.

       The Ninth Amendment emphasizes that it has not reviewed any Senate Intelligence Committee release of a  C.I.A. Bush Administration Torture Report ("Report") redacted or otherwise. However the imminent release of just 480 pages or less than a tenth of the redacted several thousand page Report is expected to be so inflammatory that the C.I.A. already has publicly renounced its use of torture such as that reportedly documented in the Report.
       The Report apparently documents C.I.A. Bush Administration so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" which are considered some of the harshest torture techniques known and were reportedly used on more than one hundred (100) prisoners. The harshest torture technique known is said to be waterboarding the use of which by the C.I.A. was made under the Bush Administration the Report documents with three (3) prisoners. Another not as fully documented technique used was said to be "sleep deprivation" which also apparently is one of the harshest torture techniques known and can actually be continued until a prisoner succumbs to a horrible death from lack of sleep. There have been further obscure references specifically to the use of these torture "techniques" in the hunt for Osama bin Laden but to no avail.
       Unfortunately logic dictates that in order for accepted credible organizations to have recognized the accuracy of statements about the ultimate results of sleep deprivation they must have observed such a death first hand or if not by highly scrutinized evidence of such a death. CNN for obscure reasons reports that the prospect of such disclosures as those above has raised fears that they may inflame already ghastly American hostage situations which speculation the Ninth Amendment does not care to further pursue nor does it understand why CNN would do so either. These C.I.A. Bush Administration so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" ultimately yielded no new information at all and "failed to produce any results."
       Initial information is that the State Department and C.I.A. are reported to have objected to this long-delayed federal Report disclosure with some making a "last-ditch effort" to further stall the Report's release calling it "a terrible idea" and former Vice President Dick Cheney dismissing "it" ("it" apparently vaguely encompassing the Report and its disclosure ) as "a bunch of hooey". Apparently however the state of affairs is such that the disclosure or leakage of the information as the case may be is said to be "inevitable" and that it is best to "get it over with as soon as possible." It would seem likely that some unknown to Ninth Amendment person or entity is threatening perhaps to release the entire contents of the Report if the Obama Administration does not at least disclose the redacted version of the Report imminently. This is mere speculation.
       The Ninth Amendment conveys here to readers the facts of this situation currently known as reported by CNN. The imminent disclosure of the redacted Report has spawned grave concerns spanning the globe including intense concern for the safety of American facilities and all those serving at them as evidenced by the heightened alert status of the United States Marines and military worldwide. Greatly increased concerns as to the physical safety and political dangers caused by the redacted Report's disclosure extend to United States partner nations in efforts to fight terrorism with CNN expressly mentioning Egypt, Kuwait, Japan and Europe overall especially on alert for a violent backlash.
       Meanwhile U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has made an unannounced visit to Baghdad which is not known to the Ninth Amendment at this time to be related to the redacted Report's disclosure. Given the urgency of the language if not the delivery of the above reports which most recently have included express warnings that global violence and deaths "could" or even "will" result from the redacted Report's release any potentially affected readers are urged to proceed with the utmost caution and to stay informed in real-time as much as possible. In conclusion the Ninth Amendment must and does make the disclaimer that this is a very preliminary alert but the information has been verified in The Washington Post and The New York Times with links in the sidebar and the specific New York Times article linked to below.
       Finally the Ninth Amendment does not take it as a good sign at all that Dick Cheney characterizes the worthless needless use of the harshest means of torture yielding no results as "absolutely, totally justified." The most recent reports indicate that to some extent the dire warnings may be the culmination of years of GOP fear-mongering sickly ironically here of "blowback" from the C.I.A. Republican Bush Administration use of the harshest known means of torture. But that is not to say that all credible warnings should not be taken entirely deadly seriously pending further developments.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/09/us/politics/white-house-and-gop-clash-over-torture-report.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

CIA Inspector General Finds CIA Hacked SSCI Oversight Staff Preparing Torture Report:
https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/Redacted-July-2014-CIA-Office-of-Inspector-General-Report.pdf

Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

VIII. Google Retaliates For Google+ Deceptive Practice Disclosure? DETERIORATING: Google Persists In Apparent Intentional Failure To Perform On Contractual Promise Of Accurate Up To The Minute Site Statistics Amid New Confirmation Google May Have Reason To Retaliate Against The Ninth Amendment Since Expanding Exposure Of Apparent Deceptive Google+ Practices First Disclosed In Monday, 13 October Post As Confirmed In Below Link

       Thursday, 16 October 2014, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA - Google after weeks of declining performance in providing promised site performance statistical information and then twice in the past week having apparently held back virtually all accurate information and then "dumped" pageview statistics for 100-200 pageviews in one minute has further deteriorated in site performance statistics reporting specifically since on 13 October 2014 this site published a true and accurate account of Google's Blogger dismal reporting performance with this publisher's site since which time this site has published 7 new posts inclusive nearly all of which Google has reported as having virtually no pageviews but instead merely a few from posts from years before from some of the more obscure countries reading this site but now shown as the leaders of rapidly declining readership numbers all of which has never before happened and is virtually impossible statistically such as to suggest Google either is responsible for interfering with site access and/or complicit in such activity and/or in any case apparently willfully neither ceasing any such behavior nor if it is not primarily responsible failing to respond to or correct the situation per nearly 20 requests by publisher via Google provided means of communication which have gone unanswered.
        Meanwhile Google appears to continue to retaliate against the Ninth Amendment by interfering with recent posts reader access and/or accurate statistical reporting for the Ninth Amendment's exposure of just one alleged component of Google's deceptive practices in trying to coerce Google Blogger and other service users to switch to Google+ solely for Google's financial benefit in attempting to create a contrived lucrative mainly social media franchise attempt by confusing current users to permit disclosure of personal information for the new endeavor and artificially create friendships and relationships between persons are non-existent one example of which is discussed for interested readers in the link immediately below:

http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/column/jay-gabler/google-plus-deceptive-friend-invite

Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved