Showing posts with label nsa rogers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nsa rogers. Show all posts

02 December 2016

Declassify Secret Russia Role In U.S. Election Intelligence President Obama Urged To Disclose By Seven Intelligence Committee Senators In Open Letter

     Friday, 2 December 2016, WASHINGTON, D.C. - Seven Democratic senators on the Senate Intelligence Committee in an "unprecedented"  three sentence open letter to President Barack Obama obtained, shown and read verbatim yesterday to viewers by MSNBC's Rachel Maddow urged the President to declassify further intelligence concerning Russian interference with the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election so that the information can be disclosed to the American people. The senators apparently were familiar with the classified information but disclosed nothing in their short open letter which concluded by stating they would follow-up with specifics to President Obama through "classified channels" and thanking him for giving his attention to this important matter. The Republican senators on the committee declined to sign the letter.
     To date there have been rare direct public statements by two U.S. intelligence agencies before the election those being the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security specifically placing blame for cyberattack hacking interference attempts directed at the U.S. election as being perpetrated by the Russian state including particularly by targeting both the Democratic National Committee and the campaign of Hillary Clinton then feeding stolen and possibly altered emails through Wikileaks for internet release specifically to damage Ms. Clinton's campaign to the benefit of now President-elect Trump's campaign.
     Following the election Admiral Michael Rogers director of the National Security Agency delivered an emphatic public statement again emphasizing that to a certainty Russia was the state party responsible for attempts and/or interference with the U.S. election. Admiral Rogers gave the strong impression that he meant to warn the public that it should take the Russian threat seriously which has not necessarily been the case to date doubtless not helped as Mr. Trump largely has conveyed a lack of confidence or concern or even interest in the intelligence he has been provided on matters of national security in his position as President-elect.
     Also as previously reported here in an earlier post a "top official" with the "administration" provided on condition of anonymity for undisclosed reasons a brief written statement devoid of any detail but "defending the integrity" of the election. The warnings of intelligence officials now augmented by the senators' letter to President Obama strongly suggest that the White House is downplaying some matter of significant concern including by withholding information necessary for the American people to grasp its gravity. Nor has further information been forthcoming as to the unusual somewhat cryptic uncharacteristic quiet threat with a slight smile by Vice-President Biden during an interview before the election that the United States was going to (presumably) retaliate for cyberattack interference with the presidential election or possibly anything else assessed as an attack against U.S. interests essentially "in an appropriate manner in a time and a place of our choosing."
     Former U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul briefly interviewed in the video link below when informed of the senators' open letter to the President said that such an action was to his knowledge "unprecedented". Although not being privy to the classified information at issue as he has been out of the government for a couple years and now is a professor at Stanford University he stated that just given the fact that these senators had felt it necessary to take such an unprecedented action as the open letter urging the President's disclosure of some classified intelligence was "deeply disturbing" and indicative of something quite consequential of which the American people have not been apprised. Senator Wyden of Oregon who apparently was the lead senator on the letter would provide no information whatsoever about the letter nor to what it referred. Readers interested in more information can go to the first link below which shows an MSNBC video about this matter of about ten minutes length.
     Readers can go to the second link below if interested in more broader background on Russian covert influence efforts that a "senior intelligence official" yesterday told Reuters have been increasing in Europe in recent years as part of a larger campaign against the United States and other Western nations seeking to disrupt and discredit democratic institutions, nations and alliances such as NATO as well as noting the coordinated efforts of these nations to monitor and respond to these threats, including as described by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper in a September 2016 letter to Congress just made available to Reuters on 2 December 2016 asking that Congress not attempt itself to probe Russian covert influence attempts as there already are ongoing coordinated efforts with other nations with these efforts underway best left to U.S. and partner intelligence agencies to avoid duplication of effort and not risk disruption of already developed coordination between these nations' intelligence agencies.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/senators-seek-to-declassify-info-on-russia-role-in-us-election-822587459996

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-intelligence-russia-idUSKBN13R2GB?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtopNews+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Top+News%29

Copyright 2016 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

29 December 2015

Leaked Voter Internet Database 191 Million Voter Names, Emails, Birth Dates, Addresses, Party Affiliations, And Phone Numbers For All 50 States And D.C.

     Tuesday, 29 December 2015, WASHINGTON, D.C. - A publicly accessible U.S. voter database consolidating 191 million U.S. voters' names, addresses, birth dates, party affiliations, phone numbers, and email addresses from all fifty states and Washington, DC was incorrectly configured so that it was not secure with the leak first reported by CSO Online and Databreaches, Inc. Those computer and privacy news sites according to Austin, Texas computer researcher tech support specialist Chris Vickery were helping him to locate the Internet voter database's owner.
     Vickery said in a Monday telephone interview that it was he who originally had discovered the leak while seeking to expose data security public leaks on the Internet. Mr. Vickery reportedly said the database took about one day to download and did not know if it had been accessed by any others. CSO Online said the information contained codes that may have originated from campaign software provider NationBuilder.
     NationBuilder Chief Executive Officer Jim Gilliam said the database was not created by the Los Angeles-based company although some of the database information may have come from "data it freely supplies to political campaigns." Gilliam curiously then while implying NationBuilder had not necessarily "seen" all the information leaked made the definite statement that the voter information "included" in the leak "is already publicly available from each state government" and so asserted that "no new or private information was released in this database". Apparently Mr. Gilliam may have overlooked both the security danger the voter information compilation posed including because of criminal use of it in "concentrated" form as Mr. Vickery pointed out as well as the fact that different state governments do not uniformly allow the same uses of voter registration information.
     Federal agencies quickly stepped up to shift the blame to others with a representative with the U.S. Federal Elections Commission saying the FEC has no jurisdiction over protecting voter records. Mr. Vickery said he has not been able to identify who controls the database, but that he is working with U.S. agencies whom he declined to identify to determine who owns the site so that it can be removed from public view. Unsurprisingly the F.B.I. declined to comment on its role presumably yet again sleuthing slippery commie states and/or tech punks (it might later hire due to its own present gross ineptitude) in this recent huge government Internet security breach doubtless hoping yet again no one rightfully could attribute responsibility to the F.B.I. for this or any of the other rapidly growing multitudes of government Internet and database breaches extending from the White House to the Pentagon that serve to magnify the F.B.I.'s inability to enforce internet security against anyone except its own corrupt recently criminally tried agents.
     This "no FBI comment" strategy is readily understandable especially considering that FBI Director "Backdoor Man" James B. Comey like screaming NSA Director "No Backdoor Man" Admiral Michael "Mike" Rogers has been increasingly vociferously demanding a "key" or "split keys" to U.S. technology company including phone encryption contrary to all reputable world computer security expert opinions (and directly violating Comey's pledge covered verbatim in a post here earlier this year in which he assured that would take "no position" on the issue) on the grounds that Director Comey and apparently Admiral Rogers even in the wake of the continuing tidal wave onslaught of U.S. government cyberbreaches still incredibly believe their agencies can insure any cybersecurity at all much less manage not to lose or have a "key" misused by a criminal hostile state within a matter of days. Should the federal government succeed in threatening American technology companies to get a single "key" or "split keys" the Ninth Amendment respectfully suggests that President Obama please immediately demand it be turned over to the White House so that it may be secured with the First Lady to wear as a necklace.
     Readers interested in more information regarding the above first reported by Reuters can go to the New York Times link incorporating the Reuters report below.
             
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2015/12/28/us/28reuters-usa-voters-breach.html?_r=0

Copyright Martin P. 2015 All World Rights Expressly Reserved