Thursday, 2 December 2010, WASHINGTON, DC - Amazon holiday sales and stock shares rumored to begin plummet as Web behemoth Amazon.profit.com graciously immediately bows to government pressure and forces Wikileaks site from leased Amazon.profit.com server space. Dirty politicians yesterday began lining up to congratulate Amazon.profit.com for giant Amazon.profit.com's bold move in going directly against the espoused false views Amazon.profit.com itself expresses in Amazon.profit.com's "phony support" of First Amendment rights.
Amazon.profit.com, the Web-based book, etc. seller which in a few short years has come from nothing under the leadership of a group of modern-day cyberchildren to dominate the United States retail bookselling trade, in the past day readily caved to right-wing United States' Government pressure to remove all WikiLeaks postings from Amazon.profit.com's excess server space properly leased by WikiLeaks.
Amazon.profit.com, which has freely hidden behind the First Amendment as preserved by the hard work of others, to protect sales of its own controversial "how-to books" and other materials on subjects as diverse as books on conducting germ-warfare starting in your kitchen and practicing pedophilia (on Amazon.profit.com's site to itself profit), has shown America and the world that it Amazon.profit.com is no New York Times. Given that like much of cyberspace and commercial cyberspace, Amazon.profit.com is ruled by rich tech brats with no sense of history, the bookselling cybermonster demonstrated that it has no interest in REALLY what happens to the First Amendment.
Unlike in the Pentagon Papers case, decided before the Amazon.profit.com cyberbabies were even born, and the courageous publication of which the New York Times and other major newspapers of record in the United States were willing to take to the Supreme Court, Amazon.profit.com immediately rolled over and made clear to the United States Government that Amazon.profit.com will not stake its "reputation" and/or very existence on doing anything like taking a case in defense of the First Amendment to the United States Supreme Court.
Instead in a day Amazon.profit.com WikiLeaks web-postings can be pushed out of leased servers entirely by the Amazon.profit.com monster. Of course the Wikileaks documents will just appear elsewhere and survive forever. However, the false Amazon.profit.com bogus "support" for the First Amendment invoked so many times by Amazon.profit.com when it means the greedy Amazon cyberchildren can make some more money, has now been exposed as really "mattering" to Amazon.profit.com at all only when it is invoked to make the greedy Amazon.com tech babies even richer.
The First Amendment shall survive, the information made public by WikiLeaks now will forever be free in the public domain, but nothing says Amazon.profit.com will be around even until the sun sets today.
The Ninth Amendment already has heard rapidly escalating unsubstantiated reports from reliable sources that the "Death Boycott" of Amazon.profit.com is on. Return those purchases, Ninth Amendment hears, and make no more ever again from Amazon.profit.com. The actually non-existent bookstore easily can be replaced by another within a matter of hours.
The investment move, according to global trading experts worldwide, is Amazon.profit.com options (of the "put" variety that is) as quickly as possible. The reportedly completely disingenuous "championship" of the First Amendment by Amazon.profit.com has been exposed by those who themselves should know best.
And the harder they come, the harder they fall. One and all. The Ninth Amendment hears that the Amazon.profit.com DEATH BOYCOTT officially now is on worldwide. The cyberbabies will learn that Amazon.profit.com is only here because of the United States Constitution, and, hard as it may be for Amazon.profit.com to believe, NOT the other way around.
Copyright 2010 Big M and Little L All World Rights Expressly Reserved
The Ninth Amendment to the Constitution is the strongest statement therein that powers not expressly granted the State are retained as rights of the People. The State has misconstrued, misrepresented, ignored, and denied the People's rights by elimination of protections reserved alone to them, not recognized by the Supreme Court, the Legislative, and worst the Executive Branch in the illegitimate exercise of draconian powers which unlawfully disparage the inalienable rights of the People.
