Friday, 16 November 2012, WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Ninth Amendment's "Drained Swamp Bureau" preliminarily reports it has received unconfirmed anonymous communications apparently claiming growing Beltway rumors that former C.I.A. chief General David H. Petraeus, to testify today before the Senate and House Intelligence Committees with the prompting of Acting C.I.A. Director Cantor regarding the Benghazi, Libya tragedy with additional questioning regarding his admitted Patricia Broadwell adulterous affair, may well be next up for a presidential nomination to the first available United States Supreme Court seat, including that of Chief Justice should it become available.
Readers are reminded to avoid reading FREE UNLIMITED NEW YORK TIMES DIGITAL ARTICLES SIMPLY BY SETTING FREE FIREFOX BROWSERS TO "PRIVATE BROWSING" NOR SHOULD THAT NO LONGER WORK TO REFRAIN FROM USING SEARCH ENGINE QUERIES ON MOST RECENT TECHNIQUES SUCH AS DELETING MOST OF THE URL (TOP WEB ADDRESS LINE) OF TIMES' ARTICLES SIMILARLY TO BYPASS THE TIMES' PAYWALL.
Following Petraeus' former Afghanistan fiasco spending among other things days with top staff members criticizing Commander-In-Chief Obama to a Rolling Stone reporter, resulting in President Obama's promotion of him for unclear reasons to C.I.A. Director, and the General's most recent follies discrediting the Central Intelligence Agency where his computer password allegedly was taken verbatim from the name of his favorite childhood pet which is generally not recommended. A position on the Nation's high court is about the only career advancement available to him in the spirit of Joseph Heller's seminal Catch-22 when Captain Yossarian and others received medals for a pinpoint bombing of the ocean which would appear to be akin to a seat for General Petraeus on the Nation's high court provided that U.N Ambassador does not open up in the meantime.
Given for example Mr. Justice Clarence Thomas' surprisingly unexpected enduring tenure on the bench where he reportedly has never once directed a question to petitioners before the Court in oral argument, and a majority of his fellow colleagues appointed by Republicans who have mostly unfailingly voted exactly as expected along party lines, General Petraeus should be expected to serve with most distinguished relative abilities on today's United States Supreme Court. To the best of the Ninth Amendment's admittedly limited information Mr. Justice Petraeus would never previously have written or expressed any judicial opinion although his discretion and judgment would appear to speak for themselves.
Finallly the Ninth Amendment expresses its deep sorrow to the American diplomats selflessly serving the American people when murdered in Benghazi as well as to all their families and loved ones. May they rest in peace and their supreme sacrifice for the United States never be forgotten.
Copyright 2012 Big M and Little L All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Readers are reminded to avoid reading FREE UNLIMITED NEW YORK TIMES DIGITAL ARTICLES SIMPLY BY SETTING FREE FIREFOX BROWSERS TO "PRIVATE BROWSING" NOR SHOULD THAT NO LONGER WORK TO REFRAIN FROM USING SEARCH ENGINE QUERIES ON MOST RECENT TECHNIQUES SUCH AS DELETING MOST OF THE URL (TOP WEB ADDRESS LINE) OF TIMES' ARTICLES SIMILARLY TO BYPASS THE TIMES' PAYWALL.
Following Petraeus' former Afghanistan fiasco spending among other things days with top staff members criticizing Commander-In-Chief Obama to a Rolling Stone reporter, resulting in President Obama's promotion of him for unclear reasons to C.I.A. Director, and the General's most recent follies discrediting the Central Intelligence Agency where his computer password allegedly was taken verbatim from the name of his favorite childhood pet which is generally not recommended. A position on the Nation's high court is about the only career advancement available to him in the spirit of Joseph Heller's seminal Catch-22 when Captain Yossarian and others received medals for a pinpoint bombing of the ocean which would appear to be akin to a seat for General Petraeus on the Nation's high court provided that U.N Ambassador does not open up in the meantime.
Given for example Mr. Justice Clarence Thomas' surprisingly unexpected enduring tenure on the bench where he reportedly has never once directed a question to petitioners before the Court in oral argument, and a majority of his fellow colleagues appointed by Republicans who have mostly unfailingly voted exactly as expected along party lines, General Petraeus should be expected to serve with most distinguished relative abilities on today's United States Supreme Court. To the best of the Ninth Amendment's admittedly limited information Mr. Justice Petraeus would never previously have written or expressed any judicial opinion although his discretion and judgment would appear to speak for themselves.
Finallly the Ninth Amendment expresses its deep sorrow to the American diplomats selflessly serving the American people when murdered in Benghazi as well as to all their families and loved ones. May they rest in peace and their supreme sacrifice for the United States never be forgotten.
Copyright 2012 Big M and Little L All World Rights Expressly Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment