Monday, 5 November 2013, HAVANA - The New York Times weekly "Bits and Blogs" section today examines how the United States Government continues to destroy the credibility of some of this Country's most successful modern era high-tech businesses including Yahoo, Google and others. The included Washington Post article below linked continues that newspaper's investigation of illegal NSA interception of Americans' individual personal private and corporate proprietary information apparently under the mistaken delusion that conspiring to commit criminal acts by hiring others to do it for one is itself legal.
General Alexander's NSA desperate to determine who readers' Google "Circle of Friends" are and why the NSA has so few is rumored to have followed the lead of other "National Security" agencies believed exclusively to hire first-year law students to issue legal opinions out of their Agana, Guam garage "HQ Legal Cubicle Suite" producing "opinions on demand" such as that any U.S. agency which includes "National Security" can flaunt laws in the United States and in Europe and elsewhere commit even more clearly illegal acts by enlisting assistance from its overseas "partners in crime" including the most recently disclosed GCHQ.
NSA which is not on speaking terms with its drone-armed archrival CIA presumably is unaware that it has been widely known for a decade that the CIA is both a major Google investor through a Wall Street "front company" as well as business partner through a publicly acknowledged well-publicized joint venture with Google.
Google and CIA servers in fact frequently are housed in neighboring buildings although Google usually has nice ones while the CIA's usually are hidden in faux "office parks". This can be confirmed by looking through their garbage on "trash day". The DEA has helped to establish laws that once placed out on the curb trash is "public property" as to which there is "no expectation of privacy". Neither the NSA nor the CIA are known to be conscientious recyclers even where required by law due to a legal concept known as pre-emption.
Meanwhile Google's President Eric Schmidt last week praised the "connectivity" of Cuba and North Korea presumably hinting that a major relocation of Google and other top American high-tech businesses may be under consideration to such countries with less intrusive governments which have better things to do than read people's mail constantly harassing the businesses to spend their time and money assembling massive illegal government information requests regarding topics such as who got what for their birthday.
Washington Post article link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/11/04/how-we-know-the-nsa-had-access-to-internal-google-and-yahoo-cloud-data/
Copyright 2013 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved. No claim as to Washington Post material.
General Alexander's NSA desperate to determine who readers' Google "Circle of Friends" are and why the NSA has so few is rumored to have followed the lead of other "National Security" agencies believed exclusively to hire first-year law students to issue legal opinions out of their Agana, Guam garage "HQ Legal Cubicle Suite" producing "opinions on demand" such as that any U.S. agency which includes "National Security" can flaunt laws in the United States and in Europe and elsewhere commit even more clearly illegal acts by enlisting assistance from its overseas "partners in crime" including the most recently disclosed GCHQ.
NSA which is not on speaking terms with its drone-armed archrival CIA presumably is unaware that it has been widely known for a decade that the CIA is both a major Google investor through a Wall Street "front company" as well as business partner through a publicly acknowledged well-publicized joint venture with Google.
Google and CIA servers in fact frequently are housed in neighboring buildings although Google usually has nice ones while the CIA's usually are hidden in faux "office parks". This can be confirmed by looking through their garbage on "trash day". The DEA has helped to establish laws that once placed out on the curb trash is "public property" as to which there is "no expectation of privacy". Neither the NSA nor the CIA are known to be conscientious recyclers even where required by law due to a legal concept known as pre-emption.
Meanwhile Google's President Eric Schmidt last week praised the "connectivity" of Cuba and North Korea presumably hinting that a major relocation of Google and other top American high-tech businesses may be under consideration to such countries with less intrusive governments which have better things to do than read people's mail constantly harassing the businesses to spend their time and money assembling massive illegal government information requests regarding topics such as who got what for their birthday.
Washington Post article link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/11/04/how-we-know-the-nsa-had-access-to-internal-google-and-yahoo-cloud-data/
Copyright 2013 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved. No claim as to Washington Post material.
No comments:
Post a Comment