Wednesday, 4 April 2012, NEW YORK, NEW YORK - The Ninth Amendment reminds readers that apart from avoiding READING UNLIMITED FREE CONTENT FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES SIMPLY BY SETTING READERS' FREE FIREFOX BROWSERS ON "PRIVATE BROWSING". KEEP THEMSELVES IN THE PUBLIC EYE should they ever find themselves in a situation serious enough that that mostly duos of the infamous "men in suits" start appearing in their lives at unexpected moments in unexpected places wishing to discuss blithely intimate private details of the reader's home and especially bedroom environment that no one but the reader should know.
Members of the Ninth Amendment editorial board breakfasting this morning met just such a man who identified himself as John and began telling a story of a now extended history of just such creepy "Men in Suits" visits. We were abruptly called away to cover a poodle fashion show and thus unable immediately further to assess the man or the circumstances possibly precipitating the reported visits of the "Men in Suits". But we have since been sent "Links" which currently are under analysis. No news developed enough to report but an excellent opportunity to remind readers of the following should they find themselves in any such circumstances.
Thus the fact of the day that "Men in Suits" live for "surprises", but not for themselves. Readers who seriously find themselves in any such situation would be best to consult with a trusted attorney which brings all sorts of privileges and jawboning in the public eye into play. In any case whomever is consulted must be knowledgeable, experienced and most importantly BY ALL MEANS KEEP THE READER IN THE PUBLIC EYE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. The Ninth Amendment offers this advice for readers' consideration not from experience or any claimed expertise but simply from common sense.
On a lighter note perhaps and then again maybe not the following Ninth Amendment comment was published today in the digital Times in response to a report of Representative Ryan's "people's" request of New York Times economics Nobel Prize winning columnist Paul Krugman exposing Ryan's idiotic proposed budget naturally embraced by all Republicans and described by Ryan as a "loophole eliminator" as really raising revenues by ultimately raising taxes including upon, God Forbid!, the rich. Although he his head of the House budget committee he somehow overlooked or rather misrepresented that small detail and now turns to the Times of all places to issue an obviously incorrect "correction" to help him out.
Members of the Ninth Amendment editorial board breakfasting this morning met just such a man who identified himself as John and began telling a story of a now extended history of just such creepy "Men in Suits" visits. We were abruptly called away to cover a poodle fashion show and thus unable immediately further to assess the man or the circumstances possibly precipitating the reported visits of the "Men in Suits". But we have since been sent "Links" which currently are under analysis. No news developed enough to report but an excellent opportunity to remind readers of the following should they find themselves in any such circumstances.
Thus the fact of the day that "Men in Suits" live for "surprises", but not for themselves. Readers who seriously find themselves in any such situation would be best to consult with a trusted attorney which brings all sorts of privileges and jawboning in the public eye into play. In any case whomever is consulted must be knowledgeable, experienced and most importantly BY ALL MEANS KEEP THE READER IN THE PUBLIC EYE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. The Ninth Amendment offers this advice for readers' consideration not from experience or any claimed expertise but simply from common sense.
On a lighter note perhaps and then again maybe not the following Ninth Amendment comment was published today in the digital Times in response to a report of Representative Ryan's "people's" request of New York Times economics Nobel Prize winning columnist Paul Krugman exposing Ryan's idiotic proposed budget naturally embraced by all Republicans and described by Ryan as a "loophole eliminator" as really raising revenues by ultimately raising taxes including upon, God Forbid!, the rich. Although he his head of the House budget committee he somehow overlooked or rather misrepresented that small detail and now turns to the Times of all places to issue an obviously incorrect "correction" to help him out.
Copyright 2012 Big M and Little L All World Rights Expressly Reserved