29 July 2014

Criminal Interference With Site Owner And Publisher Continues To Hamper Access To Ninth Amendment And That Of Readers To Site

       Tuesday, 29 July 2014, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS - Apparent criminal interference with the Ninth Amendment site and apparent computer damage to internet-connected computers per the above apparently continues unabated especially since most recent Ninth Amendment post(s) regarding corrupt Texas Republican candidates for office including incumbents and others presently serving in appointee positions. The Ninth Amendment Log renews assistance sought of Google and any geographically proximate FBI field office to Ninth Amendment's local bureau requesting full investigation and prosecution for all pertinent and applicable state of Texas and federal crimes by those committing interference and other cyber crimes and crimes related to interference with exercise of Constitutional and all civil rights including under federal and Texas state statutes. Pageviews of Ninth Amendment reported since publishing of the Ninth Amendment's last notice post about six hours ago have increased by over about 1,000 per cent despite documented continuing attempts at site pageview interference of both the Ninth Amendment and its attempted readers.
       "Breaking into and causing damage to any internet-connected computer shall not be punishable by more than twenty (20) years imprisonment." The cynically named "Patriot" Act (Paraphrased here to the best of our lay recollection.) It is not known if anyone has ever actually read The "Patriot" Act in its entirety since the "W" Administration (Bush 43) allegedly snuck a replacement to the official Congressional Joint Committee version with ink still wet on its several hundred pages on the podium just moments before the final full Congressional vote on the so-called "Patriot Act" legislation chock-full of sections which had nothing to do with terrorism but previously had been overwhelmingly resoundingly rejected by Congress as clearly unconstitutional gross law enforcement and Executive Branch unenforceable over-reaching.
       The so-called most objectionable "sunset" provisions allegedly inserted in the original text were later in many cases made permanent at the urging of the President Obama administration including Constitutional-champion Attorney General Eric Holder which also has continued and expanded patently illegal and unconstitutional NSA and other Executive Agency illegitimate and therefore Constitutionally ineffective provisions as set forth as the basis of the underlying compact of the United States Constitution which provides that all power resides and emanates from the people and where such powers were never granted to the State by the People in the ratified text of the Constitution and its legitimately enacted Amendments all such State claims to authority are null and void as they remain residing exclusively in the People. (See, e.g. Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin.)
       THE FOREGOING DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE NOR DOES IT IN ANY WAY CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE WHICH MAY NOT BE RELIED UPON IN ANY WAY AND MUST ONLY BE SOUGHT FROM A PROPERLY LICENSED LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PREFERABLY NEVER HAVING SERVED AS COUNSEL TO FORMER "VICE"-PRESIDENT PROFITEER DICK "PIGHEART" CHENEY WHO ALLEGEDLY WOULD SIGN ANY LEGAL OPINION PROVIDED THAT IT MIGHT BE LOCKED FOREVER IN A SAFE WHERE NO ONE MIGHT EVER READ IT UNLESS IT WERE IMMEDIATELY TAKEN BACK UNCOPIED BY FORCE FROM THEIR POSSESSION AND LOCKED UP AGAIN OUT OF SIGHT FOR ALL ETERNITY.

Copyright 2014 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

No comments:

Post a Comment