Sunday, 21 October 2012, BOCA ROTAN, FLORIDA - With all due respect persistent Ninth Amendment readers can we really be certain that Bush-family cohort Osama bin Laden REALLY was killed in cold blood without trial or jury or any real-time or any other real evidence by Navy Seals alleged murderous "picture-perfect" assault in Pakistan and then dumped at sea at unknown coordinates? This most improbable scenario worthy of the credibility of what REALLY took place on 9/11. Given we have been provided with NO real evidence other than an unlikely break that President Obama took from an alleged "Pizza Supper" to report in a matter of moments these altogether unlikely and most definitely apparently Unconstitutional actions to the American people before returning to the "Situation Room" to finish his pepperoni pizza with "special" invited (oh, really) guests who perhaps at least metaphorically held a gun to President Obama's head. Welcome to the Skull and Bones club.
Ninth Amendment readers are reminded to avoid READING FREE NEW YORK TIMES' CONTENT SIMPLY BY SETTING FREE FIREFOX BROWSERS TO "PRIVATE BROWSING" or in the event readers find that paywall avoidance unavailable to themselves take the initiative to quickly use readers' favorite search engines to find alternative methods such as allegedly deleting nearly all of the top URL line (top address line) while reading Times' articles.
The editorial staff and global bureaus are deeply grateful to welcome back "Heart on Her Sleeve" Little L as well as IT/cryptography genius Big Big Joe who we understand to have been undergoing recently intensive U.S. military debriefing as he fervently "agrees" for its edification the source of all real truth to be something apparently calling itself FOX-TV "News", with which we ourselves are not familiar as a brief viewing revealed it to be unworthy of any attention whatsoever other than its completely hysterically wasteful use of the American people's public airwaves in order to serve as an idiotic dangerously juvenile mouthpiece for the sole purposes of some foreign racketeering criminal by the name of Rupert Murdoch to further his own interests.
In contrast the Ninth Amendment has been deeply gratified to learn that the Ninth Amendment log currently carries a credibility rating of 90% with responding readers.
Finally the following Ninth Amendment public comment is reproduced verbatim albeit belatedly from the New York Times digital edition in response to an article in that publication a couple weeks back in the wake of the first perplexing Presidential debate. President Obama do NOT repeat that performance in tomorrow's final Presidential debate against Minkmitten "Richboy" Romney to be held for reasons which escape us in corrupt Florida (the "Coup d'Etat State") right-wing stronghold Boca Raton
172.
Ninth Amendment readers are reminded to avoid READING FREE NEW YORK TIMES' CONTENT SIMPLY BY SETTING FREE FIREFOX BROWSERS TO "PRIVATE BROWSING" or in the event readers find that paywall avoidance unavailable to themselves take the initiative to quickly use readers' favorite search engines to find alternative methods such as allegedly deleting nearly all of the top URL line (top address line) while reading Times' articles.
The editorial staff and global bureaus are deeply grateful to welcome back "Heart on Her Sleeve" Little L as well as IT/cryptography genius Big Big Joe who we understand to have been undergoing recently intensive U.S. military debriefing as he fervently "agrees" for its edification the source of all real truth to be something apparently calling itself FOX-TV "News", with which we ourselves are not familiar as a brief viewing revealed it to be unworthy of any attention whatsoever other than its completely hysterically wasteful use of the American people's public airwaves in order to serve as an idiotic dangerously juvenile mouthpiece for the sole purposes of some foreign racketeering criminal by the name of Rupert Murdoch to further his own interests.
In contrast the Ninth Amendment has been deeply gratified to learn that the Ninth Amendment log currently carries a credibility rating of 90% with responding readers.
Finally the following Ninth Amendment public comment is reproduced verbatim albeit belatedly from the New York Times digital edition in response to an article in that publication a couple weeks back in the wake of the first perplexing Presidential debate. President Obama do NOT repeat that performance in tomorrow's final Presidential debate against Minkmitten "Richboy" Romney to be held for reasons which escape us in corrupt Florida (the "Coup d'Etat State") right-wing stronghold Boca Raton
172.
The Ninth Amendment at www.waronnothing.blogspot.com
admits concern seeing your headline predicting to all (minus a few
billion) that "Obama plots comeback". What if President Obama really has
not been plotting anything, as the Times further revealed that just
after the debate he thought that he had kind of won. Now it appears the
President intermittently is kind of sniffing around looking for a game
of pick-up hoops instead of remembering he still probably has to win a
debate or two to stay President . His advisers coalesce into a major
Broadway chorus to make this REAL for him (like the Joaquin Phoenix
excellent Johnny Cash quip in "I Walked the Line" as the Folsom State
Prison warden pleads with Mr. Cash maybe to play something to soothe
rather than further rile the increasingly agitated crowd of violently
stomping inmates to help "forget" they are doing "hard time" in the
stone fortress many for life. "Why, Warden, you think they forgot?")
Likewise, If not for that saving zinger in the venerable Times itself we
too might have felt compelled to throw ourselves also into a Governor
Romney practice session in which the Governor seems afflicted with that
peculiar condition wherein he cares not a whit whether his lies to
eighty-five million people for a moment helped, confounded all or
demanded immediate retractions. Who needs to plot against someone like
Romney? The President's unfettered "disdain" further cited will suffice
just fine. It just should have been the headline.
No comments:
Post a Comment