30 June 2015

UPDATE2 Google Criminal CIA Partner Conspires In Illegal Preview Of Draft Blog Content, Unlawful Prior Restraint And Reader Access Denial Of Anti-War, "Explicit", "Intelligence" Content Of U.S. Government Agency Disclosures Of Crimes, Harassment Extends To U.S. Pathetic Removal Of Liar NSA Menace Symbol And Dr. Hunter S. Thompson Honor Tribute In 10th Year Since Death

     Tuesday, 30 June 2015. MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA - Google which is a joint venture partner of the CIA as well as being partly owned by the CIA through acknowledged and unacknowledged front companies of late again has been limiting readers access to the Ninth Amendment through acts of obstruction of readers' access perpetrated internally and/or externally by Google itself and/or in complicity and conspiracy with other parties. The efforts of Google to limit readers' access to site content is readily apparent and visible to readers who can see for themselves if they do reach this site that they now only are able to read posts from roughly three days totaling about five posts at the time of this writing pre-publication which do no nearly fill the body of the so-called "landing page" of the Ninth Amendment. As recently as just past months readers might recall finding a full ten to fifteen posts published on this first page. [UPDATE 2] It further has become provably apparent that Google illegally reviews and unlawfully allows certain as yet unidentified other parties to review draft blog post "preview" working drafts under consideration for internal purposes only which have not been published by the Ninth Amendment therefore effectively spying on it violating privacy and other rights of publisher without reservation and without waiving any right whatsoever to take any action deemed appropriate without limitation.
      [UPDATE]  In the longtime spirit of letting no abuse go unrecognized no matter how tedious nor juvenile the editorial board of the Ninth Amendment wishes to call to readers' attention the fact that the N.S.A. logo honoring the dedicated work of that fine despicable agency and its dedicated tech nerds who presumably could not become drone "pilots" either having left the N.S.A. to again become legitimate hackers or gone too rotten presumably due to incompetence or brain damage which long has graced the right margin of this landing page mysteriously in recent weeks has disappeared completely without a trace not as a result of any intentional action of this publication coincidentally at the same time that a list of live 24/7 newslinks at the bottom portion of this landing page with the recent addition of a website which rapidly reports and adds each new N.S.A. abuse also has disappeared totally without a trace including all other links along with it doubtless to throw off the trail of any suspicion as to the N.S.A. Never have we been so outraged as since after a years-long series of posts chronicling the criminal moronic mean-spirited actions of bought and paid for indicted Liar Idiot Texas Former Governor Rick "Payback" Perry re-candidate brain dead still standing for President of the United States within hours of his profoundly sad announcement that he would not burden the great Lone Star state with yet another attempt at its governorship the private email account mailboxes of the editors of this publication suddenly were found to be filled with all manner of amusing "confessions" by the editors of this publication to a rich variety of persons and institutions with whom we were apparently believed to have relationships capable of further souring of misdeeds never committed as well as just oblique enough threats referencing potential dangers to children of those known and loved by us.
     But certainly the most savage and vicious act in this most recent depraved hackattack was the removal from the Ninth Amendment of the dedication at the foot of this publication to Dr. Hunter S. Thompson who died 10 years ago in 2005. It is replaced here by the words of his widow Anita in a recent audio Colorado Public Radio interview in which she still lives in the couple's home at Owl Farm in Woody Creek, Colorado but has left all of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson's work areas untouched for ten years as a private museum for which she is scheduling visitors starting in August 2015. https://www.cpr.org/news/story/hunter-s-thompsons-widow-anita-talks-about-gonzo-legacy-and-museum
     We make it clear that the apparent gross curtailments of posts being presented on the "landing page" come with the publisher of the Ninth Amendment having taken no action on its own to so limit these posts but rather using the controls supplied by Google to attempt without success to remedy what is effectively censorship. Attempts to contact Google repeatedly by the publisher have gone unheeded with no response nor change again filling the "landing page" with what in the publisher's opinion are an appropriate number of posts as formerly appeared.
     Google is being subjected widely to massive enforcement actions throughout Europe including for several issues related to claimed market dominance by European regulators of up to 90% there although Google long here in the United States has had a free hand to do virtually as Google pleases largely due to the lassitude of the Department of Justice in enforcing this country's anti-trust laws being left to the whims of private attorneys to try to protect the rights of consumers as well as Google's long-term acknowledged partnership with the CIA including in the mapping of the earth known wherever possible to encompass the private curtilage and grounds of people's homes (just like their private images and information in Google search engine results) of course without anyone's permission to do so.
     Now Google is demonstrating the dangers that occur from letting one company have so much power. Here the Ninth Amendment notes that it is essentially powerless remaining at this web address to fight censorship in its longtime publication with Blogger. As is not uncommon with companies grown into "market monsters" now that Google is in control of a vast portion of the market it has gone from a company which grew large on the pretext of being open to all with minimal limitation Google recently announced that it would remove sites with "explicit" content which it always previously had allowed.
     As for the Ninth Amendment which often has posts investigating and reporting on abuses particularly in Executive Branch agencies such as the CIA unpunished for torture and the NSA unpunished for vast Constitutional violations as well as all levels and agencies purportedly engaged in "law enforcement" it finds itself with its public content which is most accessible to readers on the first "landing page" now to be sharply limited. If the Ninth Amendment publishes a new post it finds at the bottom of the landing page that it loses another current post not yet ready to be relegated to the realm of the "previous" posts.
     The Ninth Amendment entire editorial board decided to publish this post despite the content it expects to lose at the bottom of its "landing page" relegated to a "previous" page unless Google would relent from its illegal censorship practices constituting among things civil rights violations and if done in complicity with a U.S. government agency also without limitation constitutional violations most obviously of First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and of the press. Needless to say and plainly to see that has not occurred as Google given the opportunity has remedied nothing but continues in its illegal and repugnant practices.
     The decision of the editorial board to bring these matters to the public's attention became final upon preliminary research showing that Google in part through its "Adsense" program has for some time been using that program and other pressure to prevent Blogger publishers from publishing anti-war content as is made unambiguous in the link below. The link is to a Blogger publisher's post including an exchange with the publisher in which Google itself clearly acknowledges Google's censorship apparently also extending to Google's insistence on pre-approval of content.
     To those familiar with First Amendment law such advance power to review and reject another's speech and publication is a most dangerous type of censorship called "prior restraint" as it prevents a publisher from publishing material specified by the censor before any member of the public may assess it which of all censorship is found to be most repugnant to the courts as when the U.S. Supreme Court permitted the continued publication without pre-review of the "Pentagon Papers". If the Supreme Court allowed that with the continuing release by the press of the contents of supposedly "secret" papers concerning an ongoing military "conflict" one would think Google could let its publishers do as they wish per Google's contractual, statutory and other legal duties without limitation especially as it does so from the vantage of being a CIA government-affiliated agency implicating constitutional rights directly also likely in violation of a multitude of anti-trust laws that in the United States have long given Google unfettered unfair market advantage for which all others will pay either now or later.

http://antiwar.com/blog/2015/03/20/google-doubles-down-demands-review-of-all-antiwar-com-content/

Copyright 2015 Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved

No comments:

Post a Comment