Friday, 16 January 2015, WASHINGTON, D.C. - In a report ordered by President Obama in the wake of disclosures by former United States contractor Edward J. Snowden the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in consultation with unidentified "communications and cybersecurity experts" who for all the Ninth Amendment editorial board knows work for telephone companies who will be tasked with storing all this information in the future and doubtless need mucho expensive computer equipment to do so purchased by you know who and internet security companies who for all we know stand to profit immensely from the not-so-subtle implications of the report since we know U.S. "intelligence" agencies routinely do not have enough "intelligent" personnel not to rely extensively on contractors often apparently with no valid credentials whatsoever as well as "Senior Intelligence Officials" who in light of the recent Senate Torture Report we would not trust to tell the truth even if their lives depended on it unless it were by mistake in the reportedly detailed report find unsurprisingly that there is no substitute for mass collection of data on all Americans' telephone communications. Oddly no academics or other disinterested participants such as computer programming experts were asked to participate in preparing the report. Good work President Obama.
The Ninth Amendment is equally certain that there would be no substitute for kidnapping all Americans' children and holding them in CIA "black sites" under threat of death for the federal government to keep better track of what their parents were doing with their lives. The Ninth Amendment is equally confident that there would be no substitute for having a federal government secret "intelligence" agent or outsourced contractor with "mental" and "anger management control challenges" such as at Guantanamo Bay living in every American dwelling to have a better idea of how every household in America spent its days. Although the United Constitution might in the past have at least presumably called into question such practices a growing body of judicial opinions from totally partisan apparently largely deranged senile and/or Alzheimer's suffering federal jurists who do not seem to understand why the U.S. Constitution provided that they have lifetime tenure as well as the notable inaction of the Obama administration in prosecuting any members of the CIA or the past Bush Administration for any crimes extensively documented in the Senate's Torture Report apparently because an ancient Justice Department legal opinion based on "inaccurate information" in other words "lies" from the CIA it would seem the United States Constitution has become more of an artifact to display in the Capitol rotunda or wherever or a way for publishers to make money selling pocket Constitutions or certainly to be thrust in the face of other countries to "suggest" how they might wish to run their countries other than any type of living document having anything at all to do with the more evolved functioning or non-functioning as it were of the United States Government .
In any case for interested/concerned readers a more "sophisticated" analysis follows helping hopefully to sanitize and sound perhaps make more palatable the NAS final report and its implications in the link to the following New York Times article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/16/us/politics/report-finds-no-alternative-to-bulk-collection-of-phone-data.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=second-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
Copryright Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
The Ninth Amendment is equally certain that there would be no substitute for kidnapping all Americans' children and holding them in CIA "black sites" under threat of death for the federal government to keep better track of what their parents were doing with their lives. The Ninth Amendment is equally confident that there would be no substitute for having a federal government secret "intelligence" agent or outsourced contractor with "mental" and "anger management control challenges" such as at Guantanamo Bay living in every American dwelling to have a better idea of how every household in America spent its days. Although the United Constitution might in the past have at least presumably called into question such practices a growing body of judicial opinions from totally partisan apparently largely deranged senile and/or Alzheimer's suffering federal jurists who do not seem to understand why the U.S. Constitution provided that they have lifetime tenure as well as the notable inaction of the Obama administration in prosecuting any members of the CIA or the past Bush Administration for any crimes extensively documented in the Senate's Torture Report apparently because an ancient Justice Department legal opinion based on "inaccurate information" in other words "lies" from the CIA it would seem the United States Constitution has become more of an artifact to display in the Capitol rotunda or wherever or a way for publishers to make money selling pocket Constitutions or certainly to be thrust in the face of other countries to "suggest" how they might wish to run their countries other than any type of living document having anything at all to do with the more evolved functioning or non-functioning as it were of the United States Government .
In any case for interested/concerned readers a more "sophisticated" analysis follows helping hopefully to sanitize and sound perhaps make more palatable the NAS final report and its implications in the link to the following New York Times article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/16/us/politics/report-finds-no-alternative-to-bulk-collection-of-phone-data.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=second-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
Copryright Martin P. All World Rights Expressly Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment