Thursday, 19 May 2011, WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Ninth Amendment sincerely expects that readers are in no cases whatsoever even in "exigent circumstances" READING THE NEW YORK TIMES DIGITAL EDITION IN UNLIMITED AMOUNTS SIMPLY BY SETTING THEIR FIREFOX BROWSERS TO "PRIVATE BROWSING".
The Ninth Amendment wishes sincerely to thank the New York Times for directing readers to this site through the publication in its digital edition of numerous comments offered through members of the Ninth Amendment staff which refer to the address of this log ("blog" is not a word). In this post, the Ninth Amendment returns the favor by most highly recommending the Opinion piece entitled "Justice in Dreamland" by Linda Greenhouse dated Wednesday, 18 May 2011 in the New York Times.
We scarcely could have done a better job than Ms. Greenhouse in decimating the reasoning and legal basis of the United States Supreme Court's most recent (horribly dangerous) joke of a Fourth Amendment opinion issued earlier this week by the Court. The Justices who wrote and joined in this opinion must have come from another planet. They lack all understanding of human behavior as it is known on Earth.
Their fantasy descriptions of citizens' encounters with police demonstrate that they would have been much better suited to be science fiction writers than persons with any power over the lives of millions of American citizens. The Supreme Court has completely obliterated the Fourth Amendment in the past decades. Why are they even writing opinions about it any more, acting as if it even still existed to them?
It started with drugs, as Americans saw the Court chip exception after exception away at the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. The members of the Court who have joined in these opinions should be put out to pasture for completely ignoring one of the most important parts of the United States Constitution and a vital component of the Bill of Rights.
The Supreme Court obviously has become incapable of "legal analysis" that even passes the laugh test. Only this is no laughing matter. One day all these garbage opinions completely ignoring the obvious mandates of the Fourth Amendment will be used for ever-expanding purposes. It will not be such a light-hearted matter to these fascists as their full idiotic support of the phony "War on Drugs".
One day with a simple change made on a computer to scores of the Court's meritless opinions eviscerating the Fourth Amendment, the word "drugs" will be changed to "subversive papers" and "subversive" whatevers, and the United States so carefully crafted by the Founding Fathers in the miraculous words of the United States Constitution will cease to exist. The Justices will be some of the first to meet the masses as they descend on the marble palace the Justices inhabit and get a full taste of the Revolution first hand.
Copyright 2011 Big M and Little L All World Rights Expressly Reserved
The Ninth Amendment wishes sincerely to thank the New York Times for directing readers to this site through the publication in its digital edition of numerous comments offered through members of the Ninth Amendment staff which refer to the address of this log ("blog" is not a word). In this post, the Ninth Amendment returns the favor by most highly recommending the Opinion piece entitled "Justice in Dreamland" by Linda Greenhouse dated Wednesday, 18 May 2011 in the New York Times.
We scarcely could have done a better job than Ms. Greenhouse in decimating the reasoning and legal basis of the United States Supreme Court's most recent (horribly dangerous) joke of a Fourth Amendment opinion issued earlier this week by the Court. The Justices who wrote and joined in this opinion must have come from another planet. They lack all understanding of human behavior as it is known on Earth.
Their fantasy descriptions of citizens' encounters with police demonstrate that they would have been much better suited to be science fiction writers than persons with any power over the lives of millions of American citizens. The Supreme Court has completely obliterated the Fourth Amendment in the past decades. Why are they even writing opinions about it any more, acting as if it even still existed to them?
It started with drugs, as Americans saw the Court chip exception after exception away at the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. The members of the Court who have joined in these opinions should be put out to pasture for completely ignoring one of the most important parts of the United States Constitution and a vital component of the Bill of Rights.
The Supreme Court obviously has become incapable of "legal analysis" that even passes the laugh test. Only this is no laughing matter. One day all these garbage opinions completely ignoring the obvious mandates of the Fourth Amendment will be used for ever-expanding purposes. It will not be such a light-hearted matter to these fascists as their full idiotic support of the phony "War on Drugs".
One day with a simple change made on a computer to scores of the Court's meritless opinions eviscerating the Fourth Amendment, the word "drugs" will be changed to "subversive papers" and "subversive" whatevers, and the United States so carefully crafted by the Founding Fathers in the miraculous words of the United States Constitution will cease to exist. The Justices will be some of the first to meet the masses as they descend on the marble palace the Justices inhabit and get a full taste of the Revolution first hand.
Copyright 2011 Big M and Little L All World Rights Expressly Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment