Saturday, 20 August 2011, EGYPT-ISRAEL BORDER - The Ninth Amendment dutifully reminds our READERS THAT THEY PROBABLY SHOULD NOT BYPASS THE NEW YORK TIMES MEGA-MILLION DOLLAR "PAYWALL" AND READ UNLIMITED DIGITAL TIMES CONTENT SIMPLY BY SETTING THEIR FIREFOX BROWSERS TO "PRIVATE BROWSING". There we said it again, as we always have for a while except perhaps if we forget.
Meanwhile in more questionably significant "news" the Ninth Amendment editors, interns and global staff back at Ninth Amendment's bunker headquarters (which may or may not be in Phoenix under the secret fortified Bank of America or maybe American Express Building or in San Antonio under the secret fortified federal law enforcement building, or just in the back of a Papa John's Pizza) had been enjoying the 1,000 plus Sarah Palin picture slideshow on zimbio or zambio or something like that .com (over pizza just as President Obama did as he watched our forces murder Osama bin Laden from the White House "Situation Room") when it came to our attention that the Israelis are arguing with their neighbors again after murdering some more. Did readers realize that Sarah Palin is not a blonde?
Anyway, as readers may have surmised we have allowed our interns to edit today's post. They have expressed confusion as to why the British orchestrated the Palestinian vote post-WWII for possession of a country that already was home to the Palestinian people, but then the Jewish people apparently in response to the Holocaust flooded the country so they could swing the vote to take over the Palestinian's country and name it Israel because something in the Torah or some holy book said that it was their land thousands of years ago and the Holocaust especially pretty much gave them the moral right to do whatever they wanted.
Our interns asked us if the Palestinians were responsible for the Holocaust and maybe that was why their country was taken away, but as far as we know that was principally blood on the hands of the Germans in WWII. In any case, our interns are wondering if they lose their homes to foreclosure or something, would it be okay if they flocked to Manhattan, had a vote, renamed it, took it over, and kicked out all the New York City residents? Especially if they found authority for this in some old book? Would the people from New York City then be condemned to a lifetime plus an eternity wandering aimlessly around the Hackensack meadowlands and living under the New Jersey Turnpike. Just wondering. This post proudly edited by our interns, all of whom allegedly graduated or at least claim to have at sometime attended Texas A & M along with Texas Governor Rick "six-shooter" Perry.
Watch your news carefully, Perry is on the loose, and apparently his handlers have not fully reigned him in and gagged him yet. Perry-Palin in 2012. United States apocalypse in 2013.
Copyright 2011 Big M and Little L All World Rights Expressly Reserved
Meanwhile in more questionably significant "news" the Ninth Amendment editors, interns and global staff back at Ninth Amendment's bunker headquarters (which may or may not be in Phoenix under the secret fortified Bank of America or maybe American Express Building or in San Antonio under the secret fortified federal law enforcement building, or just in the back of a Papa John's Pizza) had been enjoying the 1,000 plus Sarah Palin picture slideshow on zimbio or zambio or something like that .com (over pizza just as President Obama did as he watched our forces murder Osama bin Laden from the White House "Situation Room") when it came to our attention that the Israelis are arguing with their neighbors again after murdering some more. Did readers realize that Sarah Palin is not a blonde?
Anyway, as readers may have surmised we have allowed our interns to edit today's post. They have expressed confusion as to why the British orchestrated the Palestinian vote post-WWII for possession of a country that already was home to the Palestinian people, but then the Jewish people apparently in response to the Holocaust flooded the country so they could swing the vote to take over the Palestinian's country and name it Israel because something in the Torah or some holy book said that it was their land thousands of years ago and the Holocaust especially pretty much gave them the moral right to do whatever they wanted.
Our interns asked us if the Palestinians were responsible for the Holocaust and maybe that was why their country was taken away, but as far as we know that was principally blood on the hands of the Germans in WWII. In any case, our interns are wondering if they lose their homes to foreclosure or something, would it be okay if they flocked to Manhattan, had a vote, renamed it, took it over, and kicked out all the New York City residents? Especially if they found authority for this in some old book? Would the people from New York City then be condemned to a lifetime plus an eternity wandering aimlessly around the Hackensack meadowlands and living under the New Jersey Turnpike. Just wondering. This post proudly edited by our interns, all of whom allegedly graduated or at least claim to have at sometime attended Texas A & M along with Texas Governor Rick "six-shooter" Perry.
Watch your news carefully, Perry is on the loose, and apparently his handlers have not fully reigned him in and gagged him yet. Perry-Palin in 2012. United States apocalypse in 2013.
Copyright 2011 Big M and Little L All World Rights Expressly Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment