Saturday, 17 September 2011, 51st STATE OF CONSCIOUSNESS - The Ninth Amendment reminds that READERS SHOULD NOT READ UNLIMITED FREE NEW YORK TIMES DIGITAL CONTENT SIMPLY BY SETTING FREE FIREFOX BROWSERS TO "PRIVATE BROWSING". The following additional post for today is another expected not to be published comment in response to the "fourth-rate" guest (we hope) Times academic opinion piece that is utterly disrespectful in his claimed "unconstitutionality" of Constitution Day.
COMMENT:
Cute piece. We have reviewed your published opinion in the New York Times today and find it despicable for its lack of respect for the unique brilliance of the Founding Fathers, the sacred nature of the document of the Constitution as the best governing document ever created by peoplekind, and your ineptitude and unfitness for Constitutional interpretation. Every State's ratification of the United States Constitution was an implicit affirmation of its support for the celebration of Constitution Day. Your academic credentials indicate your lack of ability to even presume to interpret the Constitution.
Why not focus on the unconstitutionality of the phony "War on Drugs", the "non-existent" drone campaign of the CIA, every "conflict" since WWII, and/or the completely unsupported use of the "Commerce Clause". We look forward to never hearing your interpretation of the doctrine of "Incorporation by Reference" to which we are more closely aligned than you might imagine.
In your case, we the editorial staff and global bureaus of the Ninth Amendment log hope given your so-called "credentials" you can recite the IXth Amendment by heart (it is not that long). You at first called to mind that Thomas Jefferson said "a little blood must be shed". However given our beliefs we decided we would rather fight to the death for your right to say what you wish, even on "Constitution Day". Hope never to see you again in the Times. Meanwhile "Merry Christmas", and "Happy Easter", too.
Copyright 2011 Big M All World Rights Expressly Reserved
COMMENT:
Cute piece. We have reviewed your published opinion in the New York Times today and find it despicable for its lack of respect for the unique brilliance of the Founding Fathers, the sacred nature of the document of the Constitution as the best governing document ever created by peoplekind, and your ineptitude and unfitness for Constitutional interpretation. Every State's ratification of the United States Constitution was an implicit affirmation of its support for the celebration of Constitution Day. Your academic credentials indicate your lack of ability to even presume to interpret the Constitution.
Why not focus on the unconstitutionality of the phony "War on Drugs", the "non-existent" drone campaign of the CIA, every "conflict" since WWII, and/or the completely unsupported use of the "Commerce Clause". We look forward to never hearing your interpretation of the doctrine of "Incorporation by Reference" to which we are more closely aligned than you might imagine.
In your case, we the editorial staff and global bureaus of the Ninth Amendment log hope given your so-called "credentials" you can recite the IXth Amendment by heart (it is not that long). You at first called to mind that Thomas Jefferson said "a little blood must be shed". However given our beliefs we decided we would rather fight to the death for your right to say what you wish, even on "Constitution Day". Hope never to see you again in the Times. Meanwhile "Merry Christmas", and "Happy Easter", too.
Copyright 2011 Big M All World Rights Expressly Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment